• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

University of Hawaii Professor: Universities Should Stop Hiring ‘White Cis Men’

So anti-white hatred is okay, because standing up for whites is hatred? Your position is illogical.

Strange as a white person I never felt the need for anyone to stand up for myself due to my skin color or any other reason for that matter.

So why should I or anyone else now have the need for you to stand up for those of us with white skins?
 
I thought that you were against hate? I guess that only applies to hate directed at anyone besides whites.

There's no hate from the prof. That you cannot discern such is telling.
 
Strange as a white person I never felt the need for anyone to stand up for myself due to my skin color or any other reason for that matter.

So why should I or anyone else now have the need for you to stand up for those of us with white skins?

What exactly is your ethnic background, might I ask?
 
There's no hate from the prof. That you cannot discern such is telling.

She just wants you fired and not able to get a job. But sure, she doesn't hate.
 
She just wants you fired and not able to get a job. But sure, she doesn't hate.

It's not about hate or inferiority. Must you label everyone you disagree with a racist?
 
It's not about hate or inferiority. Must you label everyone you disagree with a racist?

I didn't call her a racist. I just said that she's full of hate.
 
I didn't call her a racist. I just said that she's full of hate.

You claimed she was full of racial hate, but you didn't call her a racist? haha

Way to cowardly weasel.
 
This woman is a liberal math teacher

No wonder American students are so far behind the rest of the world in math and science with wacko's like this teaching them

For those too lazy to read she wants white males who are not homosexuals to quit or be fired from their jobs


https://hawaiinformer.com/38468/haw...eges-stop-hiring-white-cis-men-campus-reform/

University of Hawaii Professor: Universities Should Stop Hiring 'White Cis Men' - Breitbart

Welp, she's pretty stupid.
 
I'm asking you. You said that the professor is an example of why liberal education fails. Talk to me about liberal education. Explain to me the major differences between liberal and non-liberal education. Give us examples. Which non-liberal colleges and universities are the examples of the type education you would have Americans follow?

When does she find time to teach when her mind is fixed on transgender revenge against straight (CIS) white males.

Liberal education is more interested in social engineering than education
 
Welp, she's pretty stupid.

I would assume not. She is a math teacher at a college. I doubt a truly stupid person could obtain and maintain such employment.

I contend her spirit is filled with anti-white racism and racial hatred... which can happen to an otherwise intelligent person.

Since she wants ALL white men treated in a discrimintory way and punitive fashion, she is also a person who lacks the ability to understand that while SOME white males actually have "Privilege" and / or bigotry against non-whites, it is not a universal attribute of ALL white males. In other words, she is a person so blinded by her racial hatred, that she cannot see people as individuals, but only a members of Racial Identity Politics Groups.

Well, those people who cannot see people as Individuals, but only as members of Racial Identity Politics Groups, we have a term for such people... Democrats.

-
 
So as the Unbomber was/is a high level mathematician his opinions should reflected on mathematicians as a group or anyone else for that matter in the world?

A mathematician that is a nut is still a nut first and his or her opinions only reflected on themselves.

But please feel free to show any proof that this woman opinions are common and not a complete outrider with mathematicians at all levels.

The unibomber was a loner.

Liberal educators are herd animals

When you see one you've prettyh much seen them all
 
So you want white people to have an advantage? How's that working out for you personally?



College professors have lost authority in the classroom? Compared to when? How much of a problem is classroom behavior for students/parents paying big bucks?



Are you relating tenure to liberal or non-liberal colleges and universities? You see no benefit in tenure beyond faculty? Unfortunately, tenured faculty ain't what it once was as more and more colleges and universities are employing adjuncts as a measure to cut costs.

If thats how the cookie crumbles, yes.

Whites do nothing to hold black people down.

Whites who are successful - and not all of them are - do nothing in their lives than black people cant do also.
 
This woman is a liberal math teacher

No wonder American students are so far behind the rest of the world in math and science with wacko's like this teaching them

For those too lazy to read she wants white males who are not homosexuals to quit or be fired from their jobs


https://hawaiinformer.com/38468/haw...eges-stop-hiring-white-cis-men-campus-reform/

University of Hawaii Professor: Universities Should Stop Hiring 'White Cis Men' - Breitbart

Let her want whatever she pleases. It's not going to happen.
 
You claimed she was full of racial hate, but you didn't call her a racist? haha

Way to cowardly weasel.

I told you that I don't have a good definition for racism, so I really try to avoid the word. She is full of hate, though, yes.
 
We've had a similar discussion. You are committed to hatred, racism and bigotry. End of discussion. Read my signature.

When I read your remarks and those of the poster you choose not to debate, it seems to me that you are the one who is defending official race discrimination against whites, while trying to hide that fact by accusing him of racism.
 
When I read your remarks and those of the poster you choose not to debate, it seems to me that you are the one who is defending official race discrimination against whites, while trying to hide that fact by accusing him of racism.

That is no surprise. Of course it would appear that way to you.
 
When I read your remarks and those of the poster you choose not to debate, it seems to me that you are the one who is defending official race discrimination against whites, while trying to hide that fact by accusing him of racism.

Which is exactly how all of these diversity advocates operate.
 
I told you that I don't have a good definition for racism, so I really try to avoid the word. She is full of hate, though, yes.

Nothing she said was hateful, that's merely your projection.
 
Nothing she said was hateful, that's merely your projection.

So she wants white men to not have jobs, and I'm racist for saying that's hateful?
 
So she wants white men to not have jobs, and I'm racist for saying that's hateful?

People might call you racist for many reasons, I'm not here to explain that to you.

Nothing she said was hateful. Stop projecting hate.
 
Remember back when 'progress' meant growth, opportunity, equality, and an end to judgement based on race and gender?

Good times.
 
I didn't call her a racist. I just said that she's full of hate.
I dont mind calling her a racist...primarily because she is...well...a racist. And a sexist. And a gendrist. And lets not forget douchebag...she's also a douchebag.

Not sure how anyone can see a dumbass railing on about race and gender and not be willing to call her what she is.
 
Back
Top Bottom