• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Question for Michael Flynn Supporters .....

Cigar

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Messages
5,368
Reaction score
2,117
Location
In The Crosshairs
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?
 
There's such thing as a "Michael Flynn Supporter"?
 
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

Do we have any Flynn supporters on here? Last I saw, Trump isn't supporting but rather fired Flynn. But, maybe I have that wrong and Flynn is still in the Trump Administration?
 
Do we have any Flynn supporters on here? Last I saw, Trump isn't supporting but rather fired Flynn. But, maybe I have that wrong and Flynn is still in the Trump Administration?

We do have posters who claim Flynn did absolutely nothing wrong and it's just a big leftist witch hunt. Not sure if they actually support Flynn, or just reflexively oppose anything a liberal says.
 
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

I have no idea what Trump is supposed to have lied about Re: Flynn, and no.

I know what Trump was trying to do Re: Flynn, I dont completely support him rolling so big especially when that roll crapped out so fast, but TRUMP is a known commodity, I should have expected him to continue to be a Premier "Go Big or Go Home" Guy, I have little right to bitch and moan.
 
Last edited:
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

From what I see so far, it's double down on the Trump fellating while chalking up what Yates is saying to partisan hackery. Oh, and bring up Hillary's emails, whenever possible. :lol:
 
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

Oh look another "I hate Pres. Trump!!" thread... Hyperbole, lies, hate, misrepresentation - all the usual garbage.
 
Oh look another "I hate Pres. Trump!!" thread... Hyperbole, lies, hate, misrepresentation - all the usual garbage.

Well, at least you are living up to your screen name, Faithful Servant. Trump needs you now more than ever. :lol:
 
We do have posters who claim Flynn did absolutely nothing wrong and it's just a big leftist witch hunt. Not sure if they actually support Flynn, or just reflexively oppose anything a liberal says.

I haven't seen anyone supporting Flynn. I have seen people bitching about the way the left is using Flynn's actions to beat Trump about the head politically, and on that they have at least a small amount of truth to stand on. What Flynn did was probably illegal and he should be treated accordingly when it comes to paying the price for the choices he's made - see my below. Trump fired him, and that seems to be lost on some.

However, if I ever see anyone supporting Flynn, I will immediately point out that they are supporting a person that is, IMHO, a high ranking military officer that broke numerous laws, and may have committed Treason or at the very least committed Conspiracy to commit Treasonous Acts by giving or promising to give aid and comfort to Russia while in an official position to do so. The man should be, at the least, retroactively reduced in rank to E-1, his discharged changed to "Other than Honorable" (or changed to "Dishonorable" if he is prosecuted and found guilty) and his retirement pay should reflect both.
 
Just an observation; if the question in't for you, why are you trying to answer it? ;)
 
Oh look another "I hate Pres. Trump!!" thread... Hyperbole, lies, hate, misrepresentation - all the usual garbage.

Oh look another "I love Pres. Trump!!" Post... Hyperbole, lies, love, misrepresentation - all the usual garbage.
 
I haven't seen anyone supporting Flynn. I have seen people bitching about the way the left is using Flynn's actions to beat Trump about the head politically, and on that they have at least a small amount of truth to stand on. What Flynn did was probably illegal and he should be treated accordingly when it comes to paying the price for the choices he's made - see my below. Trump fired him, and that seems to be lost on some.

However, if I ever see anyone supporting Flynn, I will immediately point out that they are supporting a person that is, IMHO, a high ranking military officer that broke numerous laws, and may have committed Treason or at the very least committed Conspiracy to commit Treasonous Acts by giving or promising to give aid and comfort to Russia while in an official position to do so. The man should be, at the least, retroactively reduced in rank to E-1, his discharged changed to "Other than Honorable" (or changed to "Dishonorable" if he is prosecuted and found guilty) and his retirement pay should reflect both.

President Trump was informed of Flynn's illegal activity 18 days before he did anything. He only fired Flynn when that illegal activity went public.

He didn't care that Flynn lied to collude with the Russians. As far as we can tell, that was actually a perk for him. That's the problem here.
 
Oh look another "I love Pres. Trump!!" Post... Hyperbole, lies, love, misrepresentation - all the usual garbage.

Well it's been a 8 Year Education from the experts of Hate, so I'd understand why you'd see the irony. ;)
 
I am not a Flynn supporter but I will reply to this (nonsense?) thread none the less.

The uproar over the Flynn affair is proof that you can be accused of collusion to rig an election by pointing to alleged shady actions taken after the election was over. Flynn lied and was fired (asked to resign?) for it - proof that Trump is evil and causes otherwise honest and upstanding folks to anonymously release classified information to the press.

After nearly a year the FBI has yet to indict a single election rigging collusion suspect from the many that we are told absolutely must have existed on the Trump campaign staff with close ties to the Russians. Why the congressional investigations can't find even one of them or anyone in the INTEL or DOJ (past or present) to say that such collusion even existed baffles all but the demorats.
 
Last edited:
The uproar over the Flynn affair is proof that you can be accused of collusion to rig an election by pointing to alleged shady actions taken after the election was over. Flynn lied and was fired (asked to resign?) for it - proof that Trump is evil and causes otherwise honest and upstanding folks to anonymously release classified information to the press.

After nearly a year the FBI has yet to indict a single election rigging collusion suspect from the many that we are told absolutely must have existed on Trump campaign staff with close ties to the Russians. Why the congressional investigations can't find even one of them or anyone in the INTEL or DOJ (past or present) to say that they even existed baffles all but the demorats.

You don't see a problem with asserting that nothing has happened yet is somehow proof of innocence?

Here's a trick, try considering the allegations are about Hillary Clinton instead of a "True" American, a republican.
 
You don't see a problem with asserting that nothing has happened yet is somehow proof of innocence?

Here's a trick, try considering the allegations are about Hillary Clinton instead of a "True" American, a republican.

You don't see that a presumption of innocence requires no proof at all. It is guilt which requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt - not innocence.
 
The uproar over the Flynn affair is proof that you can be accused of collusion to rig an election by pointing to alleged shady actions taken after the election was over. Flynn lied and was fired (asked to resign?) for it - proof that Trump is evil and causes otherwise honest and upstanding folks to anonymously release classified information to the press.

lol, a number of people involved in the Trump campaign had questionable dealings with Russia for years prior, including Flynn. He was told his dealings with Russia would be picked up by intelligence, and he persisted. A national security lead, being paid by Russia, buddy buddy with Russia, our more notable adversary in the world... this should ****ing bother everyone as it is.

Trump nay have had no idea about any of this, making him and his administration either look like idiots who had no vetting, or they had no care in hiring people who had engaged in regularly behaviors that looked terrible political, and reasonably, given their positions.

When directly informed about his lying, Trump did NOTHING.
When fake-news-media broke the real news story, that wasn't fake after all...only then did they fire him.

In reality, whether an actual crime was committed or not is entirely irrelevant. If you're seen every night stumbling out of an escorts hotel room, you may not have committed any crime, but it looks bad just the same. Being cool with that, and acting like "well no crime is committed therefore what's wrong!?" is absurd.

The Trump administration has demonstrated it can't staff its positions, it's demonstrated it has filled what few positions it could staff, with rejects, sketchy characters, people under federal investigation, liars, and of course the ever popular family-first types. Having no evidence of Flynn committing a crime is the least of the problems facing that administration. That so many apologists defend the admin given all this, I really never would have imagined.
 
Just an observation; if the question in't for you, why are you trying to answer it? ;)

Just an observation, if you make a post on a public forum, anyone can choose to answer. Especially when your question is so vague and perhaps targeting a non existent group in the first place.
 
President Trump was informed of Flynn's illegal activity 18 days before he did anything. He only fired Flynn when that illegal activity went public.

He didn't care that Flynn lied to collude with the Russians. As far as we can tell, that was actually a perk for him. That's the problem here.

You don't have a clue what he did or didn't care about. Neither do I. When you make conclusions off of what you THINK he felt or thought, then the conclusion you reach is dubious at best. I don't like the guy, either one of them as a matter of fact. However, I'm not going to accuse the sitting President, whether it was Obama or now Trump, of illegal actions or motivations without actual proof of such actions or motivations.

But, you guys continue to do what you feel comfortable doing.
 
You don't have a clue what he did or didn't care about. Neither do I. When you make conclusions off of what you THINK he felt or thought, then the conclusion you reach is dubious at best. I don't like the guy, either one of them as a matter of fact. However, I'm not going to accuse the sitting President, whether it was Obama or now Trump, of illegal actions or motivations without actual proof of such actions or motivations.

But, you guys continue to do what you feel comfortable doing.

Yates testified today saying that she simply assumed that President Trump's administration would immediately respond to her information about Flynn. Instead, they waited 18 days. They only reacted when some of the information became public.

Why would anyone become aware of that but not react to it? Do you have an answer for that question that DOESN'T look horrible for this administration?
 
You don't see that a presumption of innocence requires no proof at all. It is guilt which requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt - not innocence.

They are to be legally considered innocent- that doesn't mean that they are genuinely innocent. Hell, even if they aren't found guilty, that's not proof of innocence.

You realize how hard it is to prove innocence? It would take like, half a dozen congressional investigations or something.
 
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

I didn't know Michael Flynn had supporters.
 
Do feel like The President Trump Lied to you in support of Michael Flynn?

At what point are you going to stop believing in President Trump support of liars?

I'm confused. Your thread title asks a question to Flynn supporters but your post text asks a question to Trump supporters.
 
They are to be legally considered innocent- that doesn't mean that they are genuinely innocent. Hell, even if they aren't found guilty, that's not proof of innocence.

You realize how hard it is to prove innocence? It would take like, half a dozen congressional investigations or something.

So, you are admitting that Hillary was guilty?
 
Back
Top Bottom