• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anyone remember how the Ken Starr investigation Actually started?

Hint: It Wasn't about Miss Lewinsky......................:)

Who ever thought it was? A culture that allowed Ted Kennedy to be Senator is not primarily interested in what happens to the Missuses.
 
That was all the Whitewater brouhaha that came to nothing
 
Hint: It Wasn't about Miss Lewinsky......................:)

I think it's utterly ironic that a Trump hater is referencing Kenneth Starr and his witch-hunt. Let me guess: you've already got buyer's remorse.
 
Who ever thought it was? A culture that allowed Ted Kennedy to be Senator is not primarily interested in what happens to the Missuses.

Don't you mean Newt Gingrich?
 
I think it's utterly ironic that a Trump hater is referencing Kenneth Starr and his witch-hunt. Let me guess: you've already got buyer's remorse.

Buyers remorse for what? I wasn't gullible enough to drink the "Trumpaide". I was able to clearly see that he was putting lipstick on a pig and convincing the weak minded that it was a beauty queen with a big nose.

Witch hunt my ass. If it were Clinton, you would be screaming for a special prosecutor. That said, I simply hold Trump accountable. I am truly sorry that you don't appear to have enough desire to do the same. Then again, I have never been a "hero-worshipper" like you guys are with Trump.
 
Last edited:
And, your point is?

My point was simply this: The Clinton investigation began with Whitewater and ended up with Lewinsky. As such, investigations sometimes end up in places other than what is expected. This one may well do the same.

Lets just say that if Mueller subpoenas Trump's tax returns, this investigation may take a significant detour. Just saying....:)
 
My point was simply this: The Clinton investigation began with Whitewater and ended up with Lewinsky. As such, investigations sometimes end up in places other than what is expected. This one may well do the same.

Lets just say that if Mueller subpoenas Trump's tax returns, this investigation may take a significant detour. Just saying....:)

In other words, you KNOW the Russia story is bull **** but have been pounding the table from your high chair demanding a special prosecutor to find something, anything on the guy you hate.
 
In other words, you KNOW the Russia story is bull **** but have been pounding the table from your high chair demanding a special prosecutor to find something, anything on the guy you hate.

You know very well that if a Democratic controlled Congress had been investigating Hillary, you Trump lovers would be screaming "Special Prosecutor" from the top of the Washington monument. The only thing more entertaining than your ridiculous defense of Trump is your blatant hypocrisy. The fact of the matter is you have NO idea whether Trump is guilty or not. None of us do at this point. What is obvious, except to the "weakest minded" of Trump lovers is that the investigation had to be turned over to a bipartisan entity.

Now, are you suggesting that Mueller isn't credible?

Not at all. In fact, the Russian involvement in our elections may well be just the tip of the iceberg. If Mueller finds nothing, then let that be the end of it.

that said, you sure seem to be much more worried about what Mueller may find than I am him not finding anything.
 
You know very well that if a Democratic controlled Congress had been investigating Hillary, you Trump lovers would be screaming "Special Prosecutor" from the top of the Washington monument. The only thing more entertaining than your ridiculous defense of Trump is your blatant hypocrisy. The fact of the matter is you have NO idea whether Trump is guilty or not. None of us do at this point. What is obvious, except to the "weakest minded" of Trump lovers is that the investigation had to be turned over to a bipartisan entity.

Now, are you suggesting that Mueller isn't credible?

Not at all. In fact, the Russian involvement in our elections may well be just the tip of the iceberg. If Mueller finds nothing, then let that be the end of it.

that said, you sure seem to be much more worried about what Mueller may find than I am him not finding anything.

You liberals seem to lack the ability to see the difference between attacking stupid left wing comments and positions and defending Trump. I did the former, you accused me of the latter. Plus, I said nothing about Mueller at all, yet you dishonestly pretend that I did. Here is the overall point. You guys on the left have no business running around calling anyone 'weak minded' or dishonest. Unless you are standing in front of a mirror.
 
My point was simply this: The Clinton investigation began with Whitewater and ended up with Lewinsky. As such, investigations sometimes end up in places other than what is expected. This one may well do the same.

Lets just say that if Mueller subpoenas Trump's tax returns, this investigation may take a significant detour. Just saying....:)

"Lets just say that if Mueller subpoenas Trump's tax returns, this investigation may take a significant detour. Just saying"

Probably not;

https://www.propublica.org/article/theres-no-guarantee-trumps-tax-returns-would-reveal-russia-ties

What Trump's Taxes Would Not Show About His Finances : NPR
 
Back
Top Bottom