• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senator Who Owns 3 Houses Rails Against Americans Who 'Worship Wealth'

SenorXm/Sirius said:
Bernie Sanders homes? And almost every post here in this thread from Trump supporters resorts to them calling other people names.

LOL. I guess Trump's supporters are getting as desperate and paranoid as Trump.

They reek of desperation.
Click to expand...

Remember how nice these same GOPosters were to Bernie BEFORE the election, playing their Nixon divide and conquer card?

Those of us who have been around since we voted for McGovern tried to warn Berniecrats.

All we got was the liberal purity test and trashed by youngsters who haven't seen the smearing GOP war machine .
 
Van Basten said:
I fail to see the hypocrisy.

BTW, lol @ your source.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that Bernie doesn't own three houses while railing against the rich? I guess as long as a rich Democrat rails against rich Republicans it's alright.
 
Mac77 said:
Yes and he remains one of our most beloved presidents

But I think more for his robust and engaging personality than his policies
Click to expand...

Theodore Roosevelt was against everything the GOP has turned into!

Why do you think he ran against Taft in 1912 ? :lamo
 
Moderate Right said:
So you are saying that Bernie doesn't own three houses while railing against the rich?
Click to expand...

You're the only person saying that.

I guess as long as a rich Democrat rails against rich Republicans it's alright.
Click to expand...

It's about railing against subversive plutocrats, right wing or left wing. Owning multiple homes doesn't make you such a thing.

I'm still waiting for someone to point out the actual hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
Moderate Right said:
So you are saying that Bernie doesn't own three houses while railing against the rich? I guess as long as a rich Democrat rails against rich Republicans it's alright.
Click to expand...

Thanks for trashing Bernie and the West Virginians who loved him on his healthcare townhall.

I hope Berniecrats are paying attention to how GOPs really feel about Bernie, not what you GOPs said BEFORE the election.

I could not have changed the DEM nominee, but must say how much I appreciate what Bernie is doing at this moment for the little guy that voted for trump and is now being **** on by trump .
 
Van Basten said:
You're the only person saying that.



It's about railing against subversive plutocrats, right wing or left wing. Owning multiple homes doesn't make you such a thing.

I'm still waiting for someone to point out the actual hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

In case you didn't realize, the average Joe does not own three homes. Hypocrisy is like when an actor in Hollywood with a 30 million dollar home rails against some CEO on Wall Street.
 
NIMBY said:
Thanks for trashing Bernie and the West Virginians who loved him on his healthcare townhall.

I hope Berniecrats are paying attention to how GOPs really feel about Bernie, not what you GOPs said BEFORE the election.

I could not have changed the DEM nominee, but must say how much I appreciate what Bernie is doing at this moment for the little guy that voted for trump and is now being **** on by trump .
Click to expand...

What? You are saying that GOP'rs should have voted for Bernie?
 
Moderate Right said:
In case you didn't realize, the average Joe does not own three homes. Hypocrisy is like when an actor in Hollywood with a 30 million dollar home rails against some CEO on Wall Street.
Click to expand...

@bold: Not at all.

Anyway, what does that have to do with Bernie?

Again, where is the hypocrisy? I'm waiting.
 
Last edited:
Moderate Right said:
In case you didn't realize, the average Joe does not own three homes. Hypocrisy is like when an actor in Hollywood with a 30 million dollar home rails against some CEO on Wall Street.
Click to expand...

Bernie and his wife have a place in DC and a $100,000 condo in Burlington. Then last summer this happened:

Jane told Seven Days that they had recently sold a house in Maine that had belonged to her family since the 1900s, and used the proceeds to purchase the new property...

Sanders, an outspoken advocate for the working class who spent his 2016 presidential primary campaign railing against income inequality, remains one of the poorer members of Congress, and his net worth is among the lowest in the Senate.

link...​

Bullcrap smear story is just bullcrap.
 
Abbazorkzog said:
LOL Mao is suddenly a Social Democrat. :lamo
Click to expand...

Mao was a socialist. You would be considered a useful idiot by commie standards. A peasant. Slug. Nice, huh?
 
NIMBY said:
Theodore Roosevelt was against everything the GOP has turned into!

Why do you think he ran against Taft in 1912 ? :lamo
Click to expand...

Not quite

He founded the RINO wing of the republican party which still clings to life even though they are hated by the republican base
 
DamnYankee said:
Mao was a socialist. You would be considered a useful idiot by commie standards. A peasant. Slug. Nice, huh?
Click to expand...

Mao was a progressive

So was hitler
 
Sanders.jpg


Blog: Socialist Bernie Sanders spends more than his reported net worth on his third home

"The great thing about being an avowed socialist is that you get to posture as a self-righteous man of the people without forgoing the benefits of wealth. Take the case of Bernie Sanders, whose self-reported net worth was $528,014, yet who just spent a reported $600,000 on a summer “vacation home” with 500 feet of lake frontage on gorgeous Lake Champlain.

What kind of elderly couple spends more than their net worth on a vacation home? Certainly, at a minimum, we can say a couple with no financial worries."?
 
poweRob said:
Bernie and his wife have a place in DC and a $100,000 condo in Burlington. Then last summer this happened:

Jane told Seven Days that they had recently sold a house in Maine that had belonged to her family since the 1900s, and used the proceeds to purchase the new property...

Sanders, an outspoken advocate for the working class who spent his 2016 presidential primary campaign railing against income inequality, remains one of the poorer members of Congress, and his net worth is among the lowest in the Senate.

link...​

Bullcrap smear story is just bullcrap.
Click to expand...

Shame on Jane for inheriting from her family! I mean, we all know how much we on the right detest the idea of being entitled to an inheritance and not forking it over to Uncle Sam.
 
Somerville said:
Only in the minds of willfully ignorant could Mao T'se Tung ever be viewed as a "progressive". Although I suppose if one only refers to that special, super-secret dictionary handed to one when they swear allegiance to their True Beliefs, then yes, I suppose Mao was a "progressive."

Normally, monomaniacal dictators are not seen as progressive.
Click to expand...

Surely you dont think mao was a conservative

He was the progressive of his day

Rejecting religion, capitalism, freedom of thought and action, embracing political correctness as the all-powerful central government and monolithic ruling party defined it.

Mao was the model for millions of young progressives here in America during the late 50's and early 60's
 
Mac77 said:
Surely you dont think mao was a conservative

He was the progressive of his day

Rejecting religion, capitalism, freedom of thought and action, embracing political correctness as the all-powerful central government and monolithic ruling party defined it.

Mao was the model for millions of young progressives here in America during the late 50's and early 60's
Click to expand...

I believe I mentioned "that special, super-secret dictionary handed to one when they swear allegiance to their True Beliefs" for any definition of progressive which one could apply to Mao T'se Tung
 
Somerville said:
I believe I mentioned "that special, super-secret dictionary handed to one when they swear allegiance to their True Beliefs" for any definition of progressive which one could apply to Mao T'se Tung
Click to expand...

What makes you think it doesnt apply to you?

There is very little difference between Mao and millions of progressives in America today
 
Somerville said:
Only in the minds of those proud to share their ignorance of history and reality.
Click to expand...

I am informed enough to know that modern progrtessives could have been communists in the 1930's or Maoists in the 1960's
 
Mac77 said:
I am informed enough to know that modern progrtessives could have been communists in the 1930's or Maoists in the 1960's
Click to expand...

Or if it was the 1770's they would have been the ones fighting against our legal and official government ..............


.......... you know.... the one led by King George.


And those PROGRESSIVES would have been called PATRIOTS and then FOUNDING FATHERS.
 
haymarket said:
Or if it was the 1770's they would have been the ones fighting against our legal and official government ..............


.......... you know.... the one led by King George.


And those PROGRESSIVES would have been called PATRIOTS and then FOUNDING FATHERS.
Click to expand...

Those were special men that the world sees only once in a thousand years.

Modern libs are not even pimples on the ass of our Founding Fathers

But certainly the monsters who led the french revolution just after ours were progressives in the Bill Ayres mold
 
Mac77 said:
Those were special men that the world sees only once in a thousand years.

Modern libs are not even pimples on the ass of our Founding Fathers

But certainly the monsters who led the french revolution just after ours were progressives in the Bill Ayres mold
Click to expand...

Todays right wingers would be yesterdays right wingers in any historical setting. And the right wingers of the 1700's were the Loyalists defending the status quo.
 
Mac77 said:
I am informed enough to know that modern progrtessives could have been communists in the 1930's or Maoists in the 1960's
Click to expand...

You simply are continuing to show the readers that your "knowledge" of the world does not extend past that found on Breitbart, FauxNews, Mark Levin, el Rushbo and similar sources.
 
Mac77 said:
I am informed enough to know that modern progrtessives could have been communists in the 1930's or Maoists in the 1960's
Click to expand...

You were just calling us lefty's fascists. So, are we supposed to be fascists or communists?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom