• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump just gave a weapons-grade crazy press conference

Erod said:
...in other words, polls are worthless.
Click to expand...

No, they serve a purpose, mostly for the campaigns. Polls tell them where to best direct their resources. The HRC campaign did a disastrous job of reading the polls.
 
Kobie said:
No, they serve a purpose, mostly for the campaigns. Polls tell them where to best direct their resources. The HRC campaign did a disastrous job of reading the polls.
Click to expand...

So did the media, which was in full Hillary celebration mode about 6 pm EST on election day. The gloom and doom that slowly set in was glorious to behold. They bitched about the polls for weeks thereafter.
 
Erod said:
So did the media, which was in full Hillary celebration mode about 6 pm EST on election day. The gloom and doom that slowly set in was glorious to behold. They bitched about the polls for weeks thereafter.
Click to expand...

Further proof that the only ideology you subscribe to is "I like anything that pisses off liberals." Duly noted.
 
Kobie said:
Further proof that the only ideology you subscribe to is "I like anything that pisses off liberals." Duly noted.
Click to expand...

Watching "objective" journalists stare blankly into space in utter despair was yummy.
 
Erod said:
Watching "objective" journalists stare blankly into space in utter despair was yummy.
Click to expand...

The Politics of Spite.

"Let's elect a megalomaniac. That'll show those jer-na-lists!"
 
Fearandloathing said:
no good.

You are stooping to the liberal tactic, so hated not so long ago, of 'what about Bush"? The last I looked this woman is no where near the reigns of power and never likely to be again.
Click to expand...

However she is grooming her brain washed offspring Chelsea for a career in politics. The Clinton crime family has no intention of riding off into the sunset. And while as a Canadian, you had no skin in the game of American politics, those of us who live and work here and not brain washed by the left, are just relieved that Hillary did not win. The damage that she would have done would have taken decades to repair.

Deal with the reality of today: a commander in chief who is on record with not a few, but hundreds of lies is challenging the findings of the intelligence arm of his own government. That is far, far more dangerous to everyone than a tired, worn out old hag whose influence has evaporated.
Click to expand...

No matter how much the canard of hundreds of Trump lies is pushed, only the Trump haters are taking it seriously. When mere misstatements are added to an alleged lie tally, the charge "He lied" loses all meaning....much like the overused liberal charge of racism. The definitions are broadened to the point where nobody listens.

No more 'what about Bush' horse****, especially after calling out the left for the same ****ing practice not so long ago. It looks desperate.
Click to expand...

Bush had the class to ride off into the sunset when he left office. Most US presidents do. Hillary has not ridden off into the sunset and is still mouthing off. When the Clinton clan gets the hell out of politics and gets on with their personal lives, I will be delighted to avoid mentioning them.
 
haymarket said:
We have always had people who vote against their own economic self interest and those patterns simply alter over time and election. The answer is education and information so that people understand to not vote against themselves as it is harmful to them in the long run.

Dear White America: Your working class is literally dying?and this is your idea of an answer? - Salon.com

Forbes Welcome

James Carville: Why do people vote against their interests? | TheHill

Evidence Reveals That Voting Against One's Economic Self-Interest May Be Hazardous To One's Health | The Huffington Post
Click to expand...


That is part of your party's problem. You are disconnected with actual constituents. You are attempting to decide for them what is in their interests. That's the biggest single reason Hillary got her "wide load" backside defeated in coal country.
 
Kobie said:
The Politics of Spite.

"Let's elect a megalomaniac. That'll show those jer-na-lists!"
Click to expand...

It beats electing a crook like Hillary with mental health issues.
 
ObamacareFail said:
It beats electing a crook like Hillary with mental health issues.
Click to expand...

It looks like there are people who think Trump has "mental health issues"

The Trump Psych Debate: Is It Wrong To Say He's Mentally Ill?

Is Donald Trump mentally unwell, and if so, should anything be done about it? If you’re psychologist John Gartner, the answer to that question is such a resounding “yes” that the obvious response is an online petition summoning your colleagues to demand Trump's removal from office.

Gartner, who spent 20 years at Johns Hopkins and now practices privately, has accrued more than 25,000 signatures on his petition, which addresses U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Whether or not any, all or most of the signatories are indeed mental health professionals has not been confirmed.
(. . .)
We’ve had lots of presidents with mental health issues that “wouldn’t disqualify and might even enhance” their ability to perform their duties, he said. But, he added, the Trump situation is “from a psychiatric point of view the absolute worst-case scenario … if I were to take the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and try to create a Frankenstein’s monster of the most dangerous and destructive leader and had freedom to create any combination of diagnosis and symptoms,” Trump would be the result.
Click to expand...
 
ObamacareFail said:
That is part of your party's problem. You are disconnected with actual constituents. You are attempting to decide for them what is in their interests. That's the biggest single reason Hillary got her "wide load" backside defeated in coal country.
Click to expand...

The numbers say you are wrong as nearly 2.9 million more Americans voted for the presidential candidate of my party.
 
Somerville said:
It looks like there are people who think Trump has "mental health issues"
Click to expand...

Well, sport, opinions are one thing. Facts are another. There is no doubt whatsoever that Hillary has mental health issues:

 
haymarket said:
The numbers say you are wrong as nearly 2.9 million more Americans voted for the presidential candidate of my party.
Click to expand...

No, actually not. You are still failing to accept emotionally that we elect presidents by the electoral college....not the popular vote. Hillary lost because she could not when where she needed to win. it is as simple as that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom