• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: My first 100 days are 'just about the most successful' in US history

I'll take that bet. It would be an interesting study anyway, especially since you don't consider Trump a RINO yet.

I have never denied Trump is a RINO. what you seem to forget is that a Trump administration means lots of real republicans are going to be part of running the executive branch which, to me and others who want less government, is a far better scenario than Hillary's cohorts in power.
 
I have never denied Trump is a RINO. what you seem to forget is that a Trump administration means lots of real republicans are going to be part of running the executive branch which, to me and others who want less government, is a far better scenario than Hillary's cohorts in power.

But the same RINOs are there too. And the so-called "Real Republicans" have minority power in the current lineup in the White House :) Trump didn't bash the Freedom caucus for no reason.
 
I have never denied Trump is a RINO. what you seem to forget is that a Trump administration means lots of real republicans are going to be part of running the executive branch which, to me and others who want less government, is a far better scenario than Hillary's cohorts in power.

Looks to me more like those of your ilk just want failed government.
 
I have never denied Trump is a RINO. what you seem to forget is that a Trump administration means lots of real republicans are going to be part of running the executive branch which, to me and others who want less government, is a far better scenario than Hillary's cohorts in power.


What trumps Administration actually means is people like you get to defend a dumbass
 
But the same RINOs are there too. And the so-called "Real Republicans" have minority power in the current lineup in the White House :) Trump didn't bash the Freedom caucus for no reason.

so tell me-what is a better administration-a bunch of real small government conservatives mixed with some RINOS and Neocons vs an administration of Crony Capitalists, welfare socialists and some hard core collectivists?

because that was the choice
 
so tell me-what is a better administration-a bunch of real small government conservatives mixed with some RINOS and Neocons vs an administration of Crony Capitalists, welfare socialists and some hard core collectivists?

because that was the choice


What you got is a bunch of Goldman Sachs types
 
What trumps Administration actually means is people like you get to defend a dumbass

and people like you can whine and whine and whine about your even bigger dumbass -who managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory TWICE in a row-losing an election that was stacked in her favor
 
What you got is a bunch of Goldman Sachs types

OMG-if Hillary had won, we wouldn't have had those types?

that might be the dumbest comment I have seen from you. Hillary was Goldman-Sucks candidate.
 
and people like you can whine and whine and whine about your even bigger dumbass -who managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory TWICE in a row-losing an election that was stacked in her favor


I don't whine about past history she's done and gone. You still are in a position where you're trying to defend Carrot Top
 
so tell me-what is a better administration-a bunch of real small government conservatives mixed with some RINOS and Neocons vs an administration of Crony Capitalists, welfare socialists and some hard core collectivists?

because that was the choice

The economy did better under Clinton and Obama than it did under Poppa Bush, Baby Bush and the first few months of this Orange Buffoon. GOP have proven that their policies are disastrous time and again.
 
I don't whine about past history she's done and gone. You still are in a position where you're trying to defend Carrot Top

Turtle has Hillaphobia.
 
I have never denied Trump is a RINO. what you seem to forget is that a Trump administration means lots of real republicans are going to be part of running the executive branch which, to me and others who want less government, is a far better scenario than Hillary's cohorts in power.

But I thought the establishment were the RINOs? So much spin I'm getting dizzy trying to keep track of who is and isn't a Republican.
 
so tell me-what is a better administration-a bunch of real small government conservatives mixed with some RINOS and Neocons vs an administration of Crony Capitalists, welfare socialists and some hard core collectivists?

because that was the choice

Your thesis is wrong. It's a mix of RINOS and Neocons and a small group of small government conservatives who are also conspiracy theorists and many of whom have ties to mother Russia. As I have said, I liked the people Trump put in charge of the various government agencies, I just believe that the other Republicans who ran would have made similar moves without sounding like a complete idiot throughout the entire process. For that he has no one else to blame but himself.

SO I wrote in one of those Republicans. I didn't want to vote for a platform that was completely idiotic. (Trump's)
I also didn't want to vote for a platform that lacked well anything of substance. (Hillary's)
 
OMG-if Hillary had won, we wouldn't have had those types?

that might be the dumbest comment I have seen from you. Hillary was Goldman-Sucks candidate.

But..but...Trump is against the elite!
 
OMG-if Hillary had won, we wouldn't have had those types?

that might be the dumbest comment I have seen from you. Hillary was Goldman-Sucks candidate.


You may well be correct we'll never know but the bottom line is with Trump we actually got the Goldman Sachs types
 
The economy did better under Clinton and Obama than it did under Poppa Bush, Baby Bush and the first few months of this Orange Buffoon. GOP have proven that their policies are disastrous time and again.
smart people realize that presidential policies don't immediately manifest themselves in the economy. Clinton was a beneficiary of the dot com bubble that served as bandage that covered the idiocy of his tax hikes.
 
Your thesis is wrong. It's a mix of RINOS and Neocons and a small group of small government conservatives who are also conspiracy theorists and many of whom have ties to mother Russia. As I have said, I liked the people Trump put in charge of the various government agencies, I just believe that the other Republicans who ran would have made similar moves without sounding like a complete idiot throughout the entire process. For that he has no one else to blame but himself.

SO I wrote in one of those Republicans. I didn't want to vote for a platform that was completely idiotic. (Trump's)
I also didn't want to vote for a platform that lacked well anything of substance. (Hillary's)

"Lack of substance" was the last election in a nutshell.
 
You may well be correct we'll never know but the bottom line is with Trump we actually got the Goldman Sachs types

are you not aware of the fact that Hillary was the candidate Goldman Sucks supported? do you have any clue how much money GS gave Hillary for access, figuring she was going to win?
 
Dumb right-wingers should have thought of that when Obama was in office what you have right now is a what goes around comes around situation
 
I don't necessarily disagree with turtle I really didn't like Hillary at all the problem is now we have Trump

well you should be quoting the Stones song "salt of the earth"

I suspect you are sharp enough to get the reference
 
Back
Top Bottom