• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Next womens march co-organized by a terrorist

VanceMack said:
Oh I'm not surprised (hence the shocking/not shocking comment).

Its actually comical watching leftists that **** themselves over a baker that will gladly and cheerfully serve gay customers...but wont cater a gay wedding tha will then proudly declare they are Muslims in solidarity with Muslims...that throw homosexuals from towers for the crime of being gay. That's the sin of the contrarian...they prove they don't just compromise their principles, values, and morals. They prove they have no principles, values, and morals.

And sure....this march can be organized by a terrorist. Hell, our last president studied at the feet of an unrepentant terrorist.
Click to expand...

That's because it's all about the appearance of being righteous and good, not about actually standing for anything.
 
Henrin said:
That's because it's all about the appearance of being righteous and good, not about actually standing for anything.
Click to expand...

Fortunately the Right completely abandoned all pretenses of being righteous and good when they voted for a man who conned thousands of Americans out of nearly a quarter billion dollars and brags about grabbing women by the ******s. It was irritating having to listen to their condescending talk about being the party of virtue, but now they can be dismissed out of hand.
 
Cardinal said:
Do you think bringing up a candidate who lost four months ago and has been virtually absent from the news since then in every thread that has nothing to do with her makes you look rational?
Click to expand...

people like you assume anyone who didn't fluff Hillary-or at least damn Trump daily-are not rational so no matter what I say, you will pretend that I am not rational. Its another reason why you all lost--you cannot fathom that anyone would actually prefer Trump over your beloved Joan of Ark(ansas)
 
TurtleDude said:
people like you assume anyone who didn't fluff Hillary-or at least damn Trump daily-are not rational so no matter what I say, you will pretend that I am not rational. Its another reason why you all lost--you cannot fathom that anyone would actually prefer Trump over your beloved Joan of Ark(ansas)
Click to expand...

There you go again. Ranting yet again about Clinton in a thread where nobody was talking about her. Did she turn you down for a date or something?
 
Cardinal said:
There you go again. Ranting yet again about Clinton in a thread where nobody was talking about her. Did she turn you down for a date or something?
Click to expand...

There you go again, trying to pretend that Trump was elected in a vacuum and your aching rear end has nothing to do with your patron saint not being canonized by the Electoral College
 
TurtleDude said:
There you go again, trying to pretend that Trump was elected in a vacuum and your aching rear end has nothing to do with your patron saint not being canonized by the Electoral College
Click to expand...

You never answered my question. When you picture Hillary Clinton, is she fully clothed?
 
Cardinal said:
You never answered my question. When you picture Hillary Clinton, is she fully clothed?
Click to expand...

if someone pictures hillary clinton any other way they must have some strange fetishes and a really strong stomach. But if that is what turns you on-so be it
 
TurtleDude said:
if someone pictures hillary clinton any other way they must have some strange fetishes and a really strong stomach. But if that is what turns you on-so be it
Click to expand...

I have to get to work now. Good luck with your strange Clinton obsession.
 
Cardinal said:
I have to get to work now. Good luck with your strange Clinton obsession.
Click to expand...

hopefully TURDs won't hamper your job performance :mrgreen:
 
Cardinal said:
The Right will continue to spend all of their energy attempting to discredit protests and town hall meetings in which citizens are critical of the Right's policies. It's to be expected and Republicans should be ignored out of hand when they do this.
Click to expand...

Well at least they are willing to do town halls unlike the left . Paid bullies and terrorists is all the liberals have left ! :lol:
 
Socrates1 said:
Well at least they are willing to do town halls unlike the left . Paid bullies and terrorists is all the liberals have left ! :lol:
Click to expand...

SOME GOP congress critters were willing to hold town halls, most them refused or failed to show up for scheduled events

As critics clamor to be heard, Republicans avoid town hall forums

During the first two months of the new Congress, the 292 Republicans have scheduled just 88 in-person town hall events, according to analysis from Legistorm. Of those 88 events, 35 were scheduled by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin. By comparison, a look at the same time period during the previous Congress (in 2015) saw 222 in-person town hall events hosted by Republicans.
Click to expand...

Comstock a no-show at weekend town halls

Then there was the dumbest man in Congress, Louie Gohmert (R-TX) who refused to hold a town hall because “the threat of violence at town hall meetings.” and then brought up the shooting of Gabby Gifford as another reason. Ms Gifford eviscerated the coward, “To the politicians who have abandoned their civic obligations, I say this: Have some courage. “Face your constituents. Hold town halls.”
 
Sweden said:
Of course. Much of today's left regards the killing of Jews, any Jews, as a good thing.
Click to expand...

That is quite possibly one of the most ignorant statements I've ever seen on this site.
 
Somerville said:
SOME GOP congress critters were willing to hold town halls, most them refused or failed to show up for scheduled events



Comstock a no-show at weekend town halls

Then there was the dumbest man in Congress, Louie Gohmert (R-TX) who refused to hold a town hall because “the threat of violence at town hall meetings.” and then brought up the shooting of Gabby Gifford as another reason. Ms Gifford eviscerated the coward, “To the politicians who have abandoned their civic obligations, I say this: Have some courage. “Face your constituents. Hold town halls.”
Click to expand...

Democrats hold lie fests . :lol:
 
TurtleDude said:
Trump won the election. Hillary lost-get over it.
Click to expand...

If he hadn't, then no one would be worried about the Emoluments clause, or about border walls, or millions of illegal aliens voting, or thousands of Muslims celebrating the attack of 9/11, or balancing the budget while increasing military spending and cutting taxes.

No, we'd all be focused on emails.
 
Dittohead not! said:
If he hadn't, then no one would be worried about the Emoluments clause, or about border walls, or millions of illegal aliens voting, or thousands of Muslims celebrating the attack of 9/11, or balancing the budget while increasing military spending and cutting taxes.

No, we'd all be focused on emails.
Click to expand...

we who pay most of the taxes would be worried about how much more the Democraps would want to take and we who own guns would be worried about the Democraps doing to the whole country what they have done in CT and California
 
TurtleDude said:
we who pay most of the taxes would be worried about how much more the Democraps would want to take and we who own guns would be worried about the Democraps doing to the whole country what they have done in CT and California
Click to expand...
Correct. We'd be worried about our perceptions of the parties and their stance on gun control and taxes as well. Maybe the gun makers would once again be busily increasing production to keep up with demand by people who were sure that the Democrats were coming to get their guns.

How many did Obama confiscate, again?
 
Dittohead not! said:
Correct. We'd be worried about our perceptions of the parties and their stance on gun control and taxes as well. Maybe the gun makers would once again be busily increasing production to keep up with demand by people who were sure that the Democrats were coming to get their guns.

How many did Obama confiscate, again?
Click to expand...

we have educated you on why that didn't happen federally and it wasn't because Obama opposed such things

in California any firearm magazine that holds more than 10 rounds is contraband. no grandfathering. Obama judges will vote on that soon enough

how do you think Kagan and Quotamayor will rule?
 
TurtleDude said:
we have educated you on why that didn't happen federally and it wasn't because Obama opposed such things

in California any firearm magazine that holds more than 10 rounds is contraband. no grandfathering. Obama judges will vote on that soon enough

how do you think Kagan and Quotamayor will rule?
Click to expand...

Does that mean you're so worried that the SCOTUS will overturn the Second Amendment that you'd rather have a serial liar in the White House?

I'd be more worried about the First, the Fourth and the Fifth than the Second myself, but that's just me. I've heard so much about how the feds want to come confiscate all of our guns for so long that it just doesn't matter that much any more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom