• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Criminal Charges against Lois Lerner

AlbqOwl said:
There are none so blind as those who will not see. Please re-read the OP including the links and the links within the links.

So for the third time, I ask you, what evidence would you deem justifiable for a congressional hearing? What evidence would be necessary that would convince you such a hearing was not a witch hunt?
Click to expand...

evidence which does not appear to exist as it has not yet been presented
 
justabubba said:
certainly she did herself a favor by saying she did nothing wrong and then refused to incriminate herself
the reich wing was on a witch hunt and she was their designated witch. only she refused to say anything under oath knowing that it would be used to justify burning her at the stake. kind of like the old days when the witch thrown into water and then floated to the top was automatically decreed to be guilty and thus warranted burning
Click to expand...

I'm in favor of burning this witch at the legal stake.
 
justabubba said:
evidence which does not appear to exist as it has not yet been presented
Click to expand...

So you will not answer the question but will just keep dodging and weaving? The items listed that are absolute fact don't constitute the possibility, even probability of wrong doing? The fact that Lerner took the Fifth instead of addressing the questions head on and explaining what happened is not reason for at least some suspicion?

Of course if such evidence existed showing obvious or probable prejudice and even vindictiveness against left wing groups but not involving any right wing groups wouldn't have bothered you either. (Cough)

But let's humor you. How will such evidence be produced without investigation?
 
Last edited:
nota bene said:
I'm in favor of burning this witch at the legal stake.
Click to expand...

go for it

but only if you are able to prove that any violation of law transpired

bet you/they cannot do so

benghazi!
 
AlbqOwl said:
So you will not answer the question but will just keep dodging and weaving? The items listed that are absolute fact don't constitute the possibility, even probability of wrong doing? The fact that Lerner took the Fifth instead of addressing the questions head on and explaining what happened is not reason for at least some suspicion?

Of course if such evidence existed showing obvious or probable prejudice and even vindictiveness against left wing groups but not involving any right wing groups wouldn't have bothered you either. (Cough)

But let's humor you. How will such evidence be produced without investigation?
Click to expand...

how many years later has it been and you still cannot show us any evidence of wrongdoing

your side wasted a ton of time and money on benghazi, and will do the same with this

but will ignore tRump's series of conflicts of interests

so, enjoy your little witch hunt. in the meantime i will be looking for photos to mock your side with when all you come up with is another massive failure
 
justabubba said:
go for it

but only if you are able to prove that any violation of law transpired

bet you/they cannot do so

benghazi!
Click to expand...

Benghazi has nothing to do with the IRS. Have you read any of the links provided in Post 10?
 
nota bene said:
Benghazi has nothing to do with the IRS. Have you read any of the links provided in Post 10?
Click to expand...

benghazi relates only because it illustrates another example of the republican reich wing on another snipe hunt

your links provide no evidence of wrongdoing
 
tres borrachos said:
No, that's not what any of those links said. There is no "conclusion" and in fact, your links say the opposite. For instance:

Comey’s description of the situation, however, is at odds with Trump’s.

He said the Justice Department authorized him to publicly acknowledge the probe’s existence.

“I can promise you we will follow the facts wherever they lead,” Comey said.

The FBI director repeatedly declined to provide more details about the investigation, including which Trump officials are being targeted.

The inquiry, which he said began last July, will determine whether any crimes were committed.
Click to expand...

Correction: The Lie began last July. When the FBI and other intelligence agencies announced there was at least a 99% that Russia, China and several other countries had hacked every piece of information from Hillarys illegal computer server. The most damaging Intelligence leak in all US history and the only real crime committed.

In response to this announcement Trump made a joke about Russia making public all of Hillary Clinton's Illegally deleted emails.That is what gave Obama, Hillary and the DNC the idea for this propaganda lie.

After 8 months of investigation there is literally more evidence that Bigfoot exists that there is Trump colluded with Russia.
 
Casca XV said:
Correction: The Lie began last July. When the FBI and other intelligence agencies announced there was at least a 99% that Russia, China and several other countries had hacked every piece of information from Hillarys illegal computer server. The most damaging Intelligence leak in all US history and the only real crime committed.

In response to this announcement Trump made a joke about Russia making public all of Hillary Clinton's Illegally deleted emails.That is what gave Obama, Hillary and the DNC the idea for this propaganda lie.

After 8 months of investigation there is literally more evidence that Bigfoot exists that there is Trump colluded with Russia.
Click to expand...

The only correction that needs to be made is your correction of your own false claim that the investigation, which is still ongoing, has been concluded, and your false claims about what Comey and Clapper said. Neither one of them said what you claimed they did.
 
justabubba said:
how many years later has it been and you still cannot show us any evidence of wrongdoing

your side wasted a ton of time and money on benghazi, and will do the same with this

but will ignore tRump's series of conflicts of interests

so, enjoy your little witch hunt. in the meantime i will be looking for photos to mock your side with when all you come up with is another massive failure
Click to expand...

Noted that you cannot or will not answer my question, but continue to accuse "my side" of wrong doing. How can you do that when you don't have any clue as to what they need to have in order to conduct a valid hearing? Do you realize how clueless that looks to people who actually have read the history and facts?
 
AlbqOwl said:
Noted that you cannot or will not answer my question, but continue to accuse "my side" of wrong doing. How can you do that when you don't have any clue as to what they need to have in order to conduct a valid hearing? Do you realize how clueless that looks to people who actually have read the history and facts?
Click to expand...

i have seen nothing except a situation where civil servants were doing their best to perform their work in conformance with existing laws, rules, and regulations

and you have provided nothing which indicates anything else transpired
 
justabubba said:
you insisted "Comney and the FBI concluded there was no Collusion between Trump and Russia"
and then offered 4 cites which do NOT tell us that
my surmise is that you have been deceived by fake news
Click to expand...

(Conclusion) you are absolutely right I stand corrected. Let me rephrase: After 8 months of the most intense investigation in all US History by every branch of the US Intelligence Service Comney, Clapper and Merelle (who would have been chief of US intelligence had Hillary won) all admit there is 0% evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians or that Russian efforts influenced the election results.
 
justabubba said:
i have seen nothing except a situation where civil servants were doing their best to perform their work in conformance with existing laws, rules, and regulations

and you have provided nothing which indicates anything else transpired
Click to expand...

If that is all you have seen then you:

1. Have not read the history and circumstances behind the hearings.
2. Completely ignored the evidence provided in the OP.

But ignorance is bliss, isn't it.
 
tres borrachos said:
The only correction that needs to be made is your correction of your own false claim that the investigation, which is still ongoing, has been concluded, and your false claims about what Comey and Clapper said. Neither one of them said what you claimed they did.
Click to expand...

See 65.....It looks like a new propaganda ploy of Leftist is to parse words and ignore the actual meaning of the statement. But like with Trump it's not really working. Most understand that most people don't talk like a lawyer or professional politician. They instinctively know who is telling the truth and who is lying.
 
AlbqOwl said:
If that is all you have seen then you:

1. Have not read the history and circumstances behind the hearings.
2. Completely ignored the evidence provided in the OP.

But ignorance is bliss, isn't it.
Click to expand...

i will take your word for it
 
Casca XV said:
See 65.....It looks like a new propaganda ploy of Leftist is to parse words and ignore the actual meaning of the statement. But like with Trump it's not really working. Most understand that most people don't talk like a lawyer or professional politician. They instinctively know who is telling the truth and who is lying.
Click to expand...

Neat, but it doesn't have anything to do with your false claim. Neither Comey nor Clapper said what you posted that they said.

I've also seen no evidence of Trump collusion with the Russians (which isn't surprising given the investigation is still going on and I'm not part of them), so it probably never happened or else we would know something by now. That doesn't give any of us the right to attribute comments to public figures that they never made.
 
justabubba said:
benghazi relates only because it illustrates another example of the republican reich wing on another snipe hunt

your links provide no evidence of wrongdoing
Click to expand...

I guess the answer then is, "No, I couldn't be bothered to read Post 10, much less click on the links."

I wasn't the one who posted the links. :roll:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom