• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Coming To Agreement On Health Care By Gutting Preexisting Conditions

chuckiechan said:
I suggest that it is a bargaining chip for the Freedom Caucus. Including existing conditions is pretty much universally popular. So it's a bluff.
Click to expand...

A bluff by whom? The axing of pre-existing condition protections has now been put into legislative language and the leadership is whipping votes for it.

VanceMack said:
"Preexisting Conditions" was one of the biggest flaws in the Affordable Care Act. Its illogical at least. There is a better solution for people with preexisting conditions...namely medicare. Its akin to buying a car, choosing to not get insurance, wrecking the care, THEN going in and signing up for 'insurance' so they will fix your car. Thats not 'insurance'.
Click to expand...

You're not arguing for pre-existing conditions so much as deterrents to adverse selection (like an individual mandate and open enrollment periods).
 
Greenbeard said:
A bluff by whom? The axing of pre-existing condition protections has now been put into legislative language and the leadership is whipping votes for it.



You're not arguing for pre-existing conditions so much as deterrents to adverse selection (like an individual mandate and open enrollment periods).
Click to expand...

No no...I'm quite certain I am arguing as to the stupidity of passing and/or endorsing policy re preexisting conditions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Greenbeard said:
A bluff by whom? The axing of pre-existing condition protections has now been put into legislative language and the leadership is whipping votes for it.

You're not arguing for pre-existing conditions so much as deterrents to adverse selection (like an individual mandate and open enrollment periods).
Click to expand...

Well, you are just going to have wait Until a deal is reached.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom