• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Idaho judge sentences 19-year-old man to celibacy

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
TWIN FALLS, ID --
An Idaho judge has ordered a 19-year-old man not to have sex with anyone before he marries as part of his sentencing for statutory rape of a 14-year-old girl.

Judge Randy Stoker sentenced Cody Duane Scott Herrera of Twin Falls to five to 15 years in prison, but he suspended the sentence for a one-year rider program. If the unmarried Herrera completes the program, he'll be released on probation, which requires celibacy unless he weds. Herrera received the sentence in 5th District Court.

The big issue here, according to judges and lawyers, is whether or not forced celibacy violates the convicted man's Constitutional rights. But that is not the way I see it. The issue should be that a judge gave a rapist and child molester freedom, when that punk should be serving time. That judge is not qualified to sit on the bench. Period.

Seriously, I fervently hope the man appeals his sentence and wins, because that means the original sentence of 5-15 years in prison would be restored, and then he can have plenty of sex.... From Bubba the Butt Bandit.

Idaho judge sentences 19-year-old man to celibacy | abc13.com
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

The big issue here, according to judges and lawyers, is whether or not forced celibacy violates the convicted man's Constitutional rights. But that is not the way I see it. The issue should be that a judge gave a rapist and child molester freedom, when that punk should be serving time. That judge is not qualified to sit on the bench. Period.

Seriously, I fervently hope the man appeals his sentence and wins, because that means the original sentence of 5-15 years in prison would be restored, and then he can have plenty of sex.... From Bubba the Butt Bandit.

Idaho judge sentences 19-year-old man to celibacy | abc13.com

...how is something like this enforced? Male chastity belt?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

The big issue here, according to judges and lawyers, is whether or not forced celibacy violates the convicted man's Constitutional rights. But that is not the way I see it. The issue should be that a judge gave a rapist and child molester freedom, when that punk should be serving time. That judge is not qualified to sit on the bench. Period.

Seriously, I fervently hope the man appeals his sentence and wins, because that means the original sentence of 5-15 years in prison would be restored, and then he can have plenty of sex.... From Bubba the Butt Bandit.

Idaho judge sentences 19-year-old man to celibacy | abc13.com

Wait you are calling consensual sex between a 19 year old and a 14 year old rape and child molestation?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

The big issue here, according to judges and lawyers, is whether or not forced celibacy violates the convicted man's Constitutional rights. But that is not the way I see it. The issue should be that a judge gave a rapist and child molester freedom, when that punk should be serving time. That judge is not qualified to sit on the bench. Period.

Seriously, I fervently hope the man appeals his sentence and wins, because that means the original sentence of 5-15 years in prison would be restored, and then he can have plenty of sex.... From Bubba the Butt Bandit.

Idaho judge sentences 19-year-old man to celibacy | abc13.com

I know this is going to be an unpopular opinion but I'm not sure how I feel about calling someone with a five year age gap, and who is also a teenager, a child molester for having consensual sex with another, younger, teenager.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Wait you are calling consensual sex between a 19 year old and a 14 year old rape and child molestation?

Read the article. He bragged during his probation interview about dozens of girls he was able to convince to have sex with him. He might be 19, but he is a sexual predator. And 14 years old is not consensual, according to the law. This asshole is a rapist and molester, and should serve time as a rapist and molester.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

How about we not use rape and stationary rape interchangeably. Rape depends on lack of consent, while stationary rape depends on the age of the "victim".

Anyway, this ruling exposes a serious problem towards the rights of men in this country. If the government did this to a woman they would never get away with it without protests from feminists, but doing the same to a man gets approval from men. Sigh.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Read the article. He might be 19, but he is a sexual predator. And 14 years old is not consensual, according to the law. This asshole is a rapist.

Jesus. You realize that consent is not dependent on some law, right? The law can't change the fact that someone actually CONSENTED to an act being done to them, but only determine that their consent is not important to the law. In short, consent comes from the individual, not from law.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Jesus. You realize that consent is not dependent on some law, right? The law can't change the fact that someone actually CONSENTED to an act being done to them, but only determine that their consent is not important to the law.

Someone who is only 14 years old, and hasn't matured mentally enough to give consent. Glad to see that you support molestation.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Someone who is only 14 years old, and hasn't matured mentally enough to give consent. Glad to see that you support molestation.

Unless we are talking about a baby or something you should refrain from suggesting that the capability of consent is not possible. There is a difference between they can't understand something and they can't consent. Of course, the law fudges this and uses the two like they are same thing.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Unless we are talking about a baby or something you should refrain from suggesting that the capability of consent is not possible. There is a difference between they can't understand something and they can't consent. Of course, the law fudges this and uses the two like they are same thing.

Then you would be OK with it if a 40 old man came to her and she consented to sex? I'm thinking Ted Nugent here. :mrgreen:
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Then you would be OK with it if a 40 old man came to her and she consented to sex? I'm thinking Ted Nugent here. :mrgreen:

Ted Nugent is sixty-eight, not forty. Anyway, nothing you said affects things at all. There is a difference between lack of understanding and lack of consent. The idea that it is not possible to consent to things you don't understand is based on a false understanding of how consent works.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Ted Nugent is sixty-eight, not forty. Anyway, nothing you said affects things at all. There is a difference between lack of understanding and lack of consent. The idea that it is not possible to consent to things you don't understand is based on a false understanding of how consent works.

He was almost 40 when he had sex with a 12 year old girl, Courtney Love. You OK with that?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Someone who is only 14 years old, and hasn't matured mentally enough to give consent. Glad to see that you support molestation.

These dudes will justify anything. Remember that they put a sexual predator in the White House. What do you expect?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

These dudes will justify anything. Remember that they put a sexual predator in the White House. What do you expect?

Donald Trump is not a sexual predator. How ridiculous to bring politics into this thread. What is wrong with you?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Donald Trump is not a sexual predator. How ridiculous to bring politics into this thread. What is wrong with you?

You should be asking yourself that question. What's wrong with you that you would be an apologist for a self-admitted sexual predator?
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Donald Trump is not a sexual predator. How ridiculous to bring politics into this thread. What is wrong with you?

Actually, I thought he was talking about Bill Clinton. :mrgreen:
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Ted Nugent is sixty-eight, not forty. Anyway, nothing you said affects things at all. There is a difference between lack of understanding and lack of consent. The idea that it is not possible to consent to things you don't understand is based on a false understanding of how consent works.

Henrin, I understand your thought process here. But I think it we change the parameters a bit, it will be clearer to you what age of consent means and how important it is in the eyes of the law.

Imagine the girl is NOT 14. Imagine she is five years old.

IMO, although the law in this state considers 14 below the age of consent, I personally don't think it should be bright red. So one could argue the age but not the principle... in my opinion.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Wait you are calling consensual sex between a 19 year old and a 14 year old rape and child molestation?

Legally, yes it is. There is something called 'Statutory rape'. Look it up.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

You should be asking yourself that question. What's wrong with you that you would be an apologist for a self-admitted sexual predator?

He is not a self-admitted sexual predator. Disgusting.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

He is not a self-admitted sexual predator. Disgusting.

I agree.
The constant revisionism of those suggesting Trump did not mean it when he bragged about sexually assaulting women is indeed disgusting! And loathsome. One might even say deplorable.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

These dudes will justify anything. Remember that they put a sexual predator in the White House. What do you expect?

I wasn't justifying or not justifying anything. What I was doing was correcting a misconception about how consent works and why understanding a situation and consenting to a situation are not the same thing.
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

Someone who is only 14 years old, and hasn't matured mentally enough to give consent. Glad to see that you support molestation.
:lamo

As opposed to a 17 year old who hasn't mentally matured enough? They both weren't.


He was almost 40 when he had sex with a 12 year old girl, Courtney Love. You OK with that?
40? No, that is just you showing an irrational bias.

Of course you believe Courtney Love. :lamo
 
Re: http://abc13.com/news/idaho-judge-sentences-man-to-celibacy/1739020/

I agree.
The constant revisionism of those suggesting Trump did not mean it when he bragged about sexually assaulting women is indeed disgusting! And loathsome. One might even say deplorable.

You are the one involved in revisionism.
He did not admit to any such thing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom