• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can you say SPECIAL PROSECUTOR? Its coming!!!

ludin said:
I personally don't care. he passed the required FEC financial audit.
that is all that matters.
Click to expand...

But did you see his Birth Certificate or that not requirement for him?
 
Mac77 said:
A lot of smoke to impress the usual anti trumpster and give them hope but no substance

Yes it will be a thorn in the president's side but it wont put hillary in the white house
Click to expand...



Crocked Cheeto :lamo
 
haymarket said:
Actually Sessions told Senator Franken he had NO contact with the Russians. Period.




Why would a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee meet twice with the Russian ambassador including at a political convention after it had come out that the Russians were trying to influence the election?

Joe Scarborough just said on TV this morning that he was for 8 years on the House Armed Services committee and NEVER met with ambassadors as that was the province of the Foreign Relations committee. Senator Claire McCaskill said much the same thing.

Sessions so called explanation simply does not pass the smell test.
Click to expand...

Do you not understand what surrogate means? What this is >IS another witch hunt.

Keep it up, America is watching.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Sorry, IMO this is a tempest in a teapot.
Click to expand...

You can characterize any way you want to do so but in a very short time the Attorney General of the United States will recuse himself from all matters related to any investigation of the Russian interference in our election on behalf of Donald Trumps candidacy. That is a major big time huge development.

Those who did not live through Watergate are at a serious disadvantage here since they cannot remember how the entire episode was a lengthy series of connecting one dot after another and each dot moving closer and closer to the top dog until eventually they defanged and neutered him.

This has all the same feeling and dynamic.
 
TheGoverness said:
Then why didn't he just say that? Instead he said this:



Sessions Met With Russian Ambassador but Didn't Mislead Senate: Spokeswoman

If it truly is the case that he was just referring to his role as a Senator (which may very well be the case), then he should have cleared that up in front of the Senate, so something like this wouldn't have happened.
Click to expand...

I agree. Maybe he should also be asked questions that don't deal with [at the time] a suspect/uncorroborated article from CNN.
 
ludin said:
irrelevant to the topic.
Click to expand...

Its revelant in the minds of liberals who are seeking revenge for affronts to their Dear Leader
 
Last edited:
Cigar said:
"I Did Not Have Communications With The Russians"


... that lying SOB

Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.d3d0d986cb7c

View attachment 67214662
Click to expand...

One could take that position and certainly would, if one were agitating against Trump. And there is no question that this fellow should have thought of his contacts and mentioned them even, if they had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
 
haymarket said:
The only ones deaf seem to be right winger apologists for Trump watching Fox & Friends since these stories are being heard loud and clear this morning........

What MAJORITY of people are you referring to?
Click to expand...

:lamo

When does one know a alt-lefter has no argument? When they include "Fox & Friends" in their responses.

What majority? Oh, I think an indicator would be the 76% of the people who approved of President Trumps speech before Congress.

What's interesting is the radical effort being orchestrated by EX President Obama and the globalist forces who control him.

These dog whistles the minions are trained to respond to are only resonating to the afflicted.

Unfortunately, the whistle blowers are already looked upon by the general population as corrupt and biased. If the effort is to manipulate public opinion, it's a poor strategy to destroy credibility first, and then expect to be taken seriously second.
 
joG said:
One could take that position and certainly would, if one were agitating against Trump. And there is no question that this fellow should have thought of his contacts and mentioned them even, if they had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

Official meetings in his capital office are not "communications" between the trump campaign and the russians
 
ludin said:
irrelevant to the topic.
Click to expand...

That 8 year Birth Certificate Lie by Don Cheeto was always Relevant to Racist ... all you have to do is ask those Instigators in Hawaii ;)
 
WCH said:
Keep it up, America is watching.
Click to expand...

Unless America is watching Fox & Friends this morning. Then they are not getting this important information.
 
ocean515 said:
:lamo

When does one know a alt-lefter has no argument? When they include "Fox & Friends" in their responses.
Click to expand...

It speaks to the bias of the right.

What majority? Oh, I think an indicator would be the 76% of the people who approved of President Trumps speech before Congress
Click to expand...
.

First - a decided MINORITY of people - 48 million - which is even less than voted for Trump - watched that speech. So your supposed MAJORITY is a majority of a small minority to begin with.

That is NOT any sort of vote of approval for Trump, his policies or any endorsement of the Trump administration. Its people saying he did a decent job in one speech because of his lowered and more reasoned tone. And today all that is gone with the wind.

But that was not your contention

Despite the laughable antics of the discredited NYT, WaPo, and apparently anxious to join the list, WSJ, the majority of people are looking forward, while the dwindling number living in the Progressive bubble can only respond to commands in hopes their rudderless lives can once again be controlled by the central office.
Click to expand...

You said that the MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FORWARD - whatever that vague insight is suppose to mean. When challenged you attempt to move the goal posts talking about a poll of a speech which does NOT say what you claimed in the first place.
 
Last edited:
haymarket said:
You can characterize any way you want to do so but in a very short time the Attorney General of the United States will recuse himself from all matters related to any investigation of the Russian interference in our election on behalf of Donald Trumps candidacy. That is a major big time huge development.

Those who did not live through Watergate are at a serious disadvantage here since they cannot remember how the entire episode was a lengthy series of connecting one dot after another and each dot moving closer and closer to the top dog until eventually they defanged and neutered him.

This has all the same feeling and dynamic.
Click to expand...

I did live through Watergate, and this is NOT the "same dynamic."

Back then WaPo was investigating a true crime, with clear evidence starting with the arrest of a bunch of bumbling idiots for breaking into the DNC Headquarters at the Watergate building in D.C.

Here it is just innuendo and/or sensationalized distortion of the facts to meet a political agenda.

The losers are seeking any thread to tie into their belief that they could only have lost the election by cheating or some foreign plot.

Never mind that their own candidate was a horror-show political hack with more skeletons in her own closet than Trump had. :roll:

What they are doing is actually creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. They want to believe Trump is a stooge for the Russians. They expect he is their Siberian Candidate.

But they are creating the very atmosphere that gives Russia power to influence our government in the ways they believe it can. Now with this supposed "lie" of the Attorney-General they give the Russian's the power to say "Yes, he talked to us about his campaign" as a direct blackmail tool if they want to try to influence the Trump Presidency.

What neither the Dems nor the Russian's seem to realize is that Mr. Trump doesn't play that game. This is clear from everything he has done up to now. He'll just tell them to do their worst and to hell with the consequences...he's going to run things his way.

IMO the creation of this scenario will be all the fault of special interests and organizations like these yellow-journalist press. :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:
These lunatic fringe leftists have posted more "Trump is Hitler" posts in 7 weeks of the Trump Presidency than all Conservatives combined posted about Obama in 8 years.
Overall, most Democrats approve of Trump and that number is growing daily. Reasonable, rational people see that he is on the right track and a recent well regarded national research poll proved it.

Sometimes you really have to wonder the true motivation of all these "Destroy Trump" threads.
What has Trump REALLY done (other than stand for the nation's best interests)?

By all factual standards, Trump has been one of Americas best Presidents two months in if national interests are of any concern that is.

Why should those calling Trump evil be assumed innocent and pure? Perhaps they are not. And that is what needs to be remembered.
 
Captain Adverse said:
IMO the creation of this scenario will be all the fault of special interests and organizations like these yellow-journalist press. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

Naturally, because both the Trump Cult and the Trump administration itself are constitutionally incapable of accepting responsibility for their actions or assuming any semblance of personal accountability. It's ALWAYS someone else's fault.
 
Cigar said:
But did you see his Birth Certificate or that not requirement for him?
Click to expand...

That's only required for black dudes.

How did I do? Did I live up to your expectations? Gawd I hope so.
 
haymarket said:
It speaks to the bias of the right.

.

That is NOT any sort of vote of approval for Trump, his policies or any endorsement of the Trump administration. Its people saying he did a decent job in one speech because of his lowered and more reasoned tone. And today all that is gone with the wind.
Click to expand...

LOL

Speaks to bias of the right? No, it speaks of the intellectual vacancy of the alt-lefters who use it.

The highest rated program on Fox is the O'Reilly Factor, which has an average audience of @ 3 million+. That is 1/5th the audience of the left's Network news broadcasts.

That is, I don't know, 1/20th the audience of the overall number of people who consume the output of the left's MSM partners.

Considering the 10's of millions who voted for President Trump, and the 30 million or so who approved of his speech before Congress, it's rather clear to anyone with even a tiny sliver of intellectual capacity that Fox & Friends is not something they ever watch.

But keep clinging to the talking points they feed you. It does confirm any things.
 
countryboy said:
That's only required for black dudes.

How did I do? Did I live up to your expectations? Gawd I hope so.
Click to expand...


Just call it the way it is ...

BTW, did admitting on TV to grabbing Women bother you at all ... or was that alwyite with you? :2razz:
 
I am not ready to say a special prosecutor is needed, but I certainly believe that a special investigator is more than justified. His campaign actions and subsequent answers in his confirmation hearing certainly represent very "questionable" judgements from our chief law enforcement officer. In addition, a 911 type commission is likely the only way to put all of this Russian election interference to rest.
 
Simon W. Moon said:
Is this a gut-feeling common-sense thing?
Or is there reliable data which led you to this conclusion?
Click to expand...

A major, well respected poll was published a few days ago that found this.
I posted the link in another thread but will have to find it again to re-post it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom