• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: It's 'Disgraceful' for Pope to Question My Christianity [W:9]

I don't know about disgraceful but Trump is right in regards that nobody on this earth has the power to judge whether he is Christian or not. I'm very curious to see if at least 3 poster will post in this thread. 3 posters come to mind that I know are trump supporters and I have seen them tell others quite a few times that they are Christians. :)

Regardless though the fact remains that nobody on this earth has the power to make that call.
 
I don't demand countries take in economic migrants and embrace multiculturalism. I say any country has a right to preserve it's culture and freedoms. Letting in economic immigrants from culturally opposite areas does the opposite of this.

So in some way, I haven't set a standard. I say any country can do as it pleases but it is not "racist" or "xenophobic" to refuse these people. The Pope says countries SHOULD take in more migrants because...?

He does this, of course, with only taking in a few families to the Vatican. Any area of the world that has taken in a significant amount of refugees has seen wild complications and problems, which is why he's smart enough to not do it.

No, I'm saying your standard for "significant amount of refugees" is arbitrary. You've decided the Pope is hypocritical because he hasn't taken in "enough" people, but you're the one deciding what "enough" is. I have a feeling if they'd taken in ten times the current number, you'd still say exactly the same thing.

As for the Pope's motivations, uhh, seriously? Is that not abundantly clear? I feel like there's a book somewhere that really spells this out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom