• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jeff sessions condemns perjury during bill clinton impeachment trial in 1999

Read the op and all the other Trump-Putin revelations. The picture is coming into focus. I don't expect you to look at it though.

still waiting on proof or evidence to support your argument this isn't it.
100% positive you have no evidence to support your argument.
 
still waiting on proof or evidence to support your argument this isn't it.
100% positive you have no evidence to support your argument.

Why would just reelected GOP Sen. Portman of Ohio call for recusal ?
 
still waiting on proof or evidence to support your argument this isn't it.
100% positive you have no evidence to support your argument.

lol...keep denying the obvious. It's very entertaining.
 
Why would just reelected GOP Sen. Portman of Ohio call for recusal ?

you once again prove you don't know what you are talking about.
you just jumped into the middle of something. I suggest you go back and read
the argument then you will know what is being talked about.
 
proof or evidence to back up your argument.

is coming, day by day---lock HIM up--why would GOP House Oversight chair Chaffetz call for recusal.

sessions won't last as long as Flynn .
 
you once again prove you don't know what you are talking about.
you just jumped into the middle of something. I suggest you go back and read
the argument then you will know what is being talked about.

Are you saying that Sen. Portman DIDN'T call for recusal ?
 
than you for proving you have no evidence to support your claim.

Evidence is piling up. It's your choice whether or not you look at it.
 
Back
Top Bottom