• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

73% want Independent Russian investigation

Mach said:
Obviously this is a national issue, that you think it's "any time they feel like it" is just absurdity.
Benghazi, over nothing nearly as important (Hillary's email server...the actual Benghazi attack had already been investigated), was done how many times....5? 7? 9?

We want ONE independent investigation on a matter of potential treason, collusion with a foreign power, efforts to undermine the U.S. election, bribery, blackmail, etc. Hardly apples to apples, and yet you were fine with 101 investigations and one, and want zero of the other? Who are you fooling.
Click to expand...

Its a national issue in lib la la land.

Trump supporters have no interest in it

But since you go on to demand not a fishing expidetion but instead an entire fishing/hunting safari about trump its obvious that you will never quit

So keep demanding and we will keep saying no
 
Last edited:
Mach said:
Obviously this is a national issue, that you think it's "any time they feel like it" is just absurdity.
Benghazi, over nothing nearly as important (Hillary's email server...the actual Benghazi attack had already been investigated), was done how many times....5? 7? 9?

We want ONE independent investigation on a matter of potential treason, collusion with a foreign power, efforts to undermine the U.S. election, bribery, blackmail, etc. Hardly apples to apples, and yet you were fine with 101 investigations and one, and want zero of the other? Who are you fooling.
Click to expand...

The Obama administration and Hillary lied from the get go about Benghazi, "a video made em do it". The first hearings where just normal Congressional oversight then the realization set in that Hillary was not complying with producing relevant docs. Then her personal email server came to light. If HRC had used a state dot gov email address she'd most likely be POTUS now. Hillary has no one to blame but herself. The cover up of her server did her in.
 
Mac77 said:
Meaning liberals can pull a wild hare out of their ass and call for an investigation/finshing expedition on trump anytime they feel like it.
Click to expand...

That's funny after the repeated flogging of Benghazi. Let me guess -- it's OK if you're a Republican.
 
Mac77 said:
Its a national issue in lib la la land.

Trump supporters have no interest in it

But since you go on to demand not a fishing expidetion but instead and entire fishing/hunting safari about trump

So keep demanding and we will keep saying no
Click to expand...

It's a national issue in the eyes of the FBI, and no amount of whining and wishful thinking will alter that fact.
 
Kobie said:
That's funny after the repeated flogging of Benghazi. Let me guess -- it's OK if you're a Republican.
Click to expand...

Hillary and obama abandoned the Americans there to die without lifting a finger to save them
 
Tanngrisnir said:
It's a national issue in the eyes of the FBI, and no amount of whining and wishful thinking will alter that fact.
Click to expand...

Flip-Flop Comey who seems to have no clue what he's doing from one day to the next?

Don't make me laugh
 
Mac77 said:
Flip-Flop Comey who seems to have no clue what he's doing from one day to the next?

Don't make me laugh
Click to expand...

LOL! The FBI is still investigating, no matter how much you pout and stomp your feet in impotent rage.
 
hanger4 said:
The sheer volume of Benghazi hearing.was all on Hillary. She failed to comply.

One doesn't need a special prosecutor, one just needs to read the surveillance transcripts.
Click to expand...

Not one single thing you said made sense.
 
haymarket said:
For nearly three out of four Americans to come to the conclusion that we need an independent commission to truly get to the bottom of the Russian - Trump collision in the 2016 election is a sign of the wisdom of the American people.
Click to expand...

No, its just the opinion of 3 Americans, which doesnt mean anything. Media polls are bull****, and are not how political policy should be determined. Furthermore, its not even 73%. Its 54%, and nearly all of that is Democrats. The 74% is a subset of the 54%.

Still, a majority of Americans — 54 percent — believe that Congress should investigate whether there was contact between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, which is essentially unchanged from February's NBC/WSJ poll.

That includes 84 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of independents who want to see this congressional investigation, but just 21 percent of Republican respondents who want it.
Click to expand...
 
So far I have yet to see any real evidence that it was the Russians that hacked the Democrats. The same American intelligence agencies also told us Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. They're still looking for that evidence.

Whoever hacked the Democrats opened the box that showed what a corrupt, elitist, snobbish, back-stabbing cartel the Democrat Party is. So who really blew the election, the hackers or the Democrats? How ironic is it that the truth got the great exaggerator and liar Donald Trump elected, huh? I always knew he was more honest than Hillary, ha, ha, ha!
 
PIPEWRENCH said:
No we need to end the witch hunts. Provide evidence to a judge for a subpoena of the documents needed to prove your case and do your job according to the law. If you do not have evidence or know which documents you need to prove your case it is a witch hunt. Plus when you subpoena documents and there is no evidence of wrong doing then the witch hunt ends until you have evidence. We have a constitution and a bill of rights that even the left should have to follow.
Click to expand...

What is it we will find out that you are so afraid of?
 
hanger4 said:
What part of this;

"Nowhere can I fine he claims anything could be found in Trump's tax returns short of charitable contributions, tax rate, amount of taxes paid or how much he made in a given year."

didn't you understand ??
Click to expand...

What part of all the statements of Johnston are not on the internet do you not understand?
 
Mac77 said:
Trunp's tax returns are just a talking point for democrats
Click to expand...

Actually they are a legal obligation for all Americans earning money.

What is it we will find out that you are so afraid of?
 
jonny5 said:
No, its just the opinion of 3 Americans, which doesnt mean anything. Media polls are bull****, and are not how political policy should be determined. Furthermore, its not even 73%. Its 54%, and nearly all of that is Democrats. The 74% is a subset of the 54%.
Click to expand...

That makes no sense given how the poll was taken and the science behind polls. The Wall Street Journal is not exactly Democratic.
 
haymarket said:
What part of all the statements of Johnston are not on the internet do you not understand?
Click to expand...

OK, there's no proof of what you claim David Johnston said. I'll stick with the tax experts of which there is proof.
 
haymarket said:
Actually they are a legal obligation for all Americans earning money.

What is it we will find out that you are so afraid of?
Click to expand...

1) Yes they are, but you won't find some nefarious connection of Ruskie collusion in them.

2) Personally I could care less seeing his or other polys tax returns. They give no more insight than irrelevant talking points to partisans.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! The FBI is still investigating, no matter how much you pout and stomp your feet in impotent rage.
Click to expand...

Yes, that is the rumor

Its a pity they didn't put that much effort into investigating hillary
 
haymarket said:
What is it we will find out that you are so afraid of?
Click to expand...

I don't think you wil find anything

But libs will belch a lot of smoke looking for something as they have already
 
You know, back when I was a teenager, my mother once told me "if you have nothing to hide you have no reason to lock your door within our own house". Of course I insisted I had nothing at all to hide I just wanted my privacy, and of course that was bull****. I didn't want her to find my porn. Before I had acquired porn and started hiding it under my dresser I had never locked my door. It didn't even occur to me to.

Now I heard some pundit a month or so ago say, "If the Trump administration really wants this to be over with, really wants to be right in the eyes of the people and dispel these doubts and suspicions, they would just throw open the investigatory doors and lay it all out there. Let the committees see everything, answer every question, show the tax returns, reveal the business connections, and give strait answers to all of the questions. If there is nothing to hide this should be no problem. The fact that they aren't, the fact that they are blocking and concealing and obfuscating at every turn can only mean one of two things, either A: That Trump and his administration entered the most high profile job on earth, a job where transparency and the trust of the people is of the utmost importance, and are willing to compromise that transparency and trust to hide nothing of significance, which makes them stupid. Or B: they are willing to compromise that transparency and trust to hide something of significance, in which case we damn well need to know what that something is."

We were all teenagers, we know we didn't start locking our doors until we got old enough to have things we didn't want our parents to see. This isn't complex, this isn't difficult to understand, this is basic transparent human nature on display, but of course his defenders will somehow find a way to not see the glaringly obvious. They've gotten quite good at that.
 
Mac77 said:
Yes, that is the rumor

Its a pity they didn't put that much effort into investigating hillary
Click to expand...

This thread IS NOT ABOUT CLINTON.
 
Mac77 said:
I don't think you wil find anything

But libs will belch a lot of smoke looking for something as they have already
Click to expand...

So what are you afraid of an independent commission will discover about Trump and Russia?
 
hanger4 said:
OK, there's no proof of what you claim David Johnston said. I'll stick with the tax experts of which there is proof.
Click to expand...

You are being intentionally obtuse. I gave you the proof that Johnston wants to see the Trump tax returns and why he wants them and what he expects to see in them.

This is just you playing ostrich.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom