• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exposed - Democrats’ Effort to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

Lutherf said:
The sad thing is that what was shown in the video isn't exactly earth shaking news. It ties a number of things together and puts a few names on the record but if people didn't already figure this stuff was going on they simply haven't been paying attention.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it was no big surprise, most normal decent people already know leftists are slimy and will sell their own mother to advance their globalism/statism.
 
Excon said:
Your belief in this has absolutely nothing to do with what they were recorded admitting.

That is why it doesn't fly.
Click to expand...
His fabrications are a matter of court records and from multiple news sources, it is anything but a "belief".
 
Excon said:
Yes, Derp applies to you.
You are again making something up to believe.
You quoted me at 07:11, 07:06 PM according to my time and they do not appear, just as the other ones from 6:06 pm back do not appear on this quote page of mine.
Click to expand...
Your time was recorded in your first screen grab in post 40 showing 5:56 to 4:53, you can't even lie convincingly.

And guess what, the rest of my posts won't show, because I'm not including yer quote tag. I haven't used em since post 45....DERP
 
Gimmesometruth said:
His fabrications are a matter of court records and from multiple news sources, it is anything but a "belief".
Click to expand...
And again.

Your belief in this has absolutely nothing to do with what they were recorded admitting.​

Your continued deflecting from this just says you know you have no valid argument, or do you really not understand what was admitted?


Gimmesometruth said:
Your time was recorded in your first screen grab in post 40 showing 5:56 to 4:53, you can't even lie convincingly.
Click to expand...
So you again choose to make something up again because you have no clue as to what you speak. iLOL
Yes, that image contains two indications that I was quoted at 4:53 and 4:54. iLOL And?
The second image contained even more notices as there were more recent notifications. Did you not understands that? I cut the image off at the 5:00 mark. And?
Do you really not know how notifications get listed?

You also apparently didn't get the reason for the second image, it was to show that what you made up to believe the first time around simply wasn't true.


Gimmesometruth said:
And guess what, the rest of my posts won't show, because I'm not including yer quote tag. I haven't used em since post 45....DERP
Click to expand...
Hilarious.
Here is another image, it shows that they are indeed there, @11:05 and 11:13, just showing again you like making things up to believe.
Derp? Indeed! iLOL

Gimsumtru%20_005.jpg

Stop making things up to believe.
 
Excon said:
So you again fail at refuting what was presented.
Doesn't that figure. So typical. iLOL

They were recorded claiming responsibility for specifics. And you want to sit there and claim manipulation and lies? iLOL
Click to expand...

Nothing to refute.. the man behind the video is a lying piece of ****.
 
Watched the video. Was another attempt to muddy waters and make something out of nothing. Here's a hint, when it takes 16 min of jumping around like a squirrel on red bull to make a point, you ain't got no valid point. This was edited to make something out of nothing. Kinda of like the whole Benghazi mud flinging.

Take a look at the difference of "There might have be foul play by democrats, which Hillary might have been aware of!!!!" vs "Look at what these trump supporters at his rallies are saying about assassination and secession."
 
PeteEU said:
Yes, the right.. OKeefe did it all the time. He has zero credibility.
Click to expand...

Just pointing out that you fauxrage is rather one sided, at least when it comes to deceptively edited video.
 
eohrnberger said:
Just pointing out that you fauxrage is rather one sided, at least when it comes to deceptively edited video.
Click to expand...

I have not seen any "deceptively" edited videos on the "other side" that actually changed the out come to the total opposite.. but please enlighten me.

But I did CNN did a Fox News a few days ago by having a poll add up to 110%... not many comments on that one yet.
 
PeteEU said:
I have not seen any "deceptively" edited videos on the "other side" that actually changed the out come to the total opposite.. but please enlighten me.
Click to expand...
Links previously posted.
PeteEU said:
But I did CNN did a Fox News a few days ago by having a poll add up to 110%... not many comments on that one yet.
Click to expand...

I'm inclined to believe that's just an Oops moment.
 
And again.Your belief in this has absolutely nothing to do with what they were recorded admitting.
Your continued deflecting from this just says you know you have no valid argument, or do you really not understand what was admitted?
Click to expand...
Again, it is not a belief that OKeefe has a long history of producing fully edited fraudulent videos and audio, it is in court records where he had to pay $100K for his fraudulent videos, it is documented in hot mic accidents where he did not hang-up after misrepresenting himself in phone calls.


So you again choose to make something up again because you have no clue as to what you speak. iLOLYes, that image contains two indications that I was quoted at 4:53 and 4:54. iLOL And?The second image contained even more notices as there were more recent notifications. Did you not understands that? I cut the image off at the 5:00 mark. And? Do you really not know how notifications get listed?You also apparently didn't get the reason for the second image, it was to show that what you made up to believe the first time around simply wasn't true.Hilarious. Here is another image, it shows that they are indeed there, @11:05 and 11:13, just showing again you like making things up to believe.
Derp? Indeed! iLOLStop making things up to believe.
Click to expand...
You already admitted that even for you, you have had quote manipulation happening, so even though I applaud your ability to manipulate the quote system, even you do not fully understand it:

You quoted me at 07:11, 07:06 PM according to my time and they do not appear
and

Btw, as you can see your recent quotes do not show up on this quote page of mine and I do not care either.


I have completely eliminated all quote tags, if this shows up on your wqm page, then you will be shown to be a photoshop faker too.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Am I required to? His reputation precedes him.

"Democrats play dirty politics.....whaaa!"


Grow the f up.
Click to expand...

No. It's Democrats caught on video admitting to violating fed. election laws. Parties which are forbidden by fed. election laws to work together are being shown to be very much working together. If you have no problem with this, then you are the problem. The attitude of ignoring the law when it benefits "your side" is at the core of what is wrong with American politics. We should ALL be stepping up and DEMANDING that our elected officials ACROSS BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE follow the law and when they don't, they get thrown out of office with no benefits, no chance at working in gov't at any level and expressly forbidden to work as a lobbyist. Instead of excusing the behavior, you should be demanding someone's head on a stick (figuratively speaking of course).
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Again, the idea that only one party engages in black ops is cool story, brah....but yer not red pilling anyone. The problem is the reputation of the author, his credibility, the whole truth and his history of not producing it. It is always about the degree of believably. Are you going to argue it is all true?
Click to expand...

So step up to the line and show us the Rep. parties that are violating the law. Let's thrown them ALL in jail!! But your approach is "Everyone is doing it, so we should just ignore it."
 
Dogger807 said:
Watched the video. Was another attempt to muddy waters and make something out of nothing. Here's a hint, when it takes 16 min of jumping around like a squirrel on red bull to make a point, you ain't got no valid point. This was edited to make something out of nothing. Kinda of like the whole Benghazi mud flinging.
Click to expand...
iLOL
Riiiiiiiiiiiight!
That is why one guy was fired (Foval), and the other supposedly resigned (Creamer).
 
Gimmesometruth said:
And again.Your belief in this has absolutely nothing to do with what they were recorded admitting.
Your continued deflecting from this just says you know you have no valid argument, or do you really not understand what was admitted?
Click to expand...
Again, it is not a belief that OKeefe has a long history of producing fully edited fraudulent videos and audio, it is in court records where he had to pay $100K for his fraudulent videos, it is documented in hot mic accidents where he did not hang-up after misrepresenting himself in phone calls.
Click to expand...
Apparently you do not know how to discern.
And again, their admittance on video has nothing to do with you absurdly dismissing. That you can not discern the difference is the problem here.

And after one was fired (Foval), and the other supposedly resigned (Creamer), you have no valid argument as O'Keffe's reporting lead to that.

It seems you do not understand that you simply do not get to dismiss things based on the messenger.
While I agree a messenger may be a reason to be suspicious, it is not a reason to dismiss. What matter is the content of the message, and in this case we know it lead to at least one termination and a supposed resignation.


Gimmesometruth said:
You already admitted that even for you, you have had quote manipulation happening,
Click to expand...
Oh Gawd! No. Stop making things up to believe. Do you really not understand that is what you are doing?
What I did was acknowledge that some of your quotes of me did not show up. Unlike you, I did not make up a reason for this occurrence. Do you really not understand the difference?


Gimmesometruth said:
so even though I applaud your ability to manipulate the quote system,
Click to expand...
There you go making something up to believe again.
Do you really not understand that your continued insistence to do so does not speak well of rational thought?


Gimmesometruth said:
even you do not fully understand it:
Click to expand...
Said the person who clearly has shown they do not understand it.


Gimmesometruth said:
I have completely eliminated all quote tags,
Click to expand...
All quote tags? iLOL No you didn't. You put what I said in quote tags twice above. What you have done is eliminated any tags that would notify me.
That is all.
And as I am not dependent on such notification as you suggest you are, it doesn't matter to me nor am I going to go cry about it. iLOL


Gimmesometruth said:
if this shows up on your wqm page, then you will be shown to be a photoshop faker too.
Click to expand...
Hilarious.
Why in the world would something without tags that would notify me, notify me?
But way to go directly to a made up belief. Photoshop? There has been no photoshopping going on.


Stop making things up to believe.
 
volsrock said:
This confirms that Democrats sent trained thugs to assault Trump supporters and disrupt Trump rallies.

When the the democrats lost their slaves, they became a terrorist party ever since.

They embraced unions because union thugs are terrorists, such as Emma Goldman’s battle over a steel company. Four dead and several injured if I recall. Not to mention her speech incited a man to assassinate President McKinley.

Trump is up against the biggest, most dangerous corrupt political machine this nation ever had to endure.
Click to expand...

Your orange messiah was a registered Democrat three times, and was one as recently as 2008.
 
faithful_servant said:
So step up to the line and show us the Rep. parties that are violating the law. Let's thrown them ALL in jail!! But your approach is "Everyone is doing it, so we should just ignore it."
Click to expand...
I didn't know that fantasizing, let alone actually counter-protesting at rallies was "violating the law". Care to cite the actions and what "law" was violated?
 
Excon said:
All quote tags? iLOL No you didn't. You put what I said in quote tags twice above. What you have done is eliminated any tags that would notify me.
Click to expand...
Good grief, now you can't even understand the difference between a quote tag (the code that notifies) and putting text in a quote box, they are not the same thing, this is just another example of your inability to communicate accurately and intelligently.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Good grief, now you can't even understand the difference between a quote tag (the code that notifies) and putting text in a quote box, they are not the same thing, this is just another example of your inability to communicate accurately and intelligently.
Click to expand...
Good grief is right!
1. I have repeatedly shown you have no clue as to what you speak.
2. I have repeatedly shown that I do indeed know the subject far better than you. Had I not known, I would not have been able to point out where you have been repeatedly been wrong. Duh!
In the case of this above reply you had been shown to be wrong again as you said, "I have completely eliminated all quote tags," when you clearly had not.
Had you meant only those which would notify me as I had to point out in reply, you would have stated so in your post, you didn't. That is your fault and your problem.


All you are doing now is trying to deflect away from being wrong as you always do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom