• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

No SCOTUS Pick for a President Under Investigation

NIMBY said:
We didn't see the Constitution and the obstructionist GOP used in the same sentence in a coherent and professional way the last 8 years, especially the last 2.

What we did see was McConnell wiping his ass with the Constitution over his Garland fiasco, breaking the Senate .
Click to expand...

Lets not get carried away

Mcconnell did nothing unconstitutional
 
iguanaman said:
I am not looking for a "liberal President" only one that is loyal to U.S. of America. Is that too much to ask?
Click to expand...

You call yourself a liberal. Don't try to convince me that you're ok with a Republican president who is "loyal to U.S. of America". By the way, you have absolutely zero proof that Trump isn't "loyal to U.S. of America".
 
Moderate Right said:
You call yourself a liberal. Don't try to convince me that you're ok with a Republican president who is "loyal to U.S. of America". By the way, you have absolutely zero proof that Trump isn't "loyal to U.S. of America".
Click to expand...

There's plenty of circumstantial evidence of Trumps treason in his behavior as President but it will be up to the FBI to connect the dots.
 
iguanaman said:
There's plenty of circumstantial evidence of Trumps treason in his behavior as President but it will be up to the FBI to connect the dots.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence circumstantial or otherwise that trump committed treason
 
iguanaman said:
I am not looking for a "liberal President" only one that is loyal to U.S. of America. Is that too much to ask?
Click to expand...

Who are you kidding ?

Of course you want a liberal president

And the only reason you hate trump is because he's not a liberal
 
iguanaman said:
There's plenty of circumstantial evidence of Trumps treason in his behavior as President but it will be up to the FBI to connect the dots.
Click to expand...


Many times circumstantial evidence is no evidence at all. Liberals connect the dots any way they want to. Did it ever occur to you that there are no dots to connect?
 
Mac77 said:
Who are you kidding ?

Of course you want a liberal president

And the only reason you hate trump is because he's not a liberal
Click to expand...

I'm afraid you elected a criminal so his politics are a moot point now. I dislike Trump for many reasons but collusion with an enemy like Russia and a man like Putin is beyond comparison. I grew up during the cold war and to throw away our "victory" over Russia is not only horrifying it is dangerous as hell. What the F have you done?

Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Wednesday that there is “more than circumstantial evidence now” to suggest that President Donald Trump’s campaign may have colluded with Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election, but he would not offer details.

“I can tell you that the case is more than that,” Schiff told Chuck Todd on MSNBC. “And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”
Click to expand...

Schiff: There is now 'more than circumstantial evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion - POLITICO
 
humbolt said:
They're desperate to recapture political power by whatever means they can. It's a great example of placing political power above the interests of the nation. Just push the main leftist proponents of this stuff a little here, and they begin waving the patriotic flag. If it wasn't so transparently fake, it wouldn't be so amusing to watch.
Click to expand...

So true .
 
iguanaman said:
It is illegal to export US Uranium no matter who owns the company. None of our Uranium has been sold to Russia. Not that they need it since they are the world's largest producer of uranium. What has been sold to Russia is the leadership of the U.S. Trump even let Putin pick the Secretary of State for him. Putin's pick is now dismantling the State Dept. and going to Russia instead of the NATO summit.

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/20/tillerson-plans-to-skip-nato-meeting-visit-russia-in-april-sources.html


rex-tillerson-vladimir-putin-afp_650x400_81481687713.jpg
Click to expand...

Hillary sold uranium to the RUSSIANS and you know it , so stop posting lies . :roll:
 
Socrates1 said:
Hillary sold uranium to the RUSSIANS and you know it , so stop posting lies . :roll:
Click to expand...

Repeatng another of Trump's lies? Nobody sold uranium to the Russians. They have all they need and US uranium may not be exported by law. Hillary was among 9 other officials who signed off on the purchase of a uranium mine by the Russians but any uranium they produce stays here. Russia is the worlds largest producer of uranium from their mine in Kazakhstan.

Trump wrongly said that Hillary Clinton “gave” Russia 20 percent of the uranium in the United States. Clinton was one of nine votes approving the deal. She alone couldn’t have stopped the deal, which involved 20 percent of U.S. production capacity, not stocks, and the uranium can’t go to Russia without export licenses.
Click to expand...

FactChecking Trump’s News Conference
 
yankintx said:
BS The GOP has been obstructing as a policy for 6 years, go BS someone else, kudos to the REAL Conservatives in Congress for having some real Conservative values and not selling out for Chump Care.
Click to expand...

Again. Obstruction as a policy against democrat backed care? Yea. Can't see why any conservative would want to do that. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom