• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Is Actually The One Who Won The Low Population States

NIMBY said:
Don't expect any more than a 6-word drive-by from the OP that doesn't address a single point in your post.

In which so many of your points are what trump ran on .
Click to expand...

Not the subject of the thread.
 
Moderate Right said:
No one has refuted my OP without changing the parameters. So, it is your refusal to acknowledge the data and facts, not mine.
Click to expand...

The only parameter of this thread is voter turnout density, a concept you won't accept.

Thank you for telling Democrats where they need to focus their attentions, in going after small voter density states that trump overwhelmingly won .
 
Moderate Right said:
I don't see what difference that makes. Hillary won Maine. It is a blue state.
Click to expand...

Maine splits its electoral votes and trump won the CD that has a much smaller voter density--another continued fail on your part .
 
Moderate Right said:
Nope. Just pointing out that trump is our legitimate president, legitimately elected and that Hillary won small population areas as well.
Click to expand...

At zero time have I said trump isn't legitimate or wasn't legitimately elected. So another fail from you in changing the subject.

Glad to see you've amended your OP to say that HRC won small population areas as well.

Yet you just can't say that trump won the vast amount of small population areas, a concept that almost all trumposters have endlessly bragged about since the election, except you in this fail thread .
 
Yeah she won many small states. The argument around the electoral college that many Trumpites have suddenly found an affinity for is that small hamlets within certain states (like michigan), which vote with a hive-mind despite they've never met each other, should have far away more representation than cities in other states (like new york). Not that hamlets in states like california should have more representation than cities like atlanta. That's as twisted a 'democracy' as you'll ever find in world history, but that's what actually happened that they're suddenly defending
 
Moderate Right said:
Why is it the left's only arguments are cartoons?
Click to expand...


Buggs Bunny is a cartoon. He gives a spicy press briefing at the White House each day and it's a barrel of laffs.




Ma and Pa Kettle are an editorial drawing that is political-socio-cultural and well as socieconomic. The right doesn't do very well at all at argument but it excels at Faux reports generated for years now by the mass of well funded rightwhinge media. Think Stephen Bannon among a slew of others.

On second thought don't.

Nonetheless youse over there on the right need to see how CCP China state media and netizens report in the most serious terms the lies and bull**** dreamed up by the mass of right wing media in the USA and in the English language media elsewhere, the UK in particular.


How Western Fake News Took Over China’s Social Media

Chinese-language articles included the sensational claims that former President Barack Obama would refuse to leave the White House if Donald Trump won the election — an article originally published last September by a satirical news site — and that WikiLeaks documents showed Clinton was selling weaponry to the Islamic State — a piece that was published in October by the widely discredited right-wing site Political Insider.

The global flow of misinformation shows how clickbait and fake news goes viral in similar ways all over the world, yet it also reveals the unique characteristics of China’s digital media environment. These articles — read by millions of Chinese Internet users — are only the tip of an increasingly disconcerting iceberg.

How Western Fake News Took Over China?s Social Media | Sixth Tone
 
Tangmo said:
Buggs Bunny is a cartoon. He gives a spicy press briefing at the White House each day and it's a barrel of laffs.




Ma and Pa Kettle are an editorial drawing that is political-socio-cultural and well as socieconomic. The right doesn't do very well at all at argument but it excels at Faux reports generated for years now by the mass of well funded rightwhinge media. Think Stephen Bannon among a slew of others.

On second thought don't.

Nonetheless youse over there on the right need to see how CCP China state media and netizens report in the most serious terms the lies and bull**** dreamed up by the mass of right wing media in the USA and in the English language media elsewhere, the UK in particular.


How Western Fake News Took Over China’s Social Media

Chinese-language articles included the sensational claims that former President Barack Obama would refuse to leave the White House if Donald Trump won the election — an article originally published last September by a satirical news site — and that WikiLeaks documents showed Clinton was selling weaponry to the Islamic State — a piece that was published in October by the widely discredited right-wing site Political Insider.

The global flow of misinformation shows how clickbait and fake news goes viral in similar ways all over the world, yet it also reveals the unique characteristics of China’s digital media environment. These articles — read by millions of Chinese Internet users — are only the tip of an increasingly disconcerting iceberg.

How Western Fake News Took Over China?s Social Media | Sixth Tone
Click to expand...


What the hell does that nonsense have to do with anything? Communist nations use fake propaganda all the time, no matter who is president. They did it under Obama. They will do it under Trump.
 
Moderate Right said:
What the hell does that nonsense have to do with anything? Communist nations use fake propaganda all the time, no matter who is president. They did it under Obama. They will do it under Trump.
Click to expand...


The right wing had Trump publicly begging Wikileaks to save his campaign last year which they did. With Wikileaks, Putin, Snowden and Vlad's military cyber army perpetrating fake "news" who could ask for anything more.

I don't like or respect the Ma and Pa Kettles who made the difference in the election but the happy couple are more innocent idiots while Trump is a calculating one. And He's taking youse boyz for a ride.

The point is that fake propaganda comes from within and it impacted the election. Ma and Pa swung a lot of Electoral College votes this time around -- three and four ECVs at at go and some bigger numbers too. Federal and Congressional investigations have forsworn to answer every question. Things at this point remain open ended....
 
Tangmo said:
The right wing had Trump publicly begging Wikileaks to save his campaign last year which they did. With Wikileaks, Putin, Snowden and Vlad's military cyber army perpetrating fake "news" who could ask for anything more.

I don't like or respect the Ma and Pa Kettles who made the difference in the election but the happy couple are more innocent idiots while Trump is a calculating one. And He's taking youse boyz for a ride.

The point is that fake propaganda comes from within and it impacted the election. Ma and Pa swung a lot of Electoral College votes this time around -- three and four ECVs at at go and some bigger numbers too. Federal and Congressional investigations have forsworn to answer every question. Things at this point remain open ended....
Click to expand...

Carry on with your fantasy.
 
Moderate Right said:
Carry on with your fantasy.
Click to expand...


FBI is actively conducting an ever expanding counterintelligence investigation of the 2016 election. It is a counter espionage investigation. The two intelligence committees of the Congress are doing the same.

Wikileaks has targeted the United States from its founding by Assange. Putin quickly gave Assange a national television talk program based in Moscow. Wikileaks aided and abetted Snowden slipping out of Hong Kong to Moscow where he has his new digs. Wikileaks has ignored Moscow's intelligence operations civilian and military. Wikileaks says nothing about Chinese cyber espionage against the United States. Says nothing about Iran as the number one perp of state sponsored terrorism.

This is all too real.

Further, because the right can't make war against the entire Muslim world the right decided to make war against the institutions of the United States that block the rightwing in their extremist lunatic bents. To include our election process. Yes Putin is a strong leader -- another and accurate word is tyrant.
 
Tangmo said:
FBI is actively conducting an ever expanding counterintelligence investigation of the 2016 election. It is a counter espionage investigation. The two intelligence committees of the Congress are doing the same.

Wikileaks has targeted the United States from its founding by Assange. Putin quickly gave Assange a national television talk program based in Moscow. Wikileaks aided and abetted Snowden slipping out of Hong Kong to Moscow where he has his new digs. Wikileaks has ignored Moscow's intelligence operations civilian and military. Wikileaks says nothing about Chinese cyber espionage against the United States. Says nothing about Iran as the number one perp of state sponsored terrorism.

This is all too real.

Further, because the right can't make war against the entire Muslim world the right decided to make war against the institutions of the United States that block the rightwing in their extremist lunatic bents. To include our election process. Yes Putin is a strong leader -- another and accurate word is tyrant.
Click to expand...

The FBI investigates a lot of things. They're still investigating the Clinton Foundation.
 
Moderate Right said:
The FBI investigates a lot of things. They're still investigating the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...



As I'd said, it's all real.

I say to FBI go go go in all that it does.

Not that I trust Comey either.

MSM continues to have the First Amendment. Which means the right is screwed. Even Trump and Spicy have retreated from their virulent attacks on MSM.

Trump has also had to back off from trying to degrade the judiciary as having his "so-called" judges.

So we see what happens when the right led by the altright seizes power. They go OTT and start getting bombs incoming. Get tangled up in what the Constitution has put between them and us as needed and necessary barbed wire.

Back to the trenches boyz.
 
Tangmo said:
As I'd said, it's all real.

I say to FBI go go go in all that it does.

Not that I trust Comey either.

MSM continues to have the First Amendment. Which means the right is screwed. Even Trump and Spicy have retreated from their virulent attacks on MSM.

Trump has also had to back off from trying to degrade the judiciary as having his "so-called" judges.

So we see what happens when the right led by the altright seizes power. They go OTT and start getting bombs incoming. Get tangled up in what the Constitution has put between them and us as needed and necessary barbed wire.

Back to the trenches boyz.
Click to expand...

Well, finally an admission that the MSM uses it's first amendment rights to screw the right. In other words, they are very biased. But, they have been doing this for decades and the American public isn't buying it anymore because they voted for Trump despite all of the biased negativity directed toward the right by the MSM. In fact, voters are now apt to do just the opposite of what the MSM is trying to influence the voters on.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, finally an admission that the MSM uses it's first amendment rights to screw the right. In other words, they are very biased. But, they have been doing this for decades and the American public isn't buying it anymore because they voted for Trump despite all of the biased negativity directed toward the right by the MSM. In fact, voters are now apt to do just the opposite of what the MSM is trying to influence the voters on.
Click to expand...


Anyone who does't approve of or accept the First Amendment -- or the Constitution itself -- should set about to change it.

If they haven't done that already that is.

Trump now and the right have been assailing MSM for decades, going back to Spiro "brown paper bagman" Agnew and Richard Nixon well before the Spiro was put to it by Potus Nixon to do his bidding. It all and more turned out to be their demise. The consensus of history is a strong positive about it.

As I'd noted, Trump has retreated from his blatant assault on the First Amendment and the judiciary also. His Dancing Fanboyz might do well to take Trump's lead. Because while Trump is still singing off tune he's dogging out a different howler of a tune.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom