- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 24,697
- Reaction score
- 24,061
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
https://theintercept.com/2017/02/15...-defenders-suddenly-care-about-wiretap-abuse/
What's the republican position of the week on national security? I'm in a daze trying to keep up.
Edward Snowden's a traitor for exposing the massive surveillance state...
But, now we see outrage when it's turned against them..
Hey Rush Limbaugh, what's our position on wiretaps again? Okay.. Yep, Conditional on who they're wiretapping. If they're listening to someone with Muhammad in their name it's okay. But, if it's a Mike, we're against.. okay.. got it.
The surveillance-touting Wall Street Journal in an editorial Monday dropped its usual use of the term “intelligence professionals” to question whether “U.S. spooks” had a court order to listen to Flynn’s conversations.
What’s particularly ironic about Nunes’s comments was that he seemed to be ignoring one of the biggest gaps in U.S. surveillance law – one which he has personally defended — that allows the government to spy on millions of Americans without any sort of probable cause by targeting their communications with people overseas.
What's the republican position of the week on national security? I'm in a daze trying to keep up.
Edward Snowden's a traitor for exposing the massive surveillance state...
But, now we see outrage when it's turned against them..
Hey Rush Limbaugh, what's our position on wiretaps again? Okay.. Yep, Conditional on who they're wiretapping. If they're listening to someone with Muhammad in their name it's okay. But, if it's a Mike, we're against.. okay.. got it.