• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015

Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Up to 30 Senate Democrats (!) met with Russian diplomats in 2015 to help grease the skids for Obama's Iran deal

Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015 – twitchy.com


Maybe Sessions should announce he’s investigating the “Moscow 30”

Did those legislators, while under oath, declare they had not had contact with Russians when indeed they had?
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Did those legislators, while under oath, declare they had not had contact with Russians when indeed they had?

These guys tickle me with their constant attempts at miss-direction. They are getting very uncomfortable for some reason or another.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Did those legislators, while under oath, declare they had not had contact with Russians when indeed they had?

Did you even pay attention to the question that was asked?
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Up to 30 Senate Democrats (!) met with Russian diplomats in 2015 to help grease the skids for Obama's Iran deal

Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015 – twitchy.com


Maybe Sessions should announce he’s investigating the “Moscow 30”

sessions won't be investigating anyone--president trump/bannon will launch him sooner than they did Flynn--though Miller will be upset .
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

If they lied under oath about it I agree.

In January, Senator Leahy asked Sessions for answers to written questions as part of his Senate confirmation process. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties," Leahy wrote. "Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?”

"No," Sessions responded.


Prove thats a lie
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Up to 30 Senate Democrats (!) met with Russian diplomats in 2015 to help grease the skids for Obama's Iran deal

Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015 – twitchy.com


Maybe Sessions should announce he’s investigating the “Moscow 30”

He Swings!...and he misses the side of the Barn....PLease Try again!

One thing I really don't understand is Why are you so nonchalant but your AG or President talking to Russian spies...You do realize they are still the enemies AND not member of the YOUR conservative/republican party...yes???


Diving Mullah
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Yes, and I, unlike Sessions, was aware of the current political turmoil.

So you know that he didn't lie.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Did you even pay attention to the question that was asked?

Was someone being mean to your buddy? Do you need your safe space?
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Was someone being mean to your buddy? Do you need your safe space?

Liberals are being blatantly dishonest with their claim he lied. What was the time frame the question was speaking towards? Do you know?
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Up to 30 Senate Democrats (!) met with Russian diplomats in 2015 to help grease the skids for Obama's Iran deal

Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 2015 – twitchy.com


Maybe Sessions should announce he’s investigating the “Moscow 30”

Were any of these Senators part of a campaign? Did any of them lie under oath about it?

Sessions could have avoided this by saying that he did talk to the Russian ambassador as part of his work with the Senate Foreign Relations committee. I would accept that. He didn't. Instead, he lied. I guess all is acceptable as long as they voted for Trump!
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

Liberals are being blatantly dishonest with their claim he lied. What was the time frame the question was speaking towards? Do you know?

We both know that you're really upset because of your little crush on volsrock.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

We both know that you're really upset because of your little crush on volsrock.

What? That came out of left field.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

What? That came out of left field.

You're running around defending him in all of his threads.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

You're running around defending him in all of his threads.

What? What are you even talking about? I wasn't speaking towards volsrock.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

In January, Senator Leahy asked Sessions for answers to written questions as part of his Senate confirmation process. “Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties," Leahy wrote. "Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?”

"No," Sessions responded.


Prove thats a lie

That isn't the statement that has gotten him into trouble. It is the uncaveated one he verbally gave to Al Franken under oath. Though I don't think it is clear cut enough to warrant charges. He could say the "about the campaign" was implied.
 
Re: Oopsie! Up to 30 Democrats should resign for meeting with Russian diplomats in 20

That isn't the statement that has gotten him into trouble. It is the uncaveated one he verbally gave to Al Franken under oath. Though I don't think it is clear cut enough to warrant charges. He could say the "about the campaign" was implied.

Here's Senator Franken's full question:

FRANKEN: CNN has just published a story, and I'm telling you this about a news story that's just been published, I'm not expecting you to know whether or not it's true or not. But CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president elect last week that included information that quote, "Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump." These documents also, allegedly, say quote, "there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.

Now again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out so...uh...you know...But, if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious. And if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

“I’m not aware of any of those activities,” Sessions responded. “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.”

Sessions was specifically referring to communication with Russians in his capacity as a surrogate for the campaign, the only capacity that was relevant to Senator Franken's question. He is not, as some have suggested, referring to conversations he might have had with a Russian ambassador while carrying out his duties as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Again, the context of Franken's question is important. The Minnesota Senator was asking him specifically about alleged meetings between Trump surrogates and a shadowy cabal of Russian intelligence agents, not ambassadors he may have spoken to in his capacity as a U.S. Senator.

Of course, the facts of this matter will go largely ignored, abandoned by the opposition media in an effort to smear Attorney General Sessions and push the Russia narrative into several more news cycles.

No, Attorney General Jeff Sessions DID NOT Lie Under Oath | The Sean Hannity Show
 
Back
Top Bottom