Look at the average of all test takers presented in the OP.
Pretty much really close to the center.
Most people who seek out and take a version of the Libertarian Political Compass test will be a little bit lower and to the left .. just as the average indicates.
But if everyone took the quiz, my guess is the average would be a lot closer to the center than even this example presents.
And that's not because everyone's equally polarized to a wing that cancels out in the center.
It's because most people simply are centrist.
And that's sad.
It's sad, not because they are centrist, as that is a good thing, not being controlled by a preconceived political ideology.
It's sad because most of the candidates we're fed are either left wing, right wing, or a combination of the two (libertarian or justician).
If the great majority is centrist, shouldn't we have centrist representation in government?
By the way, you can always tell when it's a libertarian test -- they erroneously place "authoritarian" in opposition with "libertarian" on the top and bottom of the graph respectively.
Authoritarian is not the opposite of libertarian, but libertarians like to think of themselves as "better" in this way.
The yet uncoined term "justician" is the opposite of "libertarian".
Libertarian is based on "liberty", which itself is based on the broader concept of "freedom".
Thus, the political spectrum opposite of "freedom" being the broad concept "security", we look to the logical next level term related to "security" that isn't as broad but politically relevant: "justice".
And so, "justician".
The reason "justician" isn't coined yet and "libertarian" is coined is because "libertarian" is a male-dominated philosophy, and, by definition of terms opposites, would mean that "justician" would appeal to females a lot more than it would appeal to males .. and women have yet to come into their natural own politically.
