Brischera
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2015
- Messages
- 1,442
- Reaction score
- 237
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
On November 15th, 2016 Megyn Kelly introduced a guest as:
“The man behind the digital operation now credited with helping find and turn out the voters who made the difference.”
Brad Parscale told her Trump’s victory came from his data mining expertise on utilizing the information to give Trump the edge. He is the co-owner of a small marketing firm in San Antonio, Texas with a 2015 total revenue of $3.5 million dollars. He was announced in June 2016 as Trump’s campaign digital director and he was not a cheap date because for the month of July alone the Trump campaign paid him $8.3 million dollars. For the next month of August Trump paid him $11 million dollars, as stated in FEC filings. Did Trump recruit him and pay those huge sums based on Mr. Parscale’s proven record of running political campaigns? Was Mr. Parscale in such high demand the earliest he could work for Mr. Trump was June 2016 after the Primaries ended? No. and Hell no. Mr. Parscale had never worked on or directed any political campaign for any candidate in any election in any State in the US or any nation in the world. He has no interest in politics by his own proclamation. His entire purpose for that interview was explaining how Trump won, but he never said anything about Cambridge Analytica and claimed only his firm, and nothing and nobody else was responsible for the upset. His only previous contact with Trump was to do some small scale web design, and all of it for Trump’s businesses, never for any election.
Santa Fe mayor defies Trump on sanctuary cities; Trump's digital guru details winning campaign operation | Fox News
REPORT FOR DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.
Mr. Parscale has also stated he never heard of the Mercer family and his first contact with Cambridge Analytica happened after they cold called him. Do billionaires throw darts on phonebooks for deciding who to call or are they meticulous and down to business? Cambridge Analytica first worked for the Cruz campaign when the Mercer family dropped $13,000,000 into a pro Cruz PAC, “Keep the Promise 1”, but switched to Trump, now known as “Make America Number 1”. CA and Cruz worked closely for over a year but after Cruz lost the Primary, CA hustled the Trump campaign to bring them on and Trump agreed. It is doubtful he is aware CA’s contributions to Cruz were so ineffective the campaign stopped using all CA data after the South Carolina primary.
The Mercers backed Cruz by investing over a year of energy for his campaign, at least one whopper check of $13,000,000 and giving and him exclusive access to Cambridge Analytica during the Primaries. They worked against Trump throughout the entire Primary campaign until Cruz lost. That is where the Russian story begins. After Cruz conceded to Trump on May 3rd, the following timeline of events are comical, sobering, spinning, frustrating, and boosted liquor and weed sales by 897%.
May 18, 2016: Clapper states signs of attempted hacking on 2016 elections have been noticed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...1745c0-1d0d-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html
“The man behind the digital operation now credited with helping find and turn out the voters who made the difference.”
Brad Parscale told her Trump’s victory came from his data mining expertise on utilizing the information to give Trump the edge. He is the co-owner of a small marketing firm in San Antonio, Texas with a 2015 total revenue of $3.5 million dollars. He was announced in June 2016 as Trump’s campaign digital director and he was not a cheap date because for the month of July alone the Trump campaign paid him $8.3 million dollars. For the next month of August Trump paid him $11 million dollars, as stated in FEC filings. Did Trump recruit him and pay those huge sums based on Mr. Parscale’s proven record of running political campaigns? Was Mr. Parscale in such high demand the earliest he could work for Mr. Trump was June 2016 after the Primaries ended? No. and Hell no. Mr. Parscale had never worked on or directed any political campaign for any candidate in any election in any State in the US or any nation in the world. He has no interest in politics by his own proclamation. His entire purpose for that interview was explaining how Trump won, but he never said anything about Cambridge Analytica and claimed only his firm, and nothing and nobody else was responsible for the upset. His only previous contact with Trump was to do some small scale web design, and all of it for Trump’s businesses, never for any election.
Santa Fe mayor defies Trump on sanctuary cities; Trump's digital guru details winning campaign operation | Fox News
REPORT FOR DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.
Mr. Parscale has also stated he never heard of the Mercer family and his first contact with Cambridge Analytica happened after they cold called him. Do billionaires throw darts on phonebooks for deciding who to call or are they meticulous and down to business? Cambridge Analytica first worked for the Cruz campaign when the Mercer family dropped $13,000,000 into a pro Cruz PAC, “Keep the Promise 1”, but switched to Trump, now known as “Make America Number 1”. CA and Cruz worked closely for over a year but after Cruz lost the Primary, CA hustled the Trump campaign to bring them on and Trump agreed. It is doubtful he is aware CA’s contributions to Cruz were so ineffective the campaign stopped using all CA data after the South Carolina primary.
The Mercers backed Cruz by investing over a year of energy for his campaign, at least one whopper check of $13,000,000 and giving and him exclusive access to Cambridge Analytica during the Primaries. They worked against Trump throughout the entire Primary campaign until Cruz lost. That is where the Russian story begins. After Cruz conceded to Trump on May 3rd, the following timeline of events are comical, sobering, spinning, frustrating, and boosted liquor and weed sales by 897%.
May 18, 2016: Clapper states signs of attempted hacking on 2016 elections have been noticed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...1745c0-1d0d-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html