• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump defends wild claims: 'I'm president, and you're not' (neener, neener!)

I'm pretty sure our nation became an embarrassment when we went into Iraq for no reason.

Or were we an embarrassment because Bill Clinton's escapades?

What was I thinking, were were an embarrassment when Reagan got caught up in that Iran-Contra affair.

Was it when Obama repeatedly made naive and somewhat childish comments about how the world work?

Sorry, I'm having trouble keeping track of when every time our nation became an embarrassment.

When the US left iraq and allowed militant islam to flourish. Or was that not a mistake but a planned maneuver to destabilize the region?

Hard to say.
 
Check this out. Based on the factchecking of the interview, Jezebel posted the revised interview with the falsehoods blacked out. Here's one example:

View attachment 67215582

The entire interview looks like that. Again, keep in mind that the entire point of the interview is Trump's credibility issues.

https://theslot.jezebel.com/we-redacted-everything-thats-not-a-verifiably-true-stat-1793571837

Thanks, that look interesting. I'll have to check it out.

Nobody who isn't a braindead Trumpbot thinks Trump is credible.
 
Wow... what revisionist history. Your side, en masse', NEVER EVER gave that honor to Bush.

What exactly is "my side?" You mean geo-mutualists? Yeah, we are quite the force to be reckoned with. :lol:

I liked Bush as a person. I hated his politics and the people he surrounded himself with. And although he was a terrible speaker (many presidents were, tbh) and he had his goofball moments, he at least carried himself in a presidential manner most of the time. I have never said otherwise.


I would go so far as to say you didn't give that to Reagan, a proven great president, while in office.

While he had one of the most scandalous administrations in history, Reagan also acted presidential. He did not go on public tirades about how a sketch comedy show treated him "unfairly."
 
What exactly is "my side?" You mean geo-mutualists? Yeah, we are quite the force to be reckoned with. :lol:

I liked Bush as a person. I hated his politics and the people he surrounded himself with. And although he was a terrible speaker (many presidents were, tbh) and he had his goofball moments, he at least carried himself in a presidential manner most of the time. I have never said otherwise.




While he had one of the most scandalous administrations in history, Reagan also acted presidential. He did not go on public tirades about how a sketch comedy show treated him "unfairly."
I would classify you on the side against the current administration and among those that hold right leaning politicians to a much stricter standard than you hold most others.

As regards a "presidential manner", it is quite subjective and pretty much an individual, especially voter by voter, perspective. If you looked closely I am pretty sure many of us would consider Teddy Roosevelt and his cousin, FDR, often very un-presidential while at other times VERY presidential, Woody Wilson [ racist comments, "Birth of a Nation" private WH screening, anti democratic/free speech sentiments... ], JFK in his nearly insatiable lust creating potential international and domestic blackmail opportunities, same with LBJ plus add his general biting, nasty, potty mouthed laced with expletives manner of expression, Nixon well, just for being Nixon, the ever clumsy, as portrayed in the press, Ford, Jimmy Carter with his peanut farmer thrift and his Billy beer guzzling brother, Bill Clinton and his infamous "exploits", as well as the bomb, the former administration taking sides against conservative groups, FOX, people who cling to their bibles and guns, jumping into local disputes [ Prof Gates, Trayvon Martin, Smith of Ferguson, etc ] where he had no prior knowledge and certainly no business then came down on the wrong side along racial lines...

There is no specific meaning to what is presidential and what is not. You are welcomed to your opinion, certainly. I believe a President, who is being hit from almost all sides by an establishment seeking first and foremost its own survival with the aid of its vast network of deep staters and media minions to assist them, has a right to punch back, hard, in almost any manner he sees fit in order to make American Great Again.
 
I can't speak for the illogical way your mind works - only you and your psychiatrist can puzzle out that poser for you. I wish you good luck in that endeavor.

No intelligent response eh? Typical conservative mindless rhetoric of insulting that of which you don't understand. Color me surprised...........LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom