FBI planned to pay creator of discredited dossier to continue work

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...76c69081518_story.html?utm_term=.36ecc132c2bf

Well those are some awful optics.

The was FBI farming investigative work out to a private foreign contractor who was under the direct employment of a political candidate to conduct an investigation on her opponent? That stinks to high heaven.

Sure does.
I'd like to believe it was a bit of a rogue operation but given what's been happening ........................................

jmotivator said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...76c69081518_story.html?utm_term=.36ecc132c2bf

Well those are some awful optics.

The was FBI farming investigative work out to a private foreign contractor who was under the direct employment of a political candidate to conduct an investigation on her opponent? That stinks to high heaven.

Click to expand...

Let's see from the article:

The former British spy who authored a controversial dossier on behalf of Donald Trump’s political opponents alleging ties between Trump and Russia reached an agreement with the FBI a few weeks before the election for the bureau to pay him to continue his work, according to several people familiar with the arrangement.

Click to expand...

There's those anonymous sources again.....FAKE NEWS!

Praxas said:

Let's see from the article:

There's those anonymous sources again.....FAKE NEWS!

Click to expand...

LOL! If you want to start discounting anonymous sources then I guess we're done here because that is all that the Democrats have at this point!

Thanks for playing.

We will find out soon enough how much of this story is true, however, because the WaPo just put Comey on the hot seat.

Grassley Letter to James Comey

Praxas said:

Let's see from the article:



There's those anonymous sources again.....FAKE NEWS!

Click to expand...

So you believe the months and months of MSM reporting about top law enforcement agencies investigating the Trump campaign/administration, we're lying? Wow, I could have sworn you cited some of these articles and news reports. Am I wrong?

countryboy said:

So you believe the months and months of MSM reporting about top law enforcement agencies investigating the Trump campaign/administration, we're lying? Wow, I could have sworn you cited some of these articles and news reports. Am I wrong?

Click to expand...

Anonymous sources say that Praxas did not.

jmotivator said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...76c69081518_story.html?utm_term=.36ecc132c2bf

Well those are some awful optics.

The was FBI farming investigative work out to a private foreign contractor who was under the direct employment of a political candidate to conduct an investigation on her opponent? That stinks to high heaven.

Click to expand...

It is obvious that the Clinton supporters and a British spy were colluding to influence the outcome a USA election and still are. This Russia BS is all over the place. The FBI is not smelling too good according to this article, although if this spy had been an asset previously, then some credibility would have been attributed to his work. However, the FBI dropped him and that should end the issue. The Russian issue is a phony MSM agenda, with help from Intelligence Agency/ies to destabilize Trump and maintain the NEOCON's Cold War against Russia. There's lots of money in those Permanent War agendas, the NWO, and Coroporate Fascism.

Praxas said:

Let's see from the article:



There's those anonymous sources again.....FAKE NEWS!

Click to expand...

nyah nyah, my anonymous sources can beat up your anonymous sources.

jmotivator said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...76c69081518_story.html?utm_term=.36ecc132c2bf

Well those are some awful optics.

The was FBI farming investigative work out to a private foreign contractor who was under the direct employment of a political candidate to conduct an investigation on her opponent? That stinks to high heaven.

Click to expand...

I think I understand your confusion. You’re confusing “research firm” with conservative think tank or polling firm. They will conclude what you pay them to conclude. The fact that Hillary supporters and a republican paid a research firm to investigate Trump doesn’t dispute the firm’s research. As the article said the fact that the FBI was willing to pay this source and had paid him before for his work on FIFA only proves his credibility.

for future reference, this is what a "bad optic" looks like and actually "stinks to high heaven." trump campaign communicating with the Russians during the campaign then Trump calling America murders too to defend Russia. And trump calling "nato obsolete" has an unpleasant smell also.