• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time for a Special Prosecutor or Special Commission

Actually it does, if there is any evidence that the claim of collusion is true then the people need to be shown enough to justify a SP if one is to be installed.

Absolutely and, frankly, rather hilariously incorrect.

It just doesn't work that way.
 
This adolescent coward didn't even have enough hair on is little sack to Fire someone like a real man. He had to send his flunky to deliver a letter to an empty office, after he knew Comey was on the other side of the country.

Yea, real leadership :roll: no wonder his wife would rather enjoy herself without little hands in the bed. :lol:
 
Then that means a special prosecutor can be appointed to investigate Hillary's e-mails. Since Comey is tainted. The Democrat's demands to fire Comey is going to have some fun repercussions it seems. After all, Comey's judgement can't be trusted: the Democrats said so.

In lieu of all the glowing praise that Trump gave Comey for his investigation into the Clinton emails....and the on going investigations into his campaign, plus the timing of the Grand Jury subpoenas ...and the requests for financial documents from the US Treasurer office....Trump is going to have a very difficult time convincing the public that he fired Comey just because of Clinton's emails.
 
President Trump has been repeatedly interfering into an investigation that involves him, personally.

That is, in fact, probable cause simply in itself.

I am not aware of any attempt to interfere with investigations or in fact any actual interference that is anything other than Trump maintaining is innocence...which always needs to be allowed..... or in the case of removing Comey unproven allegation.
 
I am not aware of any attempt to interfere with investigations or in fact any actual interference that is anything other than Trump maintaining is innocence...which always needs to be allowed, or in the case of removing Comey unproven allegation.

By removing Comey, the head of the organization in charge of one of the investigations, trump is directly interfering with the investigations
 
There does not have to be "collusion" between Russian authorities and the Trump camp to warrant an investigation. Even if Trump had nothing to do with it, Russian interference in an American election is something that should be brought to light and not repeated.

Trump firing Comey does lead one to wonder, however, if Trump or his supporters weren't involved.
 
By removing Comey, the head of the organization in charge of one of the investigations, trump is directly interfering with the investigations

But it was not for that reason, Any harm that might come to investigating Trump (and none is known to exist) was a by product of Trump carrying out his duties as POTUS to make sure that the FBI has competent leadership...that cant wait forever for the FBI to conclude investigating Trump, it is already May and they have not provided any evidence that Trump did anything wrong, that's plenty long enough to wait.
 
But it was not for that reason, it was a by product of Trump carrying out his duties as POTUS to make sure that the FBI has competent leadership...that cant wait forever for the FBI to conclude investigating Trump, it is already may and they have not provided any evidence that Trump did anything wrong, that's plenty long enough.

Trump needs to appoint Comey's second in command, no one else.
 
Trump needs to appoint Comey's second in command, no one else.

Trump needs to appoint somebody good, somebody who wants to remove the politics from the FBI and someone that folks trust....or at least as trust as much as possible given how badly America is now fractured.
 
Trump needs to appoint somebody good, somebody who wants to remove the politics from the FBI and someone that folks trust....or at least as trust as much as possible given how badly America is now fractured.

In other words, not anyone suggested by trump or Jeff sessions.
 
Trump is too impetuous to have considered it but his firing of Comey may be the best guarantee we could get that the Russia investigation will be serious. Or the agents doing the digging may get the message Trump intended and fold the tent. We'll see. My bet is on the integrity of the agents, also the Senate and possibly the House, now that Trump has told them, "f... you." Probably not a coincidence that the senate committee issued supboenas today, its firsts of the investigation.
 
But it was not for that reason, Any harm that might come to investigating Trump (and none is known to exist) was a by product of Trump carrying out his duties as POTUS to make sure that the FBI has competent leadership...that cant wait forever for the FBI to conclude investigating Trump, it is already May and they have not provided any evidence that Trump did anything wrong, that's plenty long enough to wait.

Suuuuure it wasn't for that reason. Why, according to the White House, it was because Comey committed 'atrocities' against Clinton.

The Lock Her Up crowd clutching their pearls over "atrocities" directed at Secretary Clinton.

It's so transparent as to beggar the mind.
 
There does not have to be "collusion" between Russian authorities and the Trump camp to warrant an investigation. Even if Trump had nothing to do with it, Russian interference in an American election is something that should be brought to light and not repeated.

Trump firing Comey does lead one to wonder, however, if Trump or his supporters weren't involved.

What is there to investigate? The DNC got hacked, the DNC did crap work, they need to do better. As for who did it that has been investigated over many months by different people, I see no reason for another go by yet another set of people.

What else is there?
 
A greater injustice is standing silently your and not holding the government accountable. A special prosecutor is needed.

Ahh things are back to normal in Washington, a Republican holds the white house, and Accountability is now demanded, as it is the one last best virtue!
 
What is there to investigate? The DNC got hacked, the DNC did crap work, they need to do better. As for who did it that has been investigated over many months by different people, I see no reason for another go by yet another set of people.

What else is there?

An investigation that is not led by a republican crony of trump.
 
Ahh things are back to normal in Washington, a Republican holds the white house, and Accountability is now demanded, as it is the one last best virtue!

I am demanding that republicans in a branchs of government be accountable, not just the White House.
 
Suuuuure it wasn't for that reason. Why, according to the White House, it was because Comey committed 'atrocities' against Clinton.

The Lock Her Up crowd clutching their pearls over "atrocities" directed at Secretary Clinton.

It's so transparent as to beggar the mind.

If his work was atrocious then he should go, and a lot of people on both sides of the divide have said over many months that it was....what is your beef?
 
I am demanding that republicans in a branchs of government be accountable, not just the White House.

No no no, you've suddenly a new found desire for accountability in elected leaders, it's okay, you are only following the marching orders. Dem's hold office... meh really don't to look that hard, it's just a witch hunt, it's racist, sexist...

Republican in office? OMG THEY DID WHAT? INVESTIGATE!!!

Personally I'm waiting for someone to say the old classic "We have to investigate so we can find something."

Unless there is some no **** hard evidence of malfeasance, the Dem's are gonna be forced to run 2018 as the "Elect us to Impeach Trump" party, that will go over like a lead balloon.
 
No no no, you've suddenly a new found desire for accountability in elected leaders, it's okay, you are only following the marching orders. Dem's hold office... meh really don't to look that hard, it's just a witch hunt, it's racist, sexist...

Republican in office? OMG THEY DID WHAT? INVESTIGATE!!!

Personally I'm waiting for someone to say the old classic "We have to investigate so we can find something."

Unless there is some no **** hard evidence of malfeasance, the Dem's are gonna be forced to run 2018 as the "Elect us to Impeach Trump" party, that will go over like a lead balloon.

Democrats are going to run against the administration in power and the corruption it embodies.
 
I talk around DP enough about civility and justice that you damn well should not be surprised to find me doing it here.....

The rules can not be special for Trump just because a lot of people are pissed that We the People sent him to the White House.

And yet, what does the left support? A special 'lack of intent' clause invented for Hillary and her escape from justice.

Sure, sure. You can preach all about the rules, i.e. laws and their application, need to be consistent person to person, regardless of political party or standing in the community, but the US political left will never abide by the idea, as has been demonstrated time and time again.

So what do we have here?
No special prosecutor or investigation of Rice and unmasking.
No special prosecutor or investigation of NSA surveillance of US citizens.
No special prosecutor or investigation of the IRS and their obviously biased treatment of conservative groups.
No special prosecutor or investigation of Fast and Furious.

But a demand from the left for one for Trump on the flimsiest and highly suspect information on Trump.

Yeah, just goes to show that the political left doesn't think that everyone else's rules applies to them and theirs. It's all rather corrupt and disgusting if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
If his work was atrocious then he should go, and a lot of people on both sides of the divide have said over many months that it was....what is your beef?

My beef is that the WH is clearly lying about why he was terminated.
 
There does not have to be "collusion" between Russian authorities and the Trump camp to warrant an investigation. Even if Trump had nothing to do with it, Russian interference in an American election is something that should be brought to light and not repeated.

Trump firing Comey does lead one to wonder, however, if Trump or his supporters weren't involved.


Russia tried to interfere in the American election, just like America has tried to interfere in other countries elections. It appears to be a common activity of most countries. Why would it warrant an investigation when we know it has happened, and will probably happen in the future.....by Russia and by America...and by a few other countries as well.
 
Just when my head clears from all the loud echoes of, "Benghazi! Benghazi!" the clowns on the other side of the peanut gallery start their own chanting.

I need a lake. Two miles from the nearest logging road. And some Pink Floyd. Low volume.
 
We need a special committee and several prosecutors to investigate.....the Clintons, Obama and cronies. There's the real stories.

Keep dreaming. It'll never happen. Bill's and Hillary's escapes from justice over the last 30 years should have already taught you that.
 
President Trump has been repeatedly interfering into an investigation that involves him, personally.

That is, in fact, probable cause simply in itself.

You have some proof of that?
 
Back
Top Bottom