• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russians

Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

No, he just let her walk. He was in on the fix.

Neither side has confidence in Comey now. So I think we can both agree that he needs to resign...even if it is for different reasons.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

He had to let her walk because she didn't commit a crime that he could charge her with.

Would you like me to list them because they have charged plenty of people for less offenses.
I even talked to a military man who said if he did so much as leave a classified file on a desk he would have been discharged.
is proof enough that she absolutely did commit a crime in which it was covered up because she would have been disqualified
For running for president.

Comey is a joke.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Or, maybe he told them the same thing and the Senate isn't investigating what you think.

The Senate is investigating Russian infiltration and influence in the US election. So either the house GOP doesn't care....or they didn't get the same briefing that the senate got. Judging by the reaction of the house after the meeting ...I'm guessing it's the latter...because I hate to think they don't care.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Would you like me to list them because they have charged plenty of people for less offenses.
I even talked to a military man who said if he did so much as leave a classified file on a desk he would have been discharged.
is proof enough that she absolutely did commit a crime in which it was covered up because she would have been disqualified
For running for president.

Comey is a joke.

Don't bother...your list has already been debunked countless times.

The ignorance of the right wing is a joke, too.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

If Comey was in on the fix, then these additional FBI criminal investigations are probably not going to go anywhere either, or is that controlled by DOJ & Sessions?
(well, at least until he recuses himself from these cases as well I suppose :roll:).

‘Not Over’: 4 Legal Probes Hillary Clinton Still Faces
Fred Lucas November 10, 2016 /
http://dailysignal.com/2016/11/10/not-over-4-legal-probes-hillary-clinton-still-faces/

Now it is controlled by sessions. Not that hack lynch.
He should direct the FBI towards better investigation unlike lynch.

However trump needs to fire Comey.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Don't bother...your list has already been debunked countless times.

The ignorance of the right wing is a joke, too.

No it hasn't because the law says it isn't no matter how much you stamp your feet.

Clinton removed classified material from a secure area. Check.
Like in 1998 the director of the CIA brought classified material home just like clinton he was fired shortly after even though he never intended to do anything wrong. Check.

Transmitted classified material over an unsecure line check.

Allowed classified material to be printed or faxed to an unsecure location check.
Deleted emails that should have been turned over to the federal government check.

You seem to not have learned from the last time you were proven 100% wrong on this.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Neither side has confidence in Comey now. So I think we can both agree that he needs to resign...even if it is for different reasons.

I think we can both agree on that one Moot. He's been far too overly involved in political machinations in the last calendar year. More than what is good for the FBI and the DOJ, but I think that getting politicized was something that was forced on him from above.

I don't recall Comey and the FBI being nearly as politicized during the Bush administration, which, IIRC, appointed him.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

This thread isn't about Clinton, which seems to have escaped your notice.


Sigint from Russians discussing their Trump links

US spies have 'considerable intelligence' on high-level Trump-Russia talks, claims ex-NSA analyst | The Independent

John R. Schindler is professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College, where he’s been since 2005, and where he teaches courses on security, strategy, intelligence, terrorism, and occasionally military history. Before joining the NWC faculty, he spent nearly a decade with the National Security Agency as an intelligence analyst and counterintelligence officer. There’s not much he can say about that, except that he worked problems in Eastern Europe and the Middle East with a counterespionage flavor, and he collaborated closely with other government agencies who would probably prefer he didn’t mention them. He’s also served as an officer specializing in cryptology (now called information warfare for no particular reason) in theU.S. Navy Reserve.
John Schindler - Business Insider

businessinsider.com is John R. Schindler's own blog.

I wonder how someone who hasn't been with the NSA since 2005 would have knowledge of "US spies" intelligence on recent events.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Now it is controlled by sessions. Not that hack lynch.
He should direct the FBI towards better investigation unlike lynch.

However trump needs to fire Comey.

Yeah, Comey's compromised himself and the FBI getting embroiled in (or sucked into) the politics of the last calendar year. Much more so than what is good for him or the FBI, i think.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

There is no evidence of any Rooski hokey pokey. This was just another Obama Snowflake myth and fairy tale.

Apparently the FISA court requests DO exist - which is a serious problem for the Left if those transcripts don’t.

Someone’s gonna have to explain why the tap request was made, rejected, modified, resubmitted, granted, and revealed absolutely nothing - when there was nothing to justify the initial request, and the second the result of BS word games.

More popcorn?
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

There is no evidence of any Rooski hokey pokey. This was just another Obama Snowflake myth and fairy tale.

Apparently the FISA court requests DO exist - which is a serious problem for the Left if those transcripts don’t.

Someone’s gonna have to explain why the tap request was made, rejected, modified, resubmitted, granted, and revealed absolutely nothing - when there was nothing to justify the initial request, and the second the result of BS word games.

More popcorn?

I bet if you compare the time frame of the request to the narrative that the liberals were pushing that trump was conspiring with putin they will be closely aligned, or shortly right after each other.
maybe that was why the huge push was made in the paper to try and justify the wiretap on trump tower but they couldn't make a real connection.

no judge would actually authorize a real warrant to tap the line so they tried to circumvent the system through the fisa court.
that sounds like something that Obama would do.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

This thread isn't about Clinton, which seems to have escaped your notice.


Sigint from Russians discussing their Trump links

US spies have 'considerable intelligence' on high-level Trump-Russia talks, claims ex-NSA analyst | The Independent
The former agent said that intelligence has been gathered from the NSA and its partners from intercepted electronic and communication signals.

Were any of these "intercepted electronic and communication signals" picked up from Trump Tower? :roll:
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

There is no evidence of any Rooski hokey pokey.
The FISA warrants are evidence that there are some foreign intelligence agents somewhere in the mix.
You may not find the evidence compelling, but it still exists.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Were any of these "intercepted electronic and communication signals" picked up from Trump Tower? :roll:

Are foreign intelligence agents transmitting "electronic and communication signals" from Trump Towers?
If they are, and they're being monitored, is that the same thing as tapping Trump's phone?

The WH says that Trump didn't actually mean that his phones were tapped.
Trump really only meant that IF his phones were tapped, Congress should look into it.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Are foreign intelligence agents transmitting "electronic and communication signals" from Trump Towers?
If they are, and they're being monitored, is that the same thing as tapping Trump's phone?

The WH says that Trump didn't actually mean that his phones were tapped.
Trump really only meant that IF his phones were tapped, Congress should look into it.

Dude seriously, if I want to play silly back and forth games with someone I'll go find a lib.
 
Re: Democratic Sen. Chris Coons: No ‘hard evidence of collusion’ between Trump/Russia

Dude seriously, if I want to play silly back and forth games with someone I'll go find a lib.
I mean no offense.

You quoted a section of the article which talks about how the NSA and its partners intercepted electronic and communication signals of high-level Russians talking about their collusion with Team Trump.

Then you asked if any of these electronic and communication signals of high-level Russians talking about their collusion were from Trump Tower.

How could the electronic and communication signals of high-level Russians be coming from Trump Towers unless there were high-level Russians talking about their collusion while in Trump Tower?

It seems a legitimate question.
 
Back
Top Bottom