• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

From Woman to Woman

tosca1 said:
"I am not a "disgrace to women" because I don't support the women's march.
I do not feel I am a "second class citizen" because I am a woman. I do not feel my voice is "not heard" because I am a woman. I do not feel I am not provided opportunities in this life or in America because I am a woman. I do not feel that I "don't have control of my body or choices" because I am a woman. I do not feel like I am " not respected or undermined" because I am a woman.

I AM a woman.
I can make my own choices.
I can speak and be heard.
I can VOTE.
I can work if I want.

Full content can be viewed at this link

Female Pens POWERFUL Letter that DESTROYS Women's March Participants | Conservative Byte

I second it. And to echo Ann Coulter....

At least Trump had achieved in a day, what Michelle had been trying to do for 8 years! So many lard asses got off the couch and finally did their work-out! :lol:
Click to expand...


rrrroar....

 
I hate the title of the article. Nobody DESTROYED anybody. They're just having a disagreement. Jeeze talk about sensational...

Not to mention, you and the article are missing the point. The whole point of feminism isn't that women have to be a certain way or hold certain opinions, it's that you can be whoever or whatever you want to be. Feminism holds space for conservative women.

But what you're not getting is that your whole privilege to not partake yet remain safe in your freedom has been built upon the blood, sweat and tears of people like the very protestors that you decry and "destroy" with your entitled partisan rhetoric.

All the luxury you have to blab your opinion about how pathetic protestors is, ironically, a result of activism. Your freedom to "be you" is kept in check by people who do the work to ensure that the State doesn't overstep its bounds, even while you are busy insulting them.

tosca1 said:
"I am not a "disgrace to women" because I don't support the women's march.
I do not feel I am a "second class citizen" because I am a woman. I do not feel my voice is "not heard" because I am a woman. I do not feel I am not provided opportunities in this life or in America because I am a woman. I do not feel that I "don't have control of my body or choices" because I am a woman. I do not feel like I am " not respected or undermined" because I am a woman.

I AM a woman.
I can make my own choices.
I can speak and be heard.
I can VOTE.
I can work if I want.

Full content can be viewed at this link

Female Pens POWERFUL Letter that DESTROYS Women's March Participants | Conservative Byte

I second it. And to echo Ann Coulter....

At least Trump had achieved in a day, what Michelle had been trying to do for 8 years! So many lard asses got off the couch and finally did their work-out! :lol:
Click to expand...
 
Paperview said:
Dick is a euphemism, cupcake.
Click to expand...


Dick is a slang for penis, sweetpea.





It could also be used to describe a guy who brags of sexual assault, walking in on naked women and girls at pageants, and who says things like: sure, no problem, you can call my daughter Ivanka a piece of ass.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't that be a "prick?" Or, a "dickhead?"
 
Last edited:
Diving Mullah said:
It is wonderful that you have all these choices, many women have given their lives for you to have all that right.
Click to expand...

Not all choices. A lot of choices I've done on my own - after all, I've been blessed to live in a society that allows me to do so.

Life is an endless series of choices. Everything has a consequence.
If women can only manage to hold on to that thought, there wouldn't be as many abortions - and repeat abortions.




The problem is that President Trump basically want to grab your ***** without your consent, and believes you have no rights let alone simple right to privacy, throw you in the house lock the door and have just pop babies and cook dinner and when you got old dump your ass for new models.
Click to expand...

This is where you just lumped yourself with a bunch of mindless women.
You're repeating the most parrotted cliche' - which only proves that you have not really think things through. Go look up the transcript of that private conversation - it's been taken out of context, and used as propaganda to feed to the sheeples.




If agree with that, then good luck, if you don't like that then you should have been in the march. But you missed the boat on that one.

I hope you have good puss grabbing blocker! Diving Mullah
Click to expand...

I hope you develop a mind of your own.
Critical thinking - it's the best tool a woman can have. People are out there to exploit you - even your own kind.

Don't be dazzled by posturing actors - acting is their forte!
LISTEN to what they say and analyze it - you'll see they're simply acting. :lol:

Don't perpetuate the myth that women can't think for themselves. Nor, can they discern. Women have been given brains for a reason. Use it.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Dragonfly View Post
How many women has Trump been married to? How many kids with how many different women?
Click to expand...

Are you attacking all people who got divorced and remarried? Are you saying laws do not apply to all?
No wonder you don't see anything wrong with abortion - you don't seem to think rights and justice is for everyone. You seem to endorse a double standard.


See, why liberals are dangerous?
Liberal-minded and so-called "progressives," should never be given power!
 
Were I a woman, I would NEVER vote for a candidate that did not promise to IMMEDIATELY bring in a law that makes it illegal to pay women less than men for the same job.

If the reverse was true, as a man, I would not vote for a candidate unless they made equal pay for equal work a law.

And forget the Equal Pay Act of 1963...it is not nearly binding enough or complete enough. It is little more then an appeasement Act. Basically, an Act that men can say to women 'see, what are you complaining about. You have equal pay laws'.


Why do women put up with that crap? I never would.

Neither Clinton nor Trump made any huge promise about it.

And when I say promise? I mean 'promise that if it I do not get the law through within 1 year, that I will immediately resign as POTUS'.


Ladies - either you start demanding your candidates do exactly that or you will NEVER get equal pay for equal work...NEVER.

Why? Because most men like getting paid more than women. They like feeling superior. And they will not give it up willingly. Of course, most men will never admit it publicly. But they are like that.

Most men are far more chauvinistic than they think they are, imo.
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
Your gender symbol is pink. Wear it proud and...biggly.
Click to expand...

That's going against the Feminist movement!


When the women’s liberation movement arrived in the mid-1960s, with its anti-feminine, anti-fashion message, the unisex look became the rage—but completely reversed from the time of young Franklin Roosevelt. Now young girls were dressing in masculine—or at least unfeminine—styles, devoid of gender hints.


Paoletti found that in the 1970s, the Sears, Roebuck catalog pictured no pink toddler clothing for two years.


“One of the ways [feminists] thought that girls were kind of lured into subservient roles as women is through clothing,” says Paoletti.

“ ‘If we dress our girls more like boys and less like frilly little girls . . . they are going to have more options and feel freer to be active.’ ”
Click to expand...

Read more: When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink? | Arts & Culture | Smithsonian
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! Give the gift of Smithsonian



That's why we ended up with neutral colors! Now....they're bringing back the pink!

That's why I'm saying....there is no consistency!
You're perpetuating the myth that we women, are fickle-minded! :lol:
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
rrrroar....

Click to expand...



Roar. Let it all out. :lol:


But it's more preferable not to squander our roaring over trivial matters. Choose your battles. Wisely.

Constant petty roarings will eventually lose its sting. People start rolling their eyes.
We get tuned out! That's what I do with kids having fits - tune them out. :mrgreen:

And please - ban the likes of Ashley Judd from doing the roaring! Looked like she thought she's on SNL! :lamo
 
Last edited:
Northern Light said:
Not to mention, you and the article are missing the point. The whole point of feminism isn't that women have to be a certain way or hold certain opinions, it's that you can be whoever or whatever you want to be.
Click to expand...


Then, what's with all these women wearing the same pink jay-jay ***** hat? :lol:

And the color pink, to boot - of all colors!
 
Originally Posted by Northern Light View Post

Not to mention, you and the article are missing the point. The whole point of feminism isn't that women have to be a certain way or hold certain opinions, it's that you can be whoever or whatever you want to be.
Click to expand...

Huh.

Come to think of it.....these women looked like they all came out an assembly line!
Kinda remind me of the days when that's only what women were good for when they got employment - working in assembly lines!












That's the mentality of all these women! Assembly line-mentality! That's what they project! No originality!


Whoever came up with the brilliant idea of pink jay-jay hats ought to be pinched by every woman! :lol:
 
Last edited:
DA60 said:
Were I a woman, I would NEVER vote for a candidate that did not promise to IMMEDIATELY bring in a law that makes it illegal to pay women less than men for the same job.

If the reverse was true, as a man, I would not vote for a candidate unless they made equal pay for equal work a law.

And forget the Equal Pay Act of 1963...it is not nearly binding enough or complete enough. It is little more then an appeasement Act. Basically, an Act that men can say to women 'see, what are you complaining about. You have equal pay laws'.


Why do women put up with that crap? I never would.

Neither Clinton nor Trump made any huge promise about it.

And when I say promise? I mean 'promise that if it I do not get the law through within 1 year, that I will immediately resign as POTUS'.


Ladies - either you start demanding your candidates do exactly that or you will NEVER get equal pay for equal work...NEVER.

Why? Because most men like getting paid more than women. They like feeling superior. And they will not give it up willingly. Of course, most men will never admit it publicly. But they are like that.

Most men are far more chauvinistic than they think they are, imo.
Click to expand...

That's an area I'll agree with you.

A woman who has the same responsibility, and the same workload of a man should be given equal pay.


Employment, shouldn't be based on genders! It should be by merit!
The one qualified for the job.

If we want equality - then do away with looking at genders!



If women will channel all their energy into one practical goal - they can move mountains.
 
Last edited:
tosca1 said:
Roar. Let it all out. :lol:


But it's more preferable not to squander our roaring over trivial matters. Choose your battles. Wisely.

Constant petty roarings will eventually lose its sting. People start rolling their eyes.
We get tuned out! That's what I do with kids having fits - tune them out. :mrgreen:

And please - ban the likes of Ashley Judd from doing the roaring! Looked like she thought she's on SNL! :lamo
Click to expand...

Ashley Judd...roar... LOL


Sure, women can be petty...but so can men....but women are judged a lot more harshly in the public sphere....especially by other women. I think that some women (and men, too) are far more critical of women and hold them to different standards than they do men....and never was that more apparent than during this last election. So if women haven't made as much progress as they should've by now....then perhaps you're right...they only have other women to blame.
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
Ashley Judd...roar... LOL


Sure, women can be petty...but so can men....but women are judged a lot more harshly in the public sphere....especially by other women. I think that some women (and men, too) are far more critical of women and hold them to different standards than they do men....and never was that more apparent than during this last election. So if women haven't made as much progress as they should've by now....then perhaps you're right...they only have other women to blame.
Click to expand...

Women have rarely been treated equally, only the USA attempts to level the playing field. And what do they get for thanks?
 
calamity said:
But, yet you are offended when women who do not feel like you and that thing calling itself Ann have a protest rally. Hmmm
Click to expand...

Can't speak for Lovebug, but I'm not offended at all. But stop telling me I'm "against" women and a "traitor" because I feel zero need to march or wear a ridiculous p*ssy hat on my head.
 
Groogrux said:
Can't speak for Lovebug, but I'm not offended at all. But stop telling me I'm "against" women and a "traitor" because I feel zero need to march or wear a ridiculous p*ssy hat on my head.
Click to expand...

Who would?

I have a lot pf problems with the organizers of this march, as does my wife. First and foremost we can't get behind some clown in a hijab who dissed Hirsi Ali, by calling her an Islamaphobe, and supports Sharia Law after agreeing to an arranged marriage at age-17. Sorry, but she does not represent women's rights.
 
calamity said:
Who would?

I have a lot pf problems with the organizers of this march, as does my wife. First and foremost we can't get behind some clown in a hijab who dissed Hirsi Ali, by calling her an Islamaphobe, and supports Sharia Law after agreeing to an arranged marriage at age-17. Sorry, but she does not represent women's rights.
Click to expand...

I've seen that rhetoric all over FB and from some of my very close friends.
 
It's disgusting how these women trivialize serious things that should matter.


When are you privileged women of America and Canada marching for Muslim women who - unlike the men who are guilty along with them - are being stoned for adultery?



When are you privileged women of America and Canada marching for Muslim women, who are being blamed for getting raped?



When are you privileged women of America and Canada marching for women who are being gang-raped in India?



Domestic violence? Sexual assaults where perpetrator - thanks to your mindless liberalism - hardly get the sentence that befits their crime?





If you don't want to get mocked, ridiculed and laughed at, for your stupidity - fight for something that truly matters! Hypocritical airheads! You only make it harder for women to be taken seriously. You make me sick.
 
SheWolf said:
Really... Who is a feminist who as all for Clinton cheating on his wife?
Click to expand...

what feminists defended Bill Clinton?

Uh. lots of them? Its' a mere google search :)

Anita Perez Ferguson, president of the National Women's Political Caucus - the premier group promoting female participation in American politics - described Willey's charges as "quantity rather than quality, in terms of my feelings." She continued: "There's no question that it's disturbing... But to come to any judgment now is definitely not something that I think is timely."

With the exception of a few Republicans, women in Congress - including several swept to power by female outrage over the Senate's treatment of Anita Hill - have shown an equal agility of mind. Their excuses range from the procedural stonewall ("What is important for the American people to know is that there is a process in place to deal with these allegations," in the words of Senator Barbara Boxer), to the creative inversion (What about Ken Starr's "humiliation" of the women he dragged before the grand jury? fumed Representative Nancy Pelosi) to the truly fanciful twist on gender politics ("Not so many years ago, a woman couldn't be a White House intern," said a straight-faced Senator Carol Moseley-Braun on Meet the Press).

Feminists have, all along, muffled, disguised, excused and denied the worst aspects of the President's behaviour with women - especially in their reactions to Paula Jones, whose sexual-harassment suit they have greeted with attitudes ranging from tepid boilerplate support to outright hostility....
Click to expand...

They tried to flip some of it on it's head, posing a variety of arguments, ranging from "it's actually kind of cool he's so sexually active" to "pro choice presidents get a free grope". :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom