• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another Trump Campaign Chair Goes Down

I apologize, I assumed that those reading my earlier post with the quote from the Cincinnati newspaper would be able to understand the point I was trying to make.

Tp clarify for those who were unable to comprehend the words: I wrote -- "there are some rational people in the Republican Party ". These words were a reference to the words found in the article, to wit -- "some local Republicans, including former local school board member Mike Combs, started a website, GOPFacts.org. called Nolan, "one of Campbell County's most vehement racists."

I then wrote --"they appear to be a minority". The "they" being the group of local Republicans. The reason they appear to be a minority is shown by the last sentence quoted -- "Campbell County voters in November elected Nolan to the county school board." I hope this clarifies the intention of my words.

well no it was not clear, the OP wants to bridge a trump connect to this person, and i have not seen it yet.
 
well no it was not clear, the OP wants to bridge a trump connect to this person, and i have not seen it yet.

You replied to MY post, not to any other person's comments. Naturally I assumed your words were in regards to what I wrote, not another commenter.

This seems to be your preferred tactic when it is shown that your premise or defence is blatantly false. It is impossible to debate a person who creates a fake "quote" as you did in post #24 or when you show your inability to accept your own errors.
 
You replied to MY post, not to any other person's comments. Naturally I assumed your words were in regards to what I wrote, not another commenter.

This seems to be your preferred tactic when it is shown that your premise or defence is blatantly false. It is impossible to debate a person who creates a fake "quote" as you did in post #24 or when you show your inability to accept your own errors.

you seem to be on the defense with you engage me, why?

my comment was not negative on your posting but more of a question of how does it relate to the OP who is trying to create abridge to something he cannot, the op'er these days is been creating many postings which are sheer bizarre
 
well no it was not clear, the OP wants to bridge a trump connect to this person, and i have not seen it yet.

He is just one of the many deplorables that found a voice in Trump. Trump was just reaping what he sowed.
 
:lamo so anytime a democrat breaks the law and there is a democrat president we can make the connection to both...sweet!

Sorry but it is not as simple as that. The man worked for Trump in the campaign and his kind were his biggest supporters. But the worst thing is that Trump encouraged them with his rhetoric. He actually brought them out of the woodwork so they would vote for him. No candidate in my lifetime has done that except George Wallace.
 
Sorry but it is not as simple as that. The man worked for Trump in the campaign and his kind were his biggest supporters. But the worst thing is that Trump encouraged them with his rhetoric. He actually brought them out of the woodwork so they would vote for him. No candidate in my lifetime has done that except George Wallace.

that means nothing.
 
Back
Top Bottom