• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tom Price as Department of Health and Human Service

Winston

Give me convenience or give me death
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Messages
24,693
Reaction score
24,052
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
You should oppose Tom Price as head of the department and human services because he's an abominable, corrupt politician. Tom Price is the antithesis of the reasons I hear Trump supporters say they support Trump. But, Trump doesn't care about corruption. He chose Tom Price to lead the DHHS not despite his corruption, Trump chose him BECAUSE of his corruption.

Tom Price is guilty of pushing through legislation benefiting a company he invested in, days before.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/139901/tom-price-perfect-representative-trumpian-corruption

“Rep. Tom Price last year purchased shares in a medical device manufacturer days before introducing legislation that would have directly benefited the company.... Price bought between $1,001 to $15,000 worth of shares last March in Zimmer Biomet, according to House records reviewed by CNN. Less than a week after the transaction, the Georgia Republican congressman introduced the HIP Act, legislation that would have delayed until 2018 a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulation that industry analysts warned would significantly hurt Zimmer Biomet financially once fully implemented.

Tom Price is also in favor of converting Medicare to a voucher system and turning Medicaid into a block grant program. Which would be devastating to low income families. This pick is classic republican preference for higher income earners and tough **** if you aren't so lucky.
 
Back
Top Bottom