• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Secret Service lost sensitive laptop

A normal person is not stealing Secret Service laptops.

Perhaps not knowlingly. The laptop was in a backpack in her car that she had parked in her Brooklyn home driveway. The backpack was stolen. People get stuff stolen from their cars all the time. It was probably a crime of opportunity and the thief likely had no clue the car belonged to a Secret Service Agent.
 
Because Liberalism can only flourish in crisis. Otherwise, it's a useless agenda

Well that's pretty silly. Liberalism flourishes in a lot of calm, peaceful places.
You're just making crap up because you like how the words sound.
 
Perhaps not knowlingly. The laptop was in a backpack in her car that she had parked in her Brooklyn home driveway. The backpack was stolen. People get stuff stolen from their cars all the time. It was probably a crime of opportunity and the thief likely had no clue the car belonged to a Secret Service Agent.

Wow, a perfectly rational answer and explanation of what may have happened. We should all probably take the rest of the day off!
 
Gawd, that guy was like some subterranean fungus, tendrils reaching throughout the government to weaken the USA.

Obama did say he wanted to weaken the foundation if this country in fundamental ways.
 
Well that's pretty silly. Liberalism flourishes in a lot of calm, peaceful places.
You're just making crap up because you like how the words sound.
You mean like North Korea, Myanmar, and Turkey?
 
You mean like North Korea, Myanmar, and Turkey?

What a dumb post. Why would you think I'm referring to those countries?
Damn. Think before you hit 'reply'.
 
Someone resorting to name calling shouldn't complain about partisan hackery

Would "gullible supporters" be better?

This question is actually generic. It can apply anywhere, not just here. Person A makes an observation that Person B is gullible. And it may just fit. Some people are indeed gullible... as many people on your side have done here, as well, but I digress. How does one specifically describe gullibility without being accused of name calling?
 
Perhaps not knowlingly. The laptop was in a backpack in her car that she had parked in her Brooklyn home driveway. The backpack was stolen. People get stuff stolen from their cars all the time. It was probably a crime of opportunity and the thief likely had no clue the car belonged to a Secret Service Agent.
That's what I think is the most likely scenario. Hell, it's probably in the bottom of the East River by now.
 
It's now Trump's circus, his monkeys.
 
Given the level of encryption on the laptop, it will not be useful to normal people. Only an entity with world class compute power, or as you suggest, an insider, will be able to see what is on the laptop.



Sent from my LG-V930 using Tapatalk

Even with world class computers and people breaking a modern government cipher is a no go.
 
That's what I think is the most likely scenario. Hell, it's probably in the bottom of the East River by now.

I would have loved to see the look on the thief's face when he realized his theft made national news. :)
 
I would have loved to see the look on the thief's face when he realized his theft made national news. :)

tenor.gif
 
When does it switch to Trump's responsibility? Don't need a hard date. A rough estimate would be fine. 90 days? 180 days?

Surely not yet. Right? You act as if this started with President Trump's arrival, when in fact, it was happening before he even announced his candidacy. Anything to cover Obama's ass, though. Right?
 
Would "gullible supporters" be better?

This question is actually generic. It can apply anywhere, not just here. Person A makes an observation that Person B is gullible. And it may just fit. Some people are indeed gullible... as many people on your side have done here, as well, but I digress. How does one specifically describe gullibility without being accused of name calling?

But, you said, "Trump Suckers". That's name calling. I thought you were better than that.
 
Surely not yet. Right? You act as if this started with President Trump's arrival, when in fact, it was happening before he even announced his candidacy. Anything to cover Obama's ass, though. Right?
Is your memory really that short? Here, let me refresh it with a post from earlier in this very thread. Note especially the part highlighted in green...
Just as unrealistic that he influenced things for the positive so soon, too.

Oh, and besides, there have been random breaches since long before either you or I have been alive. They have always happened, and as humans are imperfect they always will happen, especially in a freer society. To lay it on one person is nothing but sheer partisan hackery.
 
Well that's pretty silly. Liberalism flourishes in a lot of calm, peaceful places.
You're just making crap up because you like how the words sound.

Liberals can only promte themselves as saviors. That's why they hate black folks who leave thr plantation. Every ghetto in America is under Democrat control.
 
Liberals can only promte themselves as saviors. That's why they hate black folks who leave thr plantation. Every ghetto in America is under Democrat control.

What does that even mean?
 
Probably too much booze and hookers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What does that even mean?

I wouldn't portray it as he did, but liberals (and other blacks in particular) routinely ridicule conservative blacks as traitors and "Uncle Toms". The black vote is a big part of their base, and we have seen what happens when they don't respond in force.
 
Is your memory really that short? Here, let me refresh it with a post from earlier in this very thread. Note especially the part highlighted in green...

The Secret Service lost some of it's effectiveness under Obama. That's just a reality.
 
What does that even mean?

The plantation; the ghetto. They keep black folks poor, promising a big payoff and that as bad as things are, it would be worse without the Democrats. Evrrybody else hates black folks, ya know.
 
The plantation; the ghetto. They keep black folks poor, promising a big payoff and that as bad as things are, it would be worse without the Democrats. Evrrybody else hates black folks, ya know.

Really? You've seen this?
Show me. Let's see how liberals keep blacks poor.
I think you're just making crap up.
 
Back
Top Bottom