• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Muslim Inmates Win Lawsuit, Force System to Accommodate Them

CaptainCourtesy said:
As I said in another post... this is a completely separate issue.
Click to expand...

Fine. I say you are wrong.
But I guess since you are a moderator, your beliefs are superior to mine. Nice tolerance to diversity there.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
NO prisoners should be afforded these accommodations.
Click to expand...

Should is irrelevant concerning the issue we are discussing. The reality is that prisoners ARE afforded these accommodations and due to that, the settlement that is described in the OP, occurred.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
Fine. I say you are wrong.
Click to expand...

You saying I'm wrong is irrelevant since I am not. Current reality is that prisoners are afforded this accommodation, hence the settlement. You not liking that is meaningless to reality.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
Fine. I say you are wrong.
But I guess since you are a moderator, your beliefs are superior to mine. Nice tolerance to diversity there.
Click to expand...

My beliefs are superior to yours in this case simply because they are. I understand that you don't like that, but it is completely accurate. Reality demonstrates that you are wrong. If you want to discuss what you WANT to be the rule/law, be my guest in another thread. It's irrelevant, here. THERE your beliefs have the same value as anyone elses.

And my status as a Mod is irrelevant. You bringing it up is weak.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
You saying I'm wrong is irrelevant since I am not. Current reality is that prisoners are afforded this accommodation, hence the settlement. You not liking that is meaningless to reality.
Click to expand...

While that may be true, I am saying it is wrong and must be changed before it gets further out of hand and costs the taxpayers even more.
It's madness

This is a discussion of ALL sides of the issue...discussing what the alternatives should be is part of that discussion

CaptainCourtesy said:
My beliefs are superior to yours in this case simply because they are.
Click to expand...
So you say....
 
Last edited:
NoLeftNoRight said:
While that may be true, I am saying it is wrong and must be changed before it gets further out of hand and costs the taxpayers even more.
It's madness
Click to expand...

So... why don't you start a thread on the topic? It's certainly an interesting one. And if you are going to, remember to include accommodations for ALL religions in your argument... for consistency's sake of course.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
So... why don't you start a thread on the topic? It's certainly an interesting one. And if you are going to, remember to include accommodations for ALL religions in your argument... for consistency's sake of course.
Click to expand...

Stop with the sarcasm already.
I already stated that this should be applied equally regardless of religion.

The last Potus apparently felt strongly for prisoners rights......I do hope the current Potus changes that.
I'm reading more on prisoner's rights so I can have a better handle on what's what, but that won't change my belief that accommodation of prisoners is a big mistake for society.
 
NoLeftNoRight said:
Stop with the sarcasm already.
I already stated that this should be applied equally regardless of religion.
Click to expand...

Good, I'm glad you feel that way. Not everyone does I imagine... or doesn't think about it until it's pointed out. Then, for some, cognitive dissonance sets in.
 
truthatallcost said:
And you're fine with CAIR collecting a monetary sum from Michigan? The Council on American Islamic Relations, which has had ties to terror groups, was paid off by the government here.
Click to expand...

THAT, I do not like. CAIR are an Anti-American organization. Zero government funding to them (if they get any...it's not like I keep tabs on that p.o.s. organization).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom