• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary Is Actually The One Who Won The Low Population States

I'd love having the Democrat nominee next time around be

1) a decorated war hero

2) a guy who wants to massively cut the tax rate

3) an NRA member who bought firearms through the DCM

4) a man who thought the USA needed a "special force" and created the Green Berets

None of those points have anything to do with this thread you are failing to derail.

Nor do any of those points apply to the current childish chickenhawk liar who sees his favorables go up by playing war games with "my military" while stupidly tweeting to a madman.

Your ultimate goal here will be to smear Hillary and Obama, as trumputin does daily
 
I'd love having the Democrat nominee next time around be

1) a decorated war hero

2) a guy who wants to massively cut the tax rate

3) an NRA member who bought firearms through the DCM

4) a man who thought the USA needed a "special force" and created the Green Berets

JFK is one of ours, not yours. You get to keep RMN and djt. Neither Bush wants anything to do with this despicable PoS. RWR and DDE are rolling over in their graves .
 
Are Trump supporters still trying to relive November 9? Jesus, guys, I know Trump sucks, but get over it. Reliving Clinton's loss isn't going to make him suck any less.

They're just following their dear leader's behaviors.

The next time trump has a bad week or two, watch out for "his military" .
 
It was a disengenuous thread trying to manipulate data to have low population states cut off at 4 EVs and you know it TurtleDude.

Moderate Right hasn't been able to counter any of my posts, ON TOPIC, including not knowing that ME split its EVs.

You're just in here protecting what you think is one of yours and going after a few favorite targets of yours while derailing the thread .

That isn't the issue. the issue is about posters who try to derail a thread by asking for proof of stuff that is in the common domain of knowledge
 
JFK is one of ours, not yours. You get to keep RMN and djt. Neither Bush wants anything to do with this despicable PoS. RWR and DDE are rolling over in their graves .

Modern day democrats -for the most part-are tax hiking, gun banning types who see the government as a way to get money from others
 
That isn't the issue. the issue is about posters who try to derail a thread by asking for proof of stuff that is in the common domain of knowledge

Any objective poster will see that it was you who derailed this thread, going after moot and I, trying to protect Moderate Right.

You've obviously wandered into the wrong forum and also know that you can't counter any of my posts ON THE THREAD TOPIC, which is why you haven't .
 
Modern day democrats -for the most part-are tax hiking, gun banning types who see the government as a way to get money from others

Your accusations at me for being a Democrat are in full view of the board, TurtleDude.

Anything on the THREAD TOPIC, or just more derail that you expect to get away with .
 
Your accusations at me for being a Democrat are in full view of the board, TurtleDude.

Anything on the THREAD TOPIC, or just more derail that you expect to get away with .

I said nothing about you NIMBY. I noted that most democrats are tax hiking, gun banning types. I have never claimed you are a gun banner.
 
Any objective poster will see that it was you who derailed this thread, going after moot and I, trying to protect Moderate Right.

You've obviously wandered into the wrong forum and also know that you can't counter any of my posts ON THE THREAD TOPIC, which is why you haven't .

Moot tried to derail the thread by demanding the OP supply links to stuff that is obvious to everyone.
 
Moot tried to derail the thread by demanding the OP supply links to stuff that is obvious to everyone.

How many times do those of your ilk ask for links and you think it's just fine?

Btw, the next time you discuss the THREAD TOPIC in this thread will be the first .
 
I said nothing about you NIMBY. I noted that most democrats are tax hiking, gun banning types. I have never claimed you are a gun banner.

Enough of your thinly veiled personal insults by cowardly hiding behind the word MOST while repeating your blatant irrational lies at me.

Feel free to speak on the THREAD TOPIC, or do you feel safe not having to do that ?
 
How many times do those of your ilk ask for links and you think it's just fine?

Btw, the next time you discuss the THREAD TOPIC in this thread will be the first .


the thread states the obvious. the OP was stating the obvious.

nothing more nothing less
 
the thread states the obvious. the OP was stating the obvious.

nothing more nothing less

The thread was proven clearly wrong, as you well know, since trump won states with less than 12 EVs by 71 EVs of his total 74 EV winning total.

It's completely dishonest to state that Hillary won the smaller states, as you know.

Why do you think the OP thinks states like OK, NE, UT, IA, AR, KS and MS are heavily populated ?
 
The thread was proven clearly wrong, as you well know, since trump won states with less than 12 EVs by 71 EVs of his total 74 EV winning total.

It's completely dishonest to state that Hillary won the smaller states, as you know.

Why do you think the OP thinks states like OK, NE, UT, IA, AR, KS and MS are heavily populated ?

I couldn't care less. I know the following

Hillary lost. Trump won. Hillary's huge landslide in California meant Hillary had more of the popular vote than Trump. Trump won far more counties, and states. Trump is president, Hillary is hopefully finished as a politician
 
But you didn't read the post. It says "Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC)"

...but who cares?

Of course DC went to Hillary. What statistic does this factoid support?
 
I couldn't care less. I know the following

Hillary lost. Trump won. Hillary's huge landslide in California meant Hillary had more of the popular vote than Trump. Trump won far more counties, and states. Trump is president, Hillary is hopefully finished as a politician

Yet it was one of your ilk that started this thread that you couldn't care less about but have posted so much in.

And you continue with your moronic nonsense on CA as if it shouldn't count.

How about if I get to throw away 53 of trump's best CDs and play your ongoing stupid game.

It's your RED team that continues to unearth the corpse of Hillary when their childish chickenhawk liar needs a diversion .
 
Yet it was one of your ilk that started this thread that you couldn't care less about but have posted so much in.

And you continue with your moronic nonsense on CA as if it shouldn't count.

How about if I get to throw away 53 of trump's best CDs and play your ongoing stupid game.

It's your RED team that continues to unearth the corpse of Hillary when their childish chickenhawk liar needs a diversion .

cool story NIMBY. I'm calling it a night. Catch you later
 
The thread was proven clearly wrong, as you well know, since trump won states with less than 12 EVs by 71 EVs of his total 74 EV winning total.

It's completely dishonest to state that Hillary won the smaller states, as you know.

Why do you think the OP thinks states like OK, NE, UT, IA, AR, KS and MS are heavily populated ?



Indeed and quite. Yes.

Here are the Trump voters in those states...the voters who made the difference in the election...


images

Ma and Pa Kettle show their Official Approved Voter ID Card issued by their less than 10 Electoral College Vote state, November 9, 2016. Ma said she knows Trump won fair and square cause she saw it on Fox. Pa said since he couldn't vote for Putin voting for Trump wuz the next best thing.


So we see anyway the sore winners are still at it.
 
I said nothing about you NIMBY. I noted that most democrats are tax hiking, gun banning types. I have never claimed you are a gun banner.

That is a ridiculous stereotype. I guess MOST Libertarians are "closet" ............................ Get my point?
 
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations

With the exception of D.C. and Hawaii, all the states won by Hillary were in the liberal or Democratic bastion of the Northeast. Hawaii and D.C. has always been Democratic strongholds. No surprise there. The same with the states Trump won, plain or Rocky Mountain states, Republican strongholds as has been Alaska. One would expect the results to be exactly what they were. Although New Hampshire has been the lone Republican holdout in the northeast for quite a while, but has been trending Democratic for at least the last 20 years.

The United States is a very divided nation politically as it was during the Civil War. But not north and south, it is divided with the northeast and west coast on one side and fly over country or middle America on the other. That is with the exception of a few island states in the old midwest like Minnesota and Illinois. We went from an era around 50 years ago when almost every state was in play to around a handful are in play today, we call them swing states. Around 8 and no more than 10, the rest are already decided regardless of whom the nominees are.

I think this has more to do with the movement of the two parties to the right and left, call that hard right and left. Back 40 to 50 years ago there wasn't that much difference in the two parties. There is now. Back then each party had their conservative and liberal wings, not anymore.
 
Did a study and found that out of the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes:

Hillary won (7)

Delaware
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

Trump won (6)

Alaska
Idaho
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming


So, it is a liberal myth that it was Trump who won the states with the least populations

Trump won in a massive (I mean Yuge) landslide based on territory covered. :2razz:
 
i hope that the Democrats are working 24/7 to find someone who can lead the party and win rather than just passing the crown to the next unappealing legacy candidate. it's depressing that we are ready to ride this gerrymandered two party system down to the ocean floor, but someone at least needs to grab a bucket.
 
Thank you for pointing out that trump won the electoral college 154-83 with states having 11 or less electoral votes, or 71 of the 74 he won by .

How did I point that out? You guys were talking about the lowest population states and I pointed out that the states (and DC) with just 3 or 4 electoral votes actually went for Hillary, not Trump. She is the one who won the lowest of the lowest population states. You changed the subject to fit your biased partisan narrative.
 
...but who cares?

Of course DC went to Hillary. What statistic does this factoid support?

The left continues to try claiming that Trump won the lowest population states and I proved that it was actually Hillary who won these areas. Even if you take DC out, it was a 6 - 6 tie. But, DC has 3 electoral votes, just as a state has electoral votes.
 
Back
Top Bottom