• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ann Coulter vows to speak at UC Berkeley after school calls off event

conservatives can be "left" or "right" depending on the current power structure. Stalinists were conservatives in some periods of Russian history but hardly "right wing". Union leadership in the USA was often "conservative" but hardly right wing either. modern "liberalism" in the USA is often reactionary and statist-every problem is met with a pavlovian demand for more government and more taxes.

and often the "right" is progressive as in the case of the founders and now the libertarian movement.

Complete double speak---the KKK started in the conservative south and Indiana .
 
The right wing are experts at revisionist history. MLK was a conservative, and so was Abraham Lincoln. The KKK was liberal. These are popular beliefs among right wing circles.

how do you define liberal? less freedom and more government is hardly liberal in my book. the modern left is all about more federal power
 
really? she was a top student in HS that earned her admission into a top drawer college-Cornell. At Cornell she earned honors grades and had a very high LSAT score. that got her admission into one of the most prestigious law schools in the USA-U of Michigan (getting into Michigan as a non resident is no easy feat-I know several people admitted to Harvard and two to Yale who did not get into Michigan). At Michigan she made order of the coif and the law review. I don't believe U of M had affirmative action in terms of grades or law review based on grades but she may have had a break getting into Michigan as a woman-that is something I cannot state one way or the other though I know other people with similar resumes from Cornell who got into Michigan and other similar law schools who were male.

Then she was a clerk for the Circuit court of appeals-a normal achievement for a law review editor from a top ten law school. and from that a Justice Dept. Honors Hire.

so that is a pretty good resume for a political commentator-way ahead of most of the others

Meh, who knows how many vastly more qualified Asians and white males lost their spots for an affirmative action baby like Coulter.
 
Complete double speak---the KKK started in the conservative south and Indiana .

conservative-yes-right wing NO. a racist statist environment is not right wing but those who try to preserve such an environment are "conservative"
 
how do you define liberal? less freedom and more government is hardly liberal in my book. the modern left is all about more federal power

Please, your political party loves big government, as does your new GOP president. Who are you trying to kid?
 
Meh, who knows how many vastly more qualified Asians and white males lost their spots for an affirmative action baby like Coulter.

really? what affirmative action did she get? being female? well her credentials in college were far higher than say Hillary clinton's who didn't even graduate cum laude at a school rated lower than cornell
 
Please, your political party loves big government, as does your new GOP president. Who are you trying to kid?

what is "your party"

I am a libertarian. I don't like big government
 
really? what affirmative action did she get? being female? well her credentials in college were far higher than say Hillary clinton's who didn't even graduate cum laude at a school rated lower than cornell

Then Hillary and Coulter are both affirmative action babies then.
 
conservative-yes-right wing NO. a racist statist environment is not right wing but those who try to preserve such an environment are "conservative"

Did you just drag right-wing into the discussion?

Right-wing is conservative only when it serves your political purpose ?
 
All tax payers have paid for that campus... all tax payers have a right to it's platforms

So does that mean I have a right to rent university facilities to host an Eyes Wide Shut Party? It is still private property, the administration still gets to decide who can use campus facilities. Does being a taxpayer give you the right to attend the university? No, same goes for use of the facilities.
 
really? what affirmative action did she get? being female? well her credentials in college were far higher than say Hillary clinton's who didn't even graduate cum laude at a school rated lower than cornell

Still having trouble with 2017 and the thread topic--coulter ?
 
You vote for the GOP. Obviously you do.

I do when I believe that the result will mean less federal government expansion than the Democrat candidate. over the last 40 years the DNC has been the party of more and more federal government
 
I do when I believe that the result will mean less federal government expansion than the Democrat candidate. over the last 40 years the DNC has been the party of more and more federal government

Yet, both of them grow the government substantially. At least the Democrats are honest about it. The GOP pretends to be limited government when they are campaigning...then do the complete opposite when in power.
 
Except you never vote for libertarians .

where do you come up with such nonsense? I ran the Clark campaign in 80 and voted for him in the presidential election. I voted for the Libertarian candidate in 1992 and IIRC 96. I voted for libertarians on state tickets many times. now in really close elections on a national level-president and Senator-I do usually vote GOP mainly for judges
 
Yet, both of them grow the government substantially. At least the Democrats are honest about it. The GOP pretends to be limited government when their campaigning...then do the complete opposite when in power.

sometimes that is true but you have admitted the the Democrats are for big government at the federal level. and if IIRC the GOP justices on the USSC have mainly voted against the expansion of federal power while the Dem appointees are generally in favor of it.
 
sometimes that is true but you have admitted the the Democrats are for big government at the federal level. and if IIRC the GOP justices on the USSC have mainly voted against the expansion of federal power while the Dem appointees are generally in favor of it.

It's always true. Face it, you guys have really never elected an actual conservative to the presidency.
 
It's always true. Face it, you guys have really never elected an actual conservative to the presidency.

less big government than those you democrats have run

later
 
"leftists" weren't the originators of the KKK. Why lie about it?

Sure they were. Leftists were no different then than now. The only difference is that by claiming they care about minority groups and 'championing' them, they have truly perfected the art of ****ing them over completely. The Klan were and remain pikers when it comes to screwing over minorities by comparison to the rat party.
 
Sure they were. Leftists were no different then than now. The only difference is that by claiming they care about minority groups and 'championing' them, they have truly perfected the art of ****ing them over completely. The Klan were and remain pikers when it comes to screwing over minorities by comparison to the rat party.

So you have nothing to back up your assertion. Gotcha
 
So does that mean I have a right to rent university facilities to host an Eyes Wide Shut Party? It is still private property, the administration still gets to decide who can use campus facilities. Does being a taxpayer give you the right to attend the university? No, same goes for use of the facilities.

Fortunately, the Supreme Court of the U.S. does not share your notions about government restriction of the freedom of speech. Apparently you do not understand that a decision like this by officials of a state university is state action, which means it must comply with the First Amendment. Apparently you do not understand, either, that the Court considers all First Amendment freedoms fundamental, so that its "strict scrutiny" standard applies in constitutional challenges to government actions which restrict those freedoms. You also do not seem to understand that courts disfavor prior restraints on speech more strongly than any other form of restriction of it. Ms. Coulter had not defamed anyone, used fighting words or obscenity, or engaged in speech that created a clear and present danger of imminent lawless action. She had not yet even given her speech, and the public safety reason the officials gave was nothing but a pretext for silencing a person whose views they dislike.
 
True--it was southern conservatives--no amount of historical revision can ever change that .

It was the Democratic Party that has always hated Blacks and loved slavery.
 
So you have nothing to back up your assertion. Gotcha
Other than every major democrat run city in the country, blacks leading the country in every misery index category, the devastation of black families...

nah....
 
Back
Top Bottom