• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion

V

volsrock

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
3,995
Reaction score
1,261
Location
Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
 
benghazi.jpg
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...

Yawn. The dems don't have to. It's the FBI and joint intelligence committees that are. And, yes, large amounts of circumstantial evidence exist; that's why there are investigations in the first place.

You really should pay better attention.
 
There do seem to be a lot of people here who identify themselves as being on the right but who don't seem to understand that the reason we don't have all the facts is that the facts are still being investigated. If there's nothing, good. But the fact that we don't know that there is something doesn't mean that there is nothing. It has to actually be invesetigated. That's why....


....wait for it....





.... it is being investigated.





How many bait threads are they going to start before they realize this?
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...


I don't believe in the loony leftist conspiracy theory of Russian interference and Trump/Russian collusion.But Breitbat is probably about the worst source you can use next to the national enquirer. Its the right wing version of media matters, mother jones or some other loony leftist media source.
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...

Schiff would have to be an idiot to say "yes there is definitive evidence of collusion" because that would put the investigation into a massive bind as information is demanded. You wouldn't say something like that until the intelligence services were ready to take action. That is why he said "it is extremely premature at this point".
 
jamesrage said:
I don't believe in the loony leftist conspiracy theory of Russian interference and Trump/Russian collusion.But Breitbat is probably about the worst source you can use next to the national enquirer. Its the right wing version of media matters, mother jones or some other loony leftist media source.
Click to expand...

Yeah the loony leftist conspiracy theory that was "invented" by our intelligence services. I guess the FBI, NSA, CIA are all a bunch of loony leftists huh?
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...

It's because he's white. If he was a Black president they'd have found 10 things already.
 
Verax said:
Yeah the loony leftist conspiracy theory that was "invented" by our intelligence services. I guess the FBI, NSA, CIA are all a bunch of loony leftists huh?
Click to expand...

What actual proof of this have they presented? Because they said so is not proof.
 
Just a reminder...
On Oct 7th US intelligence said Russia hacked voter registration databases.
On Oct 15th - FBI got a FISA warrant on SVB and Alfa Bank.
 
jamesrage said:
What actual proof of this have they presented? Because they said so is not proof.
Click to expand...

When one investigates, one looks for the proof.

You're thinking of prosecuting. That's where you present proof.
 
jamesrage said:
What actual proof of this have they presented? Because they said so is not proof.
Click to expand...

You do realize the investigation is ongoing and they don't usually release information to placate political nonsense.

Are you suggesting they're all lying and they made it up?
 
Verax said:
You do realize the investigation is ongoing and they don't usually release information to placate political nonsense.

Are you suggesting they're all lying and they made it up?
Click to expand...

The rules seem pretty clear.




They're investigating Clinton ---> JAIL HER!

They're investigating team trump ----> Fake news! JAIL THE MEDIA!
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart

Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...

That's incorrect. You can say that the House Intelligence panel hasn't discovered anything definitive. After Nunes' clown act I wouldn't be surprised if the House Intelligence Committee are among the very last people on earth to know anything.

Oh, and quoting Breitbart is tantamount to farting in church.
 
Lutherf said:
It's because he's white. If he was a Black president they'd have found 10 things already.
Click to expand...

Playing the race card for a white guy?

Claiming that a <1yr investigation without publicized proof of guilt is proof of innocence?

This reeks of desperation. I've never seen something like it before.
 
Verax said:
Yeah the loony leftist conspiracy theory that was "invented" by our intelligence services. I guess the FBI, NSA, CIA are all a bunch of loony leftists huh?
Click to expand...

Something something deep state blah blah the media and the democrats are our enemies but Putin is our friend ramble ramble. /s
 
volsrock said:
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said it is “way premature” to conclude that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

Dem Rep Schiff: Nothing Definitive on Trump-Russia Collusion - Breitbart


Nothing “definitive”, eh? So, it’s pure speculation.

At this point, we can say definitively that dems have not produced a single shred of evidence indicating any type of collusion of any kind at any time between anyone connected to Trump and anyone having any kind of ties to Russia.

They will keep digging for the next 4 years. That key piece of evidence will always be “right around the corner”.
Click to expand...

I see this as a major walkback from what he said a week and a half ago:

"Schiff: ‘More Than Circumstantial Evidence’ Trump Associates Colluded With Russia"

Schiff: '''More Than Circumstantial Evidence''' Trump Associates Colluded With Russia - NBC News


So what changed? The only thing I know of is that Schiff took Trump up on his offer to show the information that Nunes got.
 
Mr Person said:
When one investigates, one looks for the proof.

You're thinking of prosecuting. That's where you present proof.
Click to expand...

So in otherwords you have no proof.
 
Mr Person said:
So in other words, your posts express a contempt for words.
Click to expand...
I heard your bull **** excuse before. It means Trump's accusers have no evidence.
 
jamesrage said:
I heard your bull **** excuse before. It means Trump's accusers have no evidence.
Click to expand...

Reread this until you understand that investigations are what looks for evidence and that there are not Trump accusers claiming to have evidence yet.

Mr Person said:
When one investigates, one looks for the proof.

You're thinking of prosecuting. That's where you present proof.
Click to expand...



I'm sure you have a perfectly good excuse for 7 Benghazi investigations of Hillary despite no "evidence" preceding any of them, and despite the fact that the only thing the GOP and you tried to make political hay out of was the fact discovered, at the very end, that she used a private email server had NOTHING TO DO WITH BENGHAZI.

Do you, Mr. "show me the proof"?

/snort




Actually, don't respond. If you respond, you'll probably end up talking about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky or something equally irrelevant.
 
You sound like one of the Russian Trolls hired by Putin. Of course you believe Trump and not our intelligence agencies. He would never lie, I mean never. Of course he and his people have said it isn't a lie if you truely believe in what you are saying. And of course you have never heard of how info is gotten in the lntelligence field. If they let the public know what info they have, the Russians would know how we got it. We have seen what hapens to people who cross your friend Putin. That probably would not bother you as you are such good friends with Putin.
 
Mr Person said:
Reread this until you understand that investigations are what looks for evidence and that there are not Trump accusers claiming to have evidence yet.





I'm sure you have a perfectly good excuse for 7 Benghazi investigations of Hillary despite no "evidence" preceding any of them, and despite the fact that the only thing the GOP and you tried to make political hay out of was the fact discovered, at the very end, that she used a private email server had NOTHING TO DO WITH BENGHAZI.

Do you, Mr. "show me the proof"?

/snort




Actually, don't respond. If you respond, you'll probably end up talking about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky or something equally irrelevant.
Click to expand...

I did read it.It means that you and Trump's other accusers can not produce any evidence to support your claim other than because the intelligence agencies said so. Because they said so is not proof. Intelligence agencies have lied their ass off to the American people numerous times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom