Hillary’s election loss excuse means one thing — she’s running in 2020

Grand Mal said:

How can I say that? That's the reason I'm saying that.



Ya know, the Republican Party nominating Trump might be written off as a flier, a weird case of celebrity adulation over-riding saner heads, but if the Democratic Party nominates Hillary Clinton again you can go to bed that night knowing that the US electoral system has been flushed down the crapper and the Presidency is becoming a figurehead position.

As for your last sentence, if you accept the premise of Trump being a terrible candidate what if the Democrats nominate somebody who is actually a viable presidential candidate? I can see a scenario where the Republican Party turns it's back on an incumbent and nominates someone else. Would be a good step in the direction of returning sanity to American politics.

Click to expand...

Obama was the circus act, the rabbit from the hat. Geraldine Ferraro summed it up pretty good (paraphrasing), he's got no qualifications, virtually no background... if he wasn't black he'd not even make it to the podium for the primaries.

Trump is an answer to Obama, and he addressed something nobody else would and did so unapologetically... illegal immigration.

Trump won a record number of Republican Party votes (if I recall correctly). He did it with all the Demokrats shooting at him, and Republican Party "elite" too.

He still kicked ass.

You Demokrats don't get it, and that's fine.

Meanwhile, back at the DNC and in Chappaqua, NY... The Clinton Crime Family is gearing up for another kick at the can.

The Russian BS, and Comey gives Hillary an excuse to run... have to say... it was a bit of brilliant skullduggery on the part of The Clintons. They started this idiotic BS, the Leftists jumped into the fire with both feet, and now can't get out.

They can't turn around and say... Hillary... that Russian stuff isn't true, you lost because you're a lame candidate. Not possible. ROTFLOL... they're screwed of they do or don't... and Hillary get's a third crack (also because there is no bench).

ROTFLOL... too funny.

Grand Mal said:

You sure this is the right forum to post your wet-dream fantasies?

Seriously. She lost to Donald Freakin' Trump. There isn't an organisation of any stripe that would back that kind of loser.
My neighbour's dog could beat Donald Freakin' Trump in an election and he's not only not American, he died last week.
You guys are getting giddy.

Click to expand...

17 Republicans and The World's Smartest Demokrat with a former President as husband couldn't beat Trump.

Who's fantasizing?

Had to laugh... they tried the "They go low, we go high", and during the closing weeks of the campaign, Trump was disciplined... on message, hammering ObamaKare, Illegal Immigration, Taxes, Economy... Hillary and Obama? They were low, as they had no message, nothing to sell, and 8-years of utter failure.

I guess Hillary, Bill and Obama combined are dumber than your neighbor's dog.

Mach said:

You do realize the right has far less truthful propaganda, with right wing media leading the way, right? No, I'm sure you don't.

I hope she doesn't run, but the thread is about how crazy people are saying she must be to try and run. I'm simply pointing out that in her mind, she was close, and with Trump's buffoonery, she probably feels like she has a shot. And if Dems elect her, it will depend on who is running against her. You know, like objectively looking at it from her point of view, without the teen angst.

If Trump does run again, you really think he can beat *anyone*? Maybe. I don't know, it sure seems like he's annoyed nearly everyone except his cult following. I think incumbents often have the edge, but that's' if Trump runs again. If he does not, I think the momentum can be lost, and with his savaging of the moderates and middle class throughout his term, he'll set up a Dem potentially. Just a guess, as we saw thought, anything could happen. If dems put a poor choice, and republicans have a great choice, Rs could get a shot at putting someone more aware of reality in office, to be sure.

Click to expand...

They guy who predicted every election since 84 or so said he had something like a 94% chance of reelection after he won.
Time will tell.

The Right, doesn't have to lie about what it wants... we'd like Liberty from government... the left seeks the opposite, and must lie to achieve their goals. ObamaKare for example... one lie after another from Jonathan Gruber revealing their lies, to Obama's lies about cost and keeping your MD, and then the press with their Pom-poms.

See the quote in my signature line?
Demokrats talking about the dimwitted base they created... so they can fool them... easily. And they do.

eohrnberger said:

How can you say that when the DNC president is already at least admitting that it's a possibility?



My feeling is that if Hillary runs again, she will lose again for many of the same reasons and flaws that plagued her 2016 presidential campaign.

If you accept the premise of Trump being a terrible candidate and Hillary lost to him, how is that going to change with a potentially much better GOP candidate?

Click to expand...

Hillary was the smartest woman in the world... until she lost. ROTFLOL...

The Demokrats have dug themselves a hole... a big one, and Hillary is climbing out of it over their corpses... inch by inch... LOL.

Their biggest mistake was laying blame for the loss on Russia and Comey. Now she's free to run.