• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What about a recount?

truthatallcost said:
After months of saying that Donald Trump would be a sore loser, you are now all appearing to be sore losers.
Click to expand...

I never said anything of the sort. Not on these boards, and not in daily life, either. Anyway, I'm not sure what about my post reeks of "sore loser." I said I don't see any reason for a recount, and don't think one would change anything. The only way I could take the OP seriously was to treat it as a hypothetical, and responded accordingly.
 
It is best for Anerica not to contest the election results, the country is divided enough as it is with out dragging it out. The choke queen could not complete the deal. For those of us that despise Cry Baby, a more productive effort would be to let your Senator, and Congressman know specifically which of Cry Babys policies you find deplorable. Best we use the energy to gear up for 2018, and flip some seats, as did the GOP in 2010.
 
PIPEWRENCH said:
I love this.
The people who swear we do not need ID because there is no voter fraud in this country are now claiming voter fraud because they lost.
It just doesn't get any better than this.
Talk about eating crow.
Click to expand...

I think the word is "hypocrisy"...they just take it exponentially higher ;)
 
Any successful attempt to change the outcome of the election is going result in a bad outcome.

The right will view this as a coup. That would probably touch off protests that would be met with protests....which would escalate to violence....which could be the start of widespread civil disorder.

At least half of America will not accept any change to this election.
 
gdgyva said:
My problem is stuff like this is keeping people out there from accepting the fact that Trump is our next president

As long as crap like this keeps flowing, people will keep hoping that their savior Hillary will somehow be anointed

It isn't going to happen....there is no proof of fraud....and these type of stories are fanning the flames

We have riots, marches, protests.....we need to get that crap stopped and get back to our lives

As long as there is an iota of hope, and crackpot stories and theories like this, that just won't happen

Understand? I hope so....:peace
Click to expand...

That makes sense to a point but I have a feeling that it's not going to pan out and people are not going to get on with their lives, even after Trump is sworn in. I predict a significant likelihood that the swearing in ceremony will be attacked with high amounts of mob violence and that it will continue.
 
independentusa said:
Clinton is meeting with those who feel that there has been some real voter fraud taken place in at least three staates, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. If these three states went to Clinton as they were expected to do, then the results of the election would change AN example in one country in Wisconsin there were 31,000 ballets but the vote total showed 34000. There are questions why there is a 7% difference between electronic voting machines and the other methodes of voting. A difference larger than it should be and those are the machines that can be both hacked and the vote totals changed. Should there be a recount? If there is a recount and Clinton wins should she be the president elect or do you think it is tooo late in the game? Finally, will the GOP try and stop a recount either in court or physically like they did in Florida in the 2000 election?
Click to expand...

Do you have a link that substantiates that part I highlighted? The reason I ask is that everything I've seen didn't say anything about a meeting...I read there was some sort of conference call.

Or...do you consider a conference call to be a meeting?

In any case, there are other threads here about this and I think the consensus is that there is no "there" there. In other words, nothing is going to come of this.

What do you think? In fact, why don't you answer your own questions?
 
truthatallcost said:
After months of saying that Donald Trump would be a sore loser, you are now all appearing to be sore losers. :doh
Click to expand...

LOL! After months of Trump screaming, "THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!!!" you turn a blind and stupid eye towards even the smallest of potential adjustments.

You think upholding the sanctity of our democracy and the integrity of our elections is being a 'sore loser'

Delicious irony
 
Last edited:
truthatallcost said:
After months of saying that Donald Trump would be a sore loser, you are now all appearing to be sore losers. :doh
Click to expand...

Actually, I would let it be. I'm just saying that you never see the right complain about "rampant voter fraud" when they win the election. As if that election must be clean.

Tell me. Do you think there was rampant fraud in the Presidential election? Or is that only when a Democrat wins?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! After months of Trump screaming, "THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!!!" you turn a blind and stupid eye towards even the smallest of potential adjustments.

You think upholding the sanctity of our democracy and the integrity of our elections is being a 'sore loser'

Delicious irony
Click to expand...

Look, it's perfectly clear. A Republican won, so obviously there was no fraud. There is only fraud if a Democrat wins. Duh....
 
independentusa said:
Clinton is meeting with those who feel that there has been some real voter fraud taken place in at least three staates, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. If these three states went to Clinton as they were expected to do, then the results of the election would change AN example in one country in Wisconsin there were 31,000 ballets but the vote total showed 34000. There are questions why there is a 7% difference between electronic voting machines and the other methodes of voting. A difference larger than it should be and those are the machines that can be both hacked and the vote totals changed. Should there be a recount? If there is a recount and Clinton wins should she be the president elect or do you think it is tooo late in the game? Finally, will the GOP try and stop a recount either in court or physically like they did in Florida in the 2000 election?
Click to expand...

So far I have not seen one credible source that verifies that there is any significant problem with the process or the vote count anywhere. Until I do, I will consider that this is pure fabrication to fan the flames and justify the behavior of those who are rioting, looting, burning, terrorizing etc. and those who intend to do their damndest to make Trump fail for no other reason than they can say that he failed.
 
AlbqOwl said:
So far I have not seen one credible source that verifies that there is any significant problem with the process or the vote count anywhere. Until I do, I will consider that this is pure fabrication to fan the flames and justify the behavior of those who are rioting, looting, burning, terrorizing etc. and those who intend to do their damndest to make Trump fail for no other reason than they can say that he failed.
Click to expand...

I don't think there's much of anything to see either. Notice how nobody from the right thinks there was any fraud in this one. It's almost as if...
 
TobyOne said:
Voter fraud does exist and it is now patriotic to criticize a president. The left has suddenly seen the light. I wonder why?
Click to expand...

So if there was fraud...

And we'll check in with you about criticizing the President in a year or so. I have a feeling your thoughts will change.
 
rocket88 said:
I don't think there's much of anything to see either. Notice how nobody from the right thinks there was any fraud in this one. It's almost as if...
Click to expand...

Oh I think there was plenty of fraud. Maybe even enough to give Hillary the popular vote that she might not have otherwise gotten. But it doesn't matter. The candidates went after the electoral college vote, not the popular vote. If there is evidence of fraud from a credible source, it should be exposed. So far no credible source has commented on this other than to say that so far there is no evidence of fraud or rigging, and I rather doubt the Clintons would want a really close scrutiny in the blue states that went red this time. I could be wrong.
 
rocket88 said:
Neither do I. But either there's rampant fraud or there isn't. You can't just say "Well the system wasn't rigged" because your guy won.

There was just as much fraud this time as last time. It's just that the Republican fraudsters were more successful.
Click to expand...

I didn't have a "guy" this time. I don't think fraud has been a problem at the presidential level since the death of Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley.
 
Jack Hays said:
I didn't have a "guy" this time. I don't think fraud has been a problem at the presidential level since the death of Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley.
Click to expand...

The "your guy" was more geared at the Trumpeteers who are now suddenly claiming there was no fraud.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
LOL! After months of Trump screaming, "THE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!!!" you turn a blind and stupid eye towards even the smallest of potential adjustments.

You think upholding the sanctity of our democracy and the integrity of our elections is being a 'sore loser'

Delicious irony
Click to expand...

Maybe some voter ID is in order after all. Of course it would most likely hurt the majority of voters without ID. Such as around 40 million law breaking people here illegally.
 
rocket88 said:
Actually, I would let it be. I'm just saying that you never see the right complain about "rampant voter fraud" when they win the election. As if that election must be clean.

Tell me. Do you think there was rampant fraud in the Presidential election? Or is that only when a Democrat wins?
Click to expand...

I'm fine with finally getting to the bottom of the voter fraud issue. Just don't complain if an impartial investigation finds that more votes are cast fraudulently every election for Democratic candidates, as most of us suspect.

While were at it, let's get those Voter ID laws passed nationally, to protect against voter fraud in the future. Deal?
 
PIPEWRENCH said:
Maybe some voter ID is in order after all. Of course it would most likely hurt the majority of voters without ID. Such as around 40 million law breaking people here illegally.
Click to expand...

They will be legal soon, once Cry Baby offers them amnesty. Its cheaper then the billions it will cost to deport, and we all know how the Big Weeper hates to spend money, unless of course that money comes from the Trump Foundation.
 
PIPEWRENCH said:
They are the ones who believe there are no losers and everybody gets a trophy people. They have never learned to accept reality.
Click to expand...

LOL

20150806_part.jpg
 
yankintx said:
They will be legal soon, once Cry Baby offers them amnesty. Its cheaper then the billions it will cost to deport, and we all know how the Big Weeper hates to spend money, unless of course that money comes from the Trump Foundation.
Click to expand...

Maybe he will put them to work building the wall. Anyone caught illegally entering our country goes on the chain gang and spends a year building the wall.
Oh. I don't want some concrete wall but a nice looking wall such as the Great Wall in China. A nice stone wall with great big towers for the search lights and machine guns.


towers and walls.jpg
 
independentusa said:
Clinton is meeting with those who feel that there has been some real voter fraud taken place in at least three staates, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. If these three states went to Clinton as they were expected to do, then the results of the election would change AN example in one country in Wisconsin there were 31,000 ballets but the vote total showed 34000. There are questions why there is a 7% difference between electronic voting machines and the other methodes of voting. A difference larger than it should be and those are the machines that can be both hacked and the vote totals changed. Should there be a recount? If there is a recount and Clinton wins should she be the president elect or do you think it is tooo late in the game? Finally, will the GOP try and stop a recount either in court or physically like they did in Florida in the 2000 election?
Click to expand...

No. She lost. Butthurt Hillary supporters need to get the **** over it.
 
yankintx said:
They will be legal soon, once Cry Baby offers them amnesty. Its cheaper then the billions it will cost to deport, and we all know how the Big Weeper hates to spend money, unless of course that money comes from the Trump Foundation.
Click to expand...

we dont need to deport them all only the criminals, we can make the others self deport by denying them access to our nation, by making it very costly for business to hire them by taking away there tax i.d. and fining them.

no job?... then they have to leave because they cant make a living.
 
truthatallcost said:
I'm fine with finally getting to the bottom of the voter fraud issue. Just don't complain if an impartial investigation finds that more votes are cast fraudulently every election for Democratic candidates, as most of us suspect.

While were at it, let's get those Voter ID laws passed nationally, to protect against voter fraud in the future. Deal?
Click to expand...

Pass all the ID laws you want. It would only prevent a very minute amount of what the parties do.

The fact that you think none of it is ever the Republican party is just as bad as all the Dems screaming about ID. It's why we can't fix it. A large proportion of the population has been brainwashed by one or the other party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom