• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What are the protesters demands? Why are they protesting?

I'm a republican but I would have voted for any number of democrats other than Clinton. Now having said that I'm pleased with the path Trump seems to be on. I can overlook his silly Tweets if he keeps talking care of issues which I support.

Unsurprisingly, I am not pleased with the path Trump is on, haha, so the tweets and antics from KAC and Spicer are just like rubbing salt in a wound. I could bare one or the other probably, but both...ugh. I'll be waiting to see how his ideas and the policies from Congress merge. There's still hope I could actually be rather pleased with this admin even if its grating to watch.
 
I'm a republican but I would have voted for any number of democrats other than Clinton. Now having said that I'm pleased with the path Trump seems to be on. I can overlook his silly Tweets if he keeps talking care of issues which I support.

I totally agree. I would have voted for any honest moderate Democrat over Trump. The left just doesn't understand Trump or why he won and it doesn't have anything to do with his stupid tweets. If they can't figure it out then they have more bad elections in store for them. Tweets have to be ignored and Trump judged on what he actually does. That's what people voted for.
 
isnt hard to figure out why women are protesting the grabber.

And it isn't hard to figure out why these righteous celebrities gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation he simply drugged and raped a 13 year old girl at his pal Jack Nicholson's house . Liberals love to hand out awards to child molesters , rapist and pedophiles and pretend to have morals and values , please ! :roll:
 
And it isn't hard to figure out why these righteous celebrities gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation he simply drugged and raped a 13 year old girl at his pal Jack Nicholson's house . Liberals love to hand out awards to child molesters , rapist and pedophiles and pretend to have morals and values , please ! :roll:


holy crap dude you are really off in the woods on this one. trying to say the protesters were all raping 13 year old girls is just nuts.
 
holy crap dude you are really off in the woods on this one. trying to say the protesters were all raping 13 year old girls is just nuts.

What I said was clear to most . Try reading it again slowly this time . :shock:
 
ok, saying the protestors are child molestors is just nuts.

Once again read it slowly ...........And it isn't hard to figure out why these righteous celebrities gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation he simply drugged and raped a 13 year old girl at his pal Jack Nicholson's house . Liberals love to hand out awards to child molesters , rapist and pedophiles and pretend to have morals and values , please !
IT DOES NOT SAY "protestors are child molesters." THEY GIVE THEM AWARDS , CLEAR ?
 
Once again read it slowly ...........And it isn't hard to figure out why these righteous celebrities gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation he simply drugged and raped a 13 year old girl at his pal Jack Nicholson's house . Liberals love to hand out awards to child molesters , rapist and pedophiles and pretend to have morals and values , please !
IT DOES NOT SAY "protestors are child molesters." THEY GIVE THEM AWARDS , CLEAR ?

The protestors weren't drugging and raping 13 y/o girls.
 
holy crap dude you are really off in the woods on this one. trying to say the protesters were all raping 13 year old girls is just nuts.

You know he didn't say that. Liberals aren't concerned with telling the truth.
 
I am not a woman, but if I were a woman, a person who talks about women the way Trump does would be inherently distasteful to me.

I am not a woman, but if I were a woman, a person who has expressed his intent to punish those who have abortions, and to further restrict abortion access, would be worrying to me.

I am not a woman, but if I were a woman, a person who dismisses or belittles professional women because they are on their periods would be someone I don't trust to take me seriously.

Do you really need more than that? Is that not enough?

Conservatives in this country are notorious for being frightened or incensed into voting against their own best interest. Poor conservative folk will reliably vote against the programs that help them most if you associate it with trashy black people.

Conservatives from the rust belt will reliably vote against workers rights and for big business if you convince them it's really the immigrants who put them out of work.

Conservatives will reliably vote against freedom of speech and other civil liberties if you convince them it's to get the terrorists.

Conservative women will reliable vote for manifestly misogynistic authoritarian males and against their own reproductive flexibility if you convince them that those are the causes of leftist harlots.

What I see in this thread is just more of that.
 
You know he didn't say that. Liberals aren't concerned with telling the truth.

Those heads are slowly exploding and I love every minute . Liberals need more coloring books and safe zones . :lol:
 
Those heads are slowly exploding and I love every minute . Liberals need more coloring books and safe zones . :lol:

They need more safe zones but I'm not so sure about the coloring books. I doubt they can color within the lines because they haven't even mastered connecting the dots yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom