• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day

Orly?

Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
3,906
Reaction score
862
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day | TheHill

Almost one month removed from the election, the channel is more than tripling CNN and MSNBC in total viewers in primetime, with Fox averaging 2.9 million viewers to CNN’s 960,000 and MSNBC’s 959,000, according to Nielsen Research.
In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.

Fox is the only cable news network to increase viewership from before the campaign season ended.


People are seeing right through the liberal agenda MSM..
 
If the data is authentic, then I can only say WOW!!!
 
Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day | TheHill

Almost one month removed from the election, the channel is more than tripling CNN and MSNBC in total viewers in primetime, with Fox averaging 2.9 million viewers to CNN’s 960,000 and MSNBC’s 959,000, according to Nielsen Research.
In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.

Fox is the only cable news network to increase viewership from before the campaign season ended.


People are seeing right through the liberal agenda MSM..

They are all looking for the secret Trump in Fox. Good Luck!
 
So more seniors got brainwashed by FOX then by CNN and MSNBC on election day.

Means little to me.

Seniors get the vast majority of their news from mass media sources...which means the vast majority of seniors are absolutely clueless about the world. And judging by most of the seniors I speak to - that definitely holds true (unfortunately).


The internet is the future for news...TV is dying. And good riddance to it. It was useful once - now it is useless.

If it were not for sports - I would have completely cut the cable years ago.
 
Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day | TheHill

Almost one month removed from the election, the channel is more than tripling CNN and MSNBC in total viewers in primetime, with Fox averaging 2.9 million viewers to CNN’s 960,000 and MSNBC’s 959,000, according to Nielsen Research.
In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.

Fox is the only cable news network to increase viewership from before the campaign season ended.


People are seeing right through the liberal agenda MSM..

Fox is my choice for election news. Also my go-to for national breaking news.

My take-aways this morning are that Trump may be selecting too many military men for his cabinet which may pose a problem for confirmation...two interviews of congressmen on the Left who see it as a problem; President Obama, at a speech yesterday, claimed the strength of ISIS (which for some reason he calls ISIL) was not brought to him in his military briefings-they played his cuts where he said that and played the congressional testimony from three or four different military men who told of ISIS strength building in Syria and the atrocities committed there (2014) and told of Obama calling them "the JV team" at the same time. Then they editorialized that Obama tended to fire those generals who played up ISIS strength. ?

I'm thinking, from this information, that General Petraus is probably out of the running unless Trump appoints him as a sacrificial lamb knowing he won't get through. Might be a good move, actually.

For those on the left who constantly berate the station, I doubt they watch it so the only opinion they have is from gossips. Three times on this website in the past week, I've asked detractors to tell us about specific lies or specific examples of biased reporting. Those claiming same never came back.

We need more critical thinking in this country. In my opinion, of course.
 
So more seniors got brainwashed by FOX then by CNN and MSNBC on election day.

Means little to me.

Seniors get the vast majority of their news from mass media sources...which means the vast majority of seniors are absolutely clueless about the world. And judging by most of the seniors I speak to - that definitely holds true (unfortunately).


The internet is the future for news...TV is dying. And good riddance to it. It was useful once - now it is useless.

If it were not for sports - I would have completely cut the cable years ago.

As proven this election cycle, the internet is the cesspool for news.

IMO, there is no truly qualified source for factual news. Everyone should view whatever information is provided with extreme skepticism.
 
As proven this election cycle, the internet is the cesspool for news.

IMO, there is no truly qualified source for factual news. Everyone should view whatever information is provided with extreme skepticism.

You are (I assume) talking about social media like those pathetic sites like Facebook and twitter.

I am talking about web-based news sources.

Sure, you look at all news sources with skepticism...but all major media sources almost always get it wrong.

There is no point whatsoever, imo, of even watching them in passing. They are worse than useless.
 
You are (I assume) talking about social media like those pathetic sites like Facebook and twitter.

I am talking about web-based news sources.

Sure, you look at all news sources with skepticism...but all major media sources almost always get it wrong.

There is no point whatsoever, imo, of even watching them in passing. They are worse than useless.

I'm referring to all forms of internet news, social media included.

With examples of fraudulent and manipulated "news" from sources like AP, Reuters, HuffPo, Salon, ThinkProgress, DailyKos, NYT, WaPo, etc., etc., it's clear there is no reliable source available to anyone. The same goes for many sources considered to be "right leaning". They aren't reporting, they are pontificating.

A headline should simply be viewed as a stepping off point, from which further research is required, if the news is of interest. Outside of that, such headlines should be taken with a grain of salt.

Unfortunately, this appears to be the way things will have to be until some better way, or better sources, are revealed.
 
I'm referring to all forms of internet news, social media included.

With examples of fraudulent and manipulated "news" from sources like AP, Reuters, HuffPo, Salon, ThinkProgress, DailyKos, NYT, WaPo, etc., etc., it's clear there is no reliable source available to anyone. The same goes for many sources considered to be "right leaning". They aren't reporting, they are pontificating.

A headline should simply be viewed as a stepping off point, from which further research is required, if the news is of interest. Outside of that, such headlines should be taken with a grain of salt.

Unfortunately, this appears to be the way things will have to be until some better way, or better sources, are revealed.

Well, when I was referring to internet news sources, I was not referring to any of those that you listed as most of them are just internet versions of mainstream media sources.

I am talking about independent news sources on the web who have few sponsors. Sure, you have to wade through them and take them all with a grain of salt. But taken together, they can give you a far, FAR better picture of the world than major media sources.

Television news is worse than useless...has been for years. Unfortunately, it is where most middle aged people and the vast majority of seniors get their news from.
 
Well, when I was referring to internet news sources, I was not referring to any of those that you listed as most of them are just internet versions of mainstream media sources.

I am talking about independent news sources on the web who have few sponsors. Sure, you have to wade through them and take them all with a grain of salt. But taken together, they can give you a far, FAR better picture of the world than major media sources.

Television news is worse than useless...has been for years. Unfortunately, it is where most middle aged people and the vast majority of seniors get their news from.

LOL

Yes, everyone knows young connected people are much better informed than anyone else. :roll:
 
Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day | TheHill

Almost one month removed from the election, the channel is more than tripling CNN and MSNBC in total viewers in primetime, with Fox averaging 2.9 million viewers to CNN’s 960,000 and MSNBC’s 959,000, according to Nielsen Research.
In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.

Fox is the only cable news network to increase viewership from before the campaign season ended.


People are seeing right through the liberal agenda MSM..
:lamo

I find it hilarious how people will tout Fox News ratings and then accuse stations like CNN of being "mainstream" media. It's like people have no idea how stupid that is.

But it's not surprising. I suspect the audience of Fox News didn't change all that much during the election season, but the viewership of CNN spiked during the election season. And now that the election is over, and people are less tuned into politics, those casual CNN viewers are watching other things.
 
LOL

Yes, everyone knows young connected people are much better informed than anyone else. :roll:

Oh great!

You have gone from a remotely decent argument to lame sarcasm to make your point - whatever the heck that is.


I have better things to do then waste my time on you over this. Believe what you want - you obviously will believe whatever you are told.

Enjoy your ignorance...it is blissful after all.



We are done here.

Good day.
 
Last edited:
And your proof of this sarcastic statement is what exactly?

My guess is you have none. My guess is you follow these sources I have belittled and resent the implication that you are uninformed (if these are where you get your news from).


I guarantee you that the average under 40 year old is FAR more unformed than the average over 40 year old in America. I cannot prove it...but just look at where the over 40's (especially the over 50's) get their news...the major news media (lol---what a joke they all are).

LOL

I have to agree, there are many people under 40 who are "unformed" (Freudian slip?) Many who might fit that description post on DP often.

Sarcasm aside, I just think its interesting to view evidence of the pseudo-intellectual pedestal young people think they occupy.

You make claims you admit you can't prove, and declarations based on assumptions you can't possibly verify.

I would suggest that doesn't cause the casual observer to view your "we young people are more informed" claims seriously. In fact, they perhaps would cause quite the opposite reaction.
 
Fox News tripling CNN, MSNBC in viewers since Election Day | TheHill

Almost one month removed from the election, the channel is more than tripling CNN and MSNBC in total viewers in primetime, with Fox averaging 2.9 million viewers to CNN’s 960,000 and MSNBC’s 959,000, according to Nielsen Research.
In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.

Fox is the only cable news network to increase viewership from before the campaign season ended.


People are seeing right through the liberal agenda MSM..


any chance you have a reputable source? The Hill certainly is not
 
I haven't watched TV since 2004.

Well, except occasionally in a hotel room or through Netflix. Back then, though, looked at what my cable bill would be, what I was getting in return, what I could buy in books per month instead. Besides, didn't want any longer to be "subtly" or forcefully influenced in ways its obvious that the news/entertainment world were trying to mold the pathway ahead me to travel down. Here,go ahead, sit down,put your feet up, take a load off, let our channel mesmerize you into a trance-like state where they make my own decisions for me.

Instead started more and more to use the internet to scour for the particular information I wanted to know about, rather than sit in front of that TV set and have them spoon feed me.

Only things I truly missed, looking back, were CSPAN and, sometimes, the History Channel. My students were like, how will you live without TV? And yet I found myself far more informed in this manner than most of my fellow teachers, was up on far more news than they or the kids, out ahead of the news cycle curve oftentimes, so much so my students would ask, how do you know that if you don't even watch TV?

Well, the internet IS a great source, with that grain of salt. Especially if you look wherever your search leads you, no matter the source, just having different, several different perspectives of the events to pull from is better than the short shrift TV news gives anything that requires a modicum of actual thought to puzzle. The internet is a blizzard of information necessitating wading through, searching for, panning for those nuggets. If you enjoy gathering information, is truly is like panning for gold, tons of sand and grit, very little gold dust with the occasional nugget.

Worth it all the same.

Its actually why I come to this site as often as I do. The topics often interest me enough to go out and do the necessary homework, put my previous reading and cumulatively gathered knowledge and experience together ...then try to put that into words that kind of make sense here. Maybe if only to me, at times.

Then I can put it out there and people actively and interactively try to pry open the cracks, show me where I am wrong forcing me to hone my arguments, plug the holes or completely question what I was originally thinking. What a wonderful learning tool.

Fox, while it may be marginally better at times as at least hitting some of the stories that the other networks oftentimes have to be forced to acknowledge, I frequently found it too much entertainment oriented, not enough actual hard news reporting, very rarely getting into the details enough for one to form a valid/solid opinion. Talk radio was much better, often dedicating an hour or more to topics with callers able to challenge, bring to bear other perspectives.

Though not the answer either, there is not one source for that anyhow, it was at least better.

I am glad the too oft relied upon sources we had, as a country, grown far too accustomed to trusting showed us this election cycle more of their true selves. Their glaring faults, the collusion, the more self fulfilling prophecy type polling meant to, in my opinion, influence the outcome more than reflect a snap shot of true sentiments of the moment... so that we may learn from this to be alert to those who would try to fool us for their gain... and maybe something new and innovative will rise up out of the manure dumped on us last election cycle.

If we look upon the occasion of this dump of pure **** onto us and instead, as preferable, perhaps view it as necessary fertilizer from heaven, hey, maybe something, something good, might grow out of it?

When things look grim, doors closing down in all our maybe too familiar hallways, I think of the Chinese proverb, when one door closes, another opens.
 
Last edited:
So more seniors got brainwashed by FOX then by CNN and MSNBC on election day.

Means little to me.

Seniors get the vast majority of their news from mass media sources...which means the vast majority of seniors are absolutely clueless about the world. And judging by most of the seniors I speak to - that definitely holds true (unfortunately).


The internet is the future for news...TV is dying. And good riddance to it. It was useful once - now it is useless.

If it were not for sports - I would have completely cut the cable years ago.

In the key 25-54-year-old demographic that advertisers covet most, Fox is beating CNN and MSNBC combined with 1.82 million viewers in the category versus 765,000 for CNN and 559,000 for MSNBC.
 
Sure, you look at all news sources with skepticism...but all major media sources almost always get it wrong.

There is no point whatsoever, imo, of even watching them in passing. They are worse than useless.

Yep, too much agendas, not enough facts..

Fox uses too much agenda too but supports it with facts at a much higher rate than the left agenda msm..
 
Those behind the curtain would also say it is a cesspool of truth..

Indeed. Why else would they have invested $10's, if not $100's, of millions to create the means to disperse their version of it?
 
:lamo

I find it hilarious how people will tout Fox News ratings and then accuse stations like CNN of being "mainstream" media. It's like people have no idea how stupid that is.

But it's not surprising. I suspect the audience of Fox News didn't change all that much during the election season, but the viewership of CNN spiked during the election season. And now that the election is over, and people are less tuned into politics, those casual CNN viewers are watching other things.

CNN has been outed as a leftist propaganda outlet not above using lies to promote their agenda, so they are losing viewership.. FOX not so much..
 
Wake me up when they, or any cable news outfit, have good programming.
 
I haven't watched TV since 2004.

Well, except occasionally in a hotel room or through Netflix. Back then, though, looked at what my cable bill would be, what I was getting in return, what I could buy in books per month instead. Besides, didn't want any longer to be "subtly" or forcefully influenced in ways its obvious that the news/entertainment world were trying to mold the pathway ahead me to travel down. Here,go ahead, sit down,put your feet up, take a load off, let our channel mesmerize you into a trance-like state where they make my own decisions for me.

Instead started more and more to use the internet to scour for the particular information I wanted to know about, rather than sit in front of that TV set and have them spoon feed me.

Only things I truly missed, looking back, were CSPAN and, sometimes, the History Channel. My students were like, how will you live without TV? And yet I found myself far more informed in this manner than most of my fellow teachers, was up on far more news than they or the kids, out ahead of the news cycle curve oftentimes, so much so my students would ask, how do you know that if you don't even watch TV?

Well, the internet IS a great source, with that grain of salt. Especially if you look wherever your search leads you, no matter the source, just having different, several different perspectives of the events to pull from is better than the short shrift TV news gives anything that requires a modicum of actual thought to puzzle. The internet is a blizzard of information necessitating wading through, searching for, panning for those nuggets. If you enjoy gathering information, is truly is like panning for gold, tons of sand and grit, very little gold dust with the occasional nugget.

Worth it all the same.

Its actually why I come to this site as often as I do. The topics often interest me enough to go out and do the necessary homework, put my previous reading and cumulatively gathered knowledge and experience together ...then try to put that into words that kind of make sense here. Maybe if only to me, at times.

Then I can put it out there and people actively and interactively try to pry open the cracks, show me where I am wrong forcing me to hone my arguments, plug the holes or completely question what I was originally thinking. What a wonderful learning tool.

Fox, while it may be marginally better at times as at least hitting some of the stories that the other networks oftentimes have to be forced to acknowledge, I frequently found it too much entertainment oriented, not enough actual hard news reporting, very rarely getting into the details enough for one to form a valid/solid opinion. Talk radio was much better, often dedicating an hour or more to topics with callers able to challenge, bring to bear other perspectives.

Though not the answer either, there is not one source for that anyhow, it was at least better.

I am glad the too oft relied upon sources we had, as a country, grown far too accustomed to trusting showed us this election cycle more of their true selves. Their glaring faults, the collusion, the more self fulfilling prophecy type polling meant to, in my opinion, influence the outcome more than reflect a snap shot of true sentiments of the moment... so that we may learn from this to be alert to those who would try to fool us for their gain... and maybe something new and innovative will rise up out of the manure dumped on us last election cycle.

If we look upon the occasion of this dump of pure **** onto us and instead, as preferable, perhaps view it as necessary fertilizer from heaven, hey, maybe something, something good, might grow out of it?

When things look grim, doors closing down in all our maybe too familiar hallways, I think of the Chinese proverb, when one door closes, another opens.

I turned my cable TV off a year or so ago too in favor of extraordinary internet service..

America would be better off if more people followed this example..
 
Wake me up when they, or any cable news outfit, have good programming.

Sure, I'm willing to throw FOX under the bus if disavowing MSM includes the liberal propaganda fake news trying to proclaim everyone else fake news..
 
Sure, I'm willing to throw FOX under the bus if disavowing MSM includes the liberal propaganda fake news trying to proclaim everyone else fake news..

I watch C-SPAN, PBS News Hour, and have had to go to Youtube to get updated analysis from think tanks and advocacy coalitions like the Bipartisan Policy Center, AEI, the Hoover Institution, Brookings Institution, Stratfor, and the Thomas Fordham Institute.
 
Back
Top Bottom