- Joined
- Jan 25, 2010
- Messages
- 30,725
- Reaction score
- 15,045
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
That argument's often used as a rationalization by those that have decided to hate free markets, but a bit of thinking (and maybe some actual experience in the market place) show that if a person has a choice between owning a factory that generates $10M/year, or owning that factory plus another producing $5M/year, the preference will be for upping total revenue from $10M to $15M.
Yeah, real life is never that simple, like what if the $5M/year factory just happens to be atop ore deposits that can yield $20M/year if the factory is turned into a mine --the debate goes on and on.
It is not just a rationalizat ion but rwait. It happened to my plant. The company closed it down and it was making money, at least 2 million in gross profit per year and transferred production to a different plant they decided to expand and maximize it's utility.
The business is a mature industry so revenue increases come at the expense other companies.