- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 31,057
- Reaction score
- 3,969
- Location
- not here
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
In Rand's book, the gifted abandon society and set up a Utopian little society apart from the greater society they have left. However, their goal is not to bring down society. That would very likely be the result, but not their intent. Their motivations seem to be without greed or malice. They seek only their own, personal happiness. Galt is one who has watched the genius creators of the world tortured and abused by the industrialists and governmental types and noted the unhappiness that results for the genius creators as a result.
You seem to see that as well. Your conclusion is that the torture and abuse is both justified and noble. You disagree with Rand in this. With me as well.
You seem to be in possession of the knowledge that men are intrinsically different from one another. You have chosen to use the Nazi-reminiscent word "Übermensch". I don't recall that word being used in "Atlas Shrugged". Could you link to the passage in which it appears?
Putting that aside, Rand is pretty clear that people are controlled by others not so much through the strength of the controllers as through the weakness of the controlled. This is evident in all of the characterizations of control throughout the novel.
The real battle in this book is not about the struggle of the individual against the society as you seem to be saying, but rather about the individual against his or her own fears.
Does the industrialist need to control his business segment to be happy or only need to see his revolutionizing, better steel come to existence?
Does the architect need to be revered by his peers or only build the best structures in the most efficient way?
Can the individual chose honesty in revealing her inner thoughts and actual actions or must she hide the reviled to avoid being shamed by society?
Inner strength and happiness vs. the accolades of society. We all make these choices daily in much smaller ways than Rearden, Galt or the Taggerts.
Can a person be happy in accomplishment without recognition? Can a person be happy in recognition absent accomplishment?
Sadly, our society seems to revere those who are recognized for little. We seem to love the heat and don't much care about the light. Wesley Mouch would be happy in our world today. He would undoubtedly work for the Democrat National Committee.
The “gifted” go on strike: a collectivist concept that only works en masse. That is a huge contradiction built into Rand’s story first of all; and I have never suggested that it was done in order to damage society. Rand is trying to make a point, that social and economic growth will become stagnant without the free flow of unimpeded ideas and personal growth. And again, the trouble with that concept, on a social level, is that in reality, it cannot operate as a singularity. Even as a utopia, the ideas and the “gifted” are stagnant in and of themselves without “second hands” to carry them out.
As for the Übermensch, Fredrick Nietzsche died in 1900; long before WWI OR Hitler. It was his sister Elizabeth who introduced the idea to regime as she felt that the concept fit the pure Aryan as an ideal.
The “overman” was Nietzsche’s idea of the man who rose above all restrictions and guilt through religion to introduce man in his true nature: that’s about as succinctly as I can put it. Thus the Übermensch has nothing whatsoever to do with the third Reich OR the Aryan.
The Übermensch is a philosophical man who is outside of social constraints, thus the combined characters of Rearden, Galt and Dagney Taggart, as uber capitalists who defy social relaities in order to prove a point. That behavior, and “you’re fired”, coupled with Trump’s ego define the self- realized capitalist Übermensch which is Atlas Shrugged.
And the weakness of the controlled is a good point and it serves meat to the wolves who are the controllers. Having said that however, “the controlled” are a great part of civil society through human history, and Rand’s ideal of the capitalist utopia of the United States is not an exception to that rule. The difference is, only in the US can the capitalist consider him or herself as the Übermensch, with the socially permissive means to realize that. Yet it is vital to remember, as reality dictates that seeing yourself as an overman and expecting others to treat you like one are two completely different realities, that latter of which borders on delusion and feudalism. Rand’s book is fine as an ideal, but delusional as a reality: a social system simply cannot afford it and the Third Reich AND Rome bear that out very clearly.
End part 1
Last edited: