• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump 'planning smear campaign' against Sally Yates

So...the long anticipated Yates testimony that had leftists salivating at her pending revelations yielded...exactly nothing. So...WTF...why not. Make up some **** about the Trump team smearing her (for...no reason apparently).

Earlier in the thread the question was asked how did Flynn's meeting with a Russian impact the election. Answer...well...lets take the answer from one of the ranking senate democrats...



Yes...this Russian investigation is yielding TREMENDOUS insight.
 
VanceMack said:
So...the long anticipated Yates testimony that had leftists salivating at her pending revelations yielded...exactly nothing. So...WTF...why not. Make up some **** about the Trump team smearing her (for...no reason apparently).

Earlier in the thread the question was asked how did Flynn's meeting with a Russian impact the election. Answer...well...lets take the answer from one of the ranking senate democrats...



Yes...this Russian investigation is yielding TREMENDOUS insight.
Click to expand...


Oh, dear. It seems to have escaped your attention that the investigations are still ongoing, and the house and senate ones are essentially just getting started.

Not to worry, there's still plenty to come

You seem awfully upset.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
What date did Flynn lie to Pence and what date did Yates pass word up about it?
Click to expand...

Yates warned White House that Trump's national security advisor 'could be blackmailed' by Moscow

Flynn, a retired Army three-star general, was forced to resign as President Trump’s top national security aide 18 days after Yates first alerted the White House on Jan. 26, but only after news stories revealed the existence of a transcript of Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The diplomat’s calls were recorded as part of routine U.S. intelligence monitoring of ranking foreign officials.​

Almost three weeks. And then only because it started getting into the news.
 
poweRob said:
Yates warned White House that Trump's national security advisor 'could be blackmailed' by Moscow

Flynn, a retired Army three-star general, was forced to resign as President Trump’s top national security aide 18 days after Yates first alerted the White House on Jan. 26, but only after news stories revealed the existence of a transcript of Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The diplomat’s calls were recorded as part of routine U.S. intelligence monitoring of ranking foreign officials.​

Almost three weeks. And then only because it started getting into the news.
Click to expand...

But then again once Flynn knew that Trump knew there was no possibility of being blackmailed over it....a huge hole on the story the Elites are spinning.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
But then again once Flynn knew that Trump knew there was no possibility of being blackmailed over it....a huge hole on the story the Elites are spinning.
Click to expand...

Could be blackmailed to the press instead of trump. To any number of law enforcement officials willing to prosecute. Not just trump himself.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Oh, dear. It seems to have escaped your attention that the investigations are still ongoing, and the house and senate ones are essentially just getting started.

Not to worry, there's still plenty to come

You seem awfully upset.
Click to expand...
:lamo

You just really believe that is an effective debate tactic, dont you? Thats precious!

No no...I WANT those investigations. I want a full on special prosecutor. I watched a good portion of Clapper and Yates testimony and I watched them stammer and stutter. believe me...no one wants a FULL no holds barred investigation of this whole shebang more than me.
 
poweRob said:
Could be blackmailed to the press instead of trump. To any number of law enforcement officials willing to prosecute. Not just trump himself.
Click to expand...

I am not aware that Flynn did anything illegal, so no to Law Enforcement, and 80-90% of the press that Trump gets is negative press so I am not buying there either.
 
Winston said:
The FBI has an open investigation on Trump right now. And people of congress have established they've seen definitive evidence of collusion. How is it that Roger Stone passed information about future wikileaks drops to Trump, whose big mouth is his downfall yet again?
Click to expand...

actually wrong.

they have said there was no collusion between trump and Russia.
 
VanceMack said:
So...the long anticipated Yates testimony that had leftists salivating at her pending revelations yielded...exactly nothing. So...WTF...why not. Make up some **** about the Trump team smearing her (for...no reason apparently).

Earlier in the thread the question was asked how did Flynn's meeting with a Russian impact the election. Answer...well...lets take the answer from one of the ranking senate democrats...

Yes...this Russian investigation is yielding TREMENDOUS insight.
Click to expand...
so a rachal maddow 2.0 huh
wow never would have thought that one.

these people are crazy.
 
Renae said:
"Flynn was an AGGGENT" the Russian HACKED Hillary to help TRUUUUUUMMMP!!!!!

You guys go ahead and spend the next 8 years chasing that dog, please. The whole "Trump is a Russian agent we just need to find the proof" is like the Birthers of Obama's years. Only instead of starting out with some "hmm let's look at this" and then dropped into the fringe right, ya'll are pushing this mainstream left message. It's amusing.
Click to expand...

Saying something in a stupid voice doesn't make the message, itself, stupid.

Flynn warned Russia about the sanctions. President Trump tried to cover it up. It's bad, and getting worse.
 
VanceMack said:
:lamo

You just really believe that is an effective debate tactic, dont you? Thats precious!
Click to expand...

No, I don't. I'm just making a dispassionate observation.
No no...I WANT those investigations. I want a full on special prosecutor. I watched a good portion of Clapper and Yates testimony and I watched them stammer and stutter. believe me...no one wants a FULL no holds barred investigation of this whole shebang more than me.
Click to expand...

Nah. You're terrified of one.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
There is no case law which argues that Flynn committed an illegal act, thus one can not say that he did.

Its a theory, yet to be proven.
Click to expand...

We were discussing his ability to be blackmailed. That would be criminal behavior if he were regardless of what you think about the link I followed up with.
 
ludin said:
so a rachal maddow 2.0 huh
wow never would have thought that one.

these people are crazy.
Click to expand...
Seriously. There is apparently an article and a thread and a bunch of poutrage over an allegation on a website that Trump or others may call Yates a 'Democrat Operative'.

Well...at least the leftists got SOMETHING out of the deal.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, I don't. I'm just making a dispassionate observation.

Nah. You're terrified of one.
Click to expand...
To the contrary. Ive said so from the beginning. Let the chips fall...but let them ALL fall. Katie bar the door...and burn that place down. Put people under oath, no exemptions, no plea's, no immunity.
 
Winston said:
The FBI has an open investigation on Trump right now. And people of congress have established they've seen definitive evidence of collusion. How is it that Roger Stone passed information about future wikileaks drops to Trump, whose big mouth is his downfall yet again?
Click to expand...

You and your ilk can parrot this lie as often as you like. It'll still be a lie.
 
VanceMack said:
To the contrary. Ive said so from the beginning. Let the chips fall...but let them ALL fall. Katie bar the door...and burn that place down. Put people under oath, no exemptions, no plea's, no immunity.
Click to expand...

OK, I'll take your word for it in that case.
 
VanceMack said:
Seriously. There is apparently an article and a thread and a bunch of poutrage over an allegation on a website that Trump or others may call Yates a 'Democrat Operative'.

Well...at least the leftists got SOMETHING out of the deal.
Click to expand...

Well I was referring to once again the lack of actual or even remotely anything that is outside what we already know.
people are testifying over nothing except already known information.
 
ludin said:
Well I was referring to once again the lack of actual or even remotely anything that is outside what we already know.
people are testifying over nothing except already known information.
Click to expand...
Sure...I got it...The Capones Vault of testimony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom