• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mission Accomplished - Bathroom Bill Is Repealed

Cigar

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 20, 2012
Messages
5,368
Reaction score
2,117
Location
In The Crosshairs
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
The N.C.A.A. on Tuesday lifted its ban — “reluctantly” — on holding championship events in North Carolina, removing its six-month-old prohibition less than a week after the state’s legislature repealed a so-called bathroom bill that had led to boycotts of the state.

In a statement, the organization that governs college athletics said the law’s replacement in North Carolina had “minimally achieved a situation where we believe N.C.A.A. championships may be conducted in a nondiscriminatory environment.”

The earlier law, known as House Bill 2, or HB2, had removed anti-discrimination protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, and it required transgender people to use bathrooms in public facilities that aligned with their sexes assigned at birth. While the replacement bill bars local governments from passing their own ordinances on the topic, it left regulation of bathrooms up to the state legislature.

While advocates on both sides of the debate have tended to characterize the compromise as insufficient, the state’s business community, which opposed HB2 on pragmatic grounds, is most likely to see the N.C.A.A.’s decision as a high-profile vindication.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/sports/ncaa-hb2-north-carolina-boycott-bathroom-bill.html

Screen Shot 2016-04-28 at 3.49.19 PM.jpg
 
The N.C.A.A. on Tuesday lifted its ban — “reluctantly” — on holding championship events in North Carolina, removing its six-month-old prohibition less than a week after the state’s legislature repealed a so-called bathroom bill that had led to boycotts of the state.

In a statement, the organization that governs college athletics said the law’s replacement in North Carolina had “minimally achieved a situation where we believe N.C.A.A. championships may be conducted in a nondiscriminatory environment.”

The earlier law, known as House Bill 2, or HB2, had removed anti-discrimination protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, and it required transgender people to use bathrooms in public facilities that aligned with their sexes assigned at birth. While the replacement bill bars local governments from passing their own ordinances on the topic, it left regulation of bathrooms up to the state legislature.

While advocates on both sides of the debate have tended to characterize the compromise as insufficient, the state’s business community, which opposed HB2 on pragmatic grounds, is most likely to see the N.C.A.A.’s decision as a high-profile vindication.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/sports/ncaa-hb2-north-carolina-boycott-bathroom-bill.html

View attachment 67215941
congrats on unillegalizin old men gettin to pee with little girls
 
Nothing like progressives forcing things on everyone else. Sigh.
 
Congrats on completely mischaracterizing the issue in an attempt to promote your agenda.

Because this doesn't allow anyone to use whatever bathroom they want?
 
Nothing like progressives forcing things on everyone else. Sigh.

In this case it was law forcing things upon everyone else. I thought a libertarian would be against forcing people to do certain things.
 
Because this doesn't allow anyone to use whatever bathroom they want?

Before this bill, wasn't the bathroom just fine? Have you ever had a problem?
 
Because this doesn't allow anyone to use whatever bathroom they want?

No because his post implied that the motivation for the legislation was to allow perv old men to pee with little girls. That is a completely dishonest mischaracterization of the issue.
 
The new law also prevents cities from passing polices like Charlotte did that originally sparked the controversy.

So you can't force people to use the bathroom of the gender on their BC nor can you pass a law allowing people to use restroom the identify with. That expires in 2020 I think
 
But, property owners retain the right to set whatever ****house rules they please. This is how it's supposed to work. Get the government the **** out of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom