• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guccifer may have been the DNC

Right, it's Putin's slime.
You people will never read anything that contradicts what you believe.
Like a ****ing religion.

And you believe any source as long as it says what you want to hear.... Get a grip.
 
It would also explain why the DNC never turned their servers over to the FBI, for investigation.

I always found that whole aspect fascinating that people either ignored or where ignorant of. The FBI nor our intel services actually did forensics on their servers. They only got a report from a 3rd party contractor and yet they were talking about all this proof.

Why would they keep the FBI and everyone else out if this is such a big deal? I feel like the government should have subpoenaed the servers and taken them regardless.
 
I always found that whole aspect fascinating that people either ignored or where ignorant of. The FBI nor our intel services actually did forensics on their servers. They only got a report from a 3rd party contractor and yet they were talking about all this proof.

Why would they keep the FBI and everyone else out if this is such a big deal? I feel like the government should have subpoenaed the servers and taken them regardless.

Assuming the information in the link is true, the FBI searching the servers would of led to the Russia story being bull****.
Which would of been bad, but probably wouldn't have sunk Hillary's campaign, but then they'd have to apologize to Russia for smearing their name and they'd have to find who actually leaked the emails.

I fairly certain now, that the Russia narrative is total crap, that it was a convenient excuse to both blame Russia, delegitimize Wikileaks and cover for their own incompetency.
It was incredibly successful though.
Hell we have Congress, newspapers and people freaking out over nothing, putting the WhiteHouse in constant defensive mode.
 
Out of curiosity, if Wikileaks is such a joke then why are so many people looking to investigate them and their relation to the Trump campaign and Russia?

Do you really require an explanation on this?

Wikileaks is not reliable as a source of unbiased, non-cherry-picked facts. But they absolutely deserve to be held accountable.

Unless, of course, you believe that some institutions and people deserve the right to be above the law. Do you?
 
Hey all, I'm Adam Carter, author of the G2:Game Over article.

Iguanaman & Phys251...

The evidence is laid out for anyone to review. The original source files are still on Guccifer2's blog, you can download them and verify what I've reported very easily (plenty of other people already have done). I can't force you to accept the information I've uncovered but smearing me and my work just because you personally refuse to accept it... is pretty low.

As for the baseless "Putin Propaganda" accusations, please know I'm actually a Brit, I don't speak Russian, have never been to Russia (or known any Russians personally) and the sources I've used are pretty much all US/UK MSM and of course from the subject of my investigation, Guccifer2 himself. - It's all research done off my own back without any help from any state entities. I'm just a director of IT company in the UK that thought he'd double check on everything reported and see if there were further clues that CrowdStrike/ThreatConnect/etc may have missed... and it turns out there were several things they missed.
 
Hey all, I'm Adam Carter, author of the G2:Game Over article.

Iguanaman & Phys251...

The evidence is laid out for anyone to review. The original source files are still on Guccifer2's blog, you can download them and verify what I've reported very easily (plenty of other people already have done). I can't force you to accept the information I've uncovered but smearing me and my work just because you personally refuse to accept it... is pretty low.

As for the baseless "Putin Propaganda" accusations, please know I'm actually a Brit, I don't speak Russian, have never been to Russia (or known any Russians personally) and the sources I've used are pretty much all US/UK MSM and of course from the subject of my investigation, Guccifer2 himself. - It's all research done off my own back without any help from any state entities. I'm just a director of IT company in the UK that thought he'd double check on everything reported and see if there were further clues that CrowdStrike/ThreatConnect/etc may have missed... and it turns out there were several things they missed.

Moderator's Warning:
Hello, I'm CaptainCourtesy, one of the Moderators on this site. You may NOT, under any circumstances, do something like this again. Any personal issues that you may have for any poster is not to be posted in the way that you did. Do not do this again.
 
Back
Top Bottom