• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Presidential Debate #4 ..........

TheGoverness said:
An objectively false statement.

Nobody respects women more than TRUMP.

If you say you have more respect for women than Trump, you's a damn lie!
Click to expand...

But really, women are Losers. Great freinds of mine, but total losers.
 
jonny5 said:
Questions for both:

Do you beleive that the national debt should be paid off in your childs lifetime, and how would you do so?
Click to expand...

Funny you should bring this up. Clinton has attacked Donald Trump a few times for independent analysis showing that his economic plan would add 10-20 trillion dollars to the national debt while at the same time bragging that those very analysis show her plan would only add 4 trillion dollars to the national debt and yet she has come out recently, including in the recent debate, that she would not add one penny to the debt. I'm not sure how she rationalizes all that and I'm not sure how on January 20th that the deficit will just disappear overnight.
 
Harry Guerrilla said:
You didn't get the memo?
If you insult a woman and/or some woman, you hate and/or think all women are inferior.
Click to expand...

So women should be treated differently than men simply because of their gender? I'm confused.
 
Moderate Right said:
Funny you should bring this up. Clinton has attacked Donald Trump a few times for independent analysis showing that his economic plan would add 10-20 trillion dollars to the national debt while at the same time bragging that those very analysis show her plan would only add 4 trillion dollars to the national debt and yet she has come out recently, including in the recent debate, that she would not add one penny to the debt. I'm not sure how she rationalizes all that and I'm not sure how on January 20th that the deficit will just disappear overnight.
Click to expand...

Its called saying what people want to hear. We know Clinton wants to raise taxes and spend more. I dont see how that will result in less debt. We dont really know what Trump will do.
 
Crovax said:
To both Trump and Hillary

Obama said, "elections have consequences" and ran a divisive presidency. How would you work across the aisle after you become president and what areas of policy do you think you can pass if the opposition controls congress?
Click to expand...


there was no divisive Obama, you made that up....more right wing bubble
 
TheGoverness said:
Questions for Trump:

1. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

2. How many licks would it take me to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop?
Click to expand...

1. I know Chuck. Chuck is a good friend. We have a good relationship. Even Chuck thinks Crooked Hillary is against the very chuckers that made this country strong.

2.Wrong. The center of the tootsie pop is inconsequential. I am the center of the universe.
 
katzgar said:
there was no divisive Obama, you made that up....more right wing bubble
Click to expand...

There is much proof that Obama is derisive. The Republicans have been in charge of congress for about six years now. Please list all of the Republican policy ideas that he would have signed into law. How about nominating a conservative for the Supreme court to replace Scalia? It is either Obama's way or the highway. He is the head of the party of no.
 
Moderate Right said:
There is much proof that Obama is derisive. The Republicans have been in charge of congress for about six years now. Please list all of the Republican policy ideas that he would have signed into law. How about nominating a conservative for the Supreme court to replace Scalia? It is either Obama's way or the highway. He is the head of the party of no.
Click to expand...


none zerp proof, just right wing fake reality
 
katzgar said:
none zerp proof, just right wing fake reality
Click to expand...

I see you didn't even try to adress my questions. I don't blame you though because you couldn't. All you could muster up is your left wing fake reality.
 
Moderate Right said:
I see you didn't even try to adress my questions. I don't blame you though because you couldn't. All you could muster up is your left wing fake reality.
Click to expand...


reread my statement again. this time for comprehension. I now see why you have so much problem with reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom