• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Women Love Guys Like Donald Trump!

Many women do wait, especially if they were young, teenagers, when it happened and it was someone who potentially cause hurt or a tuft in their family. Does that mean these women are telling the truth? No. But wait time should not be considered a reason to not believe them. Still should evidence to support their accusations though.

Am I supposed to buy the idea that 7 women waited until the exact same time to come forth, and then magically appear with celebrity lawyers?

Does that not sound planned to you?

voted for McCain too, for basically the same reason. But I see Hillary as the lesser evil here. Trump is an immature asshole who shouldn't be put anywhere close to power over our country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who would be your choice if Trump wasn't in the picture?
 
Lol, you're going to drag this out as long as possible to keep from admitting you're wrong.

Why would researchers formulate 10 different kinds of bad boys? You realize that would confuse the participants of the study?

Because they're are lots of different kinds of "bad boys".

Would you not consider a terrorist a type of "bad boy"? How about a thug who robs stores? A hit man for hire? A drug lord? How many women in those studies would be attracted to those specific bad boys?

I'm not the one unwilling to admit they're wrong here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You guys ripped Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey apart with your talons. Time has proven Bill Clinton to be a sleazebag. Yet in less than a week after allegations surfaced against Trump, you've convicted and condemned him.
Liberals were never exactly a morally sound bunch, but nowadays you guys just appear to have gone full dirtbag.

Your post has nothing to do with the subject of the OP. Trying to change the subject means you've lost the argument.
 
Because they're are lots of different kinds of "bad boys".

Would you not consider a terrorist a type of "bad boy"? How about a thug who robs stores? A hit man for hire? A drug lord? How many women in those studies would be attracted to those specific bad boys?

I'm not the one unwilling to admit they're wrong here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

But you're using an old ploy here to try to defeat the results of the study that you don't like; you're finding fault with how terms were defined. Redress took another approach, and attacked the author.


The researchers followed up that find with a second study in which women interacted directly with male actors who played the roles of sexy cad and reliable dad once during ovulation and again at low fertility. Again, ovulating women thought that the sexy cad — but not the reliable dad — would contribute more to childcare, but only as her partner (not if he shacked up with another woman).

The women that participated in the study were given a choice of male actors. It doesn't say how many actors, or the degree to which the actors portrayed themselves as either a bad boy or nice guy. Maybe you can email Duarte and ask her.
 
But you're using an old ploy here to try to defeat the results of the study that you don't like; you're finding fault with how terms were defined. Redress took another approach, and attacked the author.

The women that participated in the study were given a choice of male actors. It doesn't say how many actors, or the degree to which the actors portrayed themselves as either a bad boy or nice guy. Maybe you can email Duarte and ask her.

I'm using reason and logic. The studies do not specify what type of "bad boy" women find attractive. Whereas you are trying to claim hypocrisy from others by using studies of women that do not fit your premise, particularly since you can't show that Donald Trump meets the type of bad boy they used in the study.

If I said men find women in glasses or older women more attractive, and then said that this means women must be attracted to Amy from Big Bang Theory or must be attracted to HRC, you would most certainly want to see what type of women they used in each of these studies to determine if men really did find women like Amy or HRC attractive, or just certain women in glasses or certain older women.

The fact that they used actors causes an issues. It means they were almost certainly more attractive to begin with than Trump at a base level.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
As a woman, if you were sexually assaulted, would you wait 5, 10, or 20 years to tell anybody?

Again, this shows that you know NOTHING about sexual assault. NOTHING.
 
Personal experience as a man, what women say when they're being honest, the LiveScience article I linked, etc.

Of course nothing is absolute, but generally, a man will have greater luck with women if he embodies the bad boy image, rather than being a nice guy.

“American women love guys like Donald Trump “, for a man to make that kind of claim at a time like this, it is pathetic on so many levels. Sadly, you don’t seem to have a slightest idea how pathetic it is. … Again, one more level
 
Again, this shows that you know NOTHING about sexual assault. NOTHING.

I know enough about politics to know that when 8 women show up simultaneously claiming abuse exactly 1 month before election day, its probably bs. Hillary needed something to overshadow the numerous WikiLeaks emails, and voila!
 
I know enough about politics to know that when 8 women show up simultaneously claiming abuse exactly 1 month before election day, its probably bs. Hillary needed something to overshadow the numerous WikiLeaks emails, and voila!

And yet you STILL know nothing about sexual assault.
 
Back
Top Bottom