• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Loretta Lynch an incompetent, or just another political crook and liar?

TheHammer said:
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?


If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Click to expand...


All of the above.
 
Frank Apisa said:
She is neither.

Oh, the agony of the right! ;)
Click to expand...

Regarding incompetence and crooked liar, you cannot deny that one or the other applies. If she managed to become attorney general based on competence, then she is clearly a crooked liar. Anyone smart enough to pass the bar exam would have worked out that the meeting and chat with Bill Clinton on the tarmac was highly unethical. She knew that. That's why she and Clinton attempted to keep the meeting private.
 
TheHammer said:
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?


If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Click to expand...


Got some links to prove those claims?

Or is this your daily faux outrage
 
MickeyW said:
Absolutely! That's why obama picked her.....



Ohhh ........BS Frank!



Yes indeed.



:lamo



Yes indeed!



See....just another thread where you Can't Handle the Truth!!
Click to expand...

I have no problem handling the truth, Mickey.
 
ObamacareFail said:
Regarding incompetence and crooked liar, you cannot deny that one or the other applies. If she managed to become attorney general based on competence, then she is clearly a crooked liar. Anyone smart enough to pass the bar exam would have worked out that the meeting and chat with Bill Clinton on the tarmac was highly unethical. She knew that. That's why she and Clinton attempted to keep the meeting private.
Click to expand...

You are confused...but I understand.

My opinion is that she is not incompetent.

All humans lie...so to say she does not lie would be absurd. It is my opinion that she does not lie appreciably more than you.
 
Frank Apisa said:
You are confused...but I understand.

My opinion is that she is not incompetent.

All humans lie...so to say she does not lie would be absurd. It is my opinion that she does not lie appreciably more than you.
Click to expand...

Without intending to, you just validated my post. Thank you.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I am not a liberal.

I am an Independent who favors a progressive agenda.
Click to expand...

If you favor a progressive agenda, then you are in fact a liberal.You do not have to be a registered democrat to be a liberal and you do not have to be a registered republican to be a conservative. I am an independant myself, however I am clearly a conservative.
 
ObamacareFail said:
If you favor a progressive agenda, then you are in fact a liberal.You do not have to be a registered democrat to be a liberal and you do not have to be a registered republican to be a conservative. I am an independant myself, however I am clearly a conservative.
Click to expand...

I AM NOT A LIBERAL. I have never used that descriptor for myself...and frankly, I have some negative feelings for people who do.

It is my opinion that Americans who consider themselves to be "conservatives"...consider anyone to the left of them to be "liberals."

I most assuredly am not a liberal.
 
She's obviously just another in the long list of corrupt government officials. They are never held accountable for what they do, so they have reason to change.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I AM NOT A LIBERAL. I have never used that descriptor for myself...and frankly, I have some negative feelings for people who do.

It is my opinion that Americans who consider themselves to be "conservatives"...consider anyone to the left of them to be "liberals."

I most assuredly am not a liberal.
Click to expand...

What difference do you claim between liberal and progressive? The truth is that at some point, many liberals just decided they did not like the term "liberal" and adopted "progressive" to replace the term....without changing anything stance wise.
 
TheHammer said:
Is Loretta Lynch incompetent or is she just another political crook and liar?


If we are to believe that Lynch inadvertently met up with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac and only discussed Clinton’s golf game and their grandchildren in the face of the FBI’s & Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s insecure e-mails and the Clinton’s Foundation operations, then shouldn’t we also believe that Loretta Lynch is either an incompetent for exposing herself to the illegal impropriety or a liar?
Click to expand...

Actually, I think the whole thing was a shrewd, well thought out plan and that we are all being played in a big administration/Clinton game. I bet they even did just talk about grandkids and golf and are thrilled with themselves for seeing us react to it all. I believe that Lynch knows that Clinton will not be charged and wanted to distance herself from the situation for political gain so she meets with slick Willy, let's herself get caught doing it, "recuses" herself from the decision, and then sits back and accepts everyone else's decision not to indict Hillary and she comes out smelling like a rose for not making the decision herself and accepting the FBI's findings to not indict.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I have no problem handling the truth, Mickey.
Click to expand...

Frank Apisa said:
eohrnberger said:
Frank Apisa said:
I do not see them as corrupt as people like Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush. Not nearly as corrupt...if corrupt at all.
Click to expand...

Not corrupt at all? Frank, yes you do have a problem with the truth, because the truth is that the Clintons and Obama are corrupt, and have sucked in Lynch into their corruption.

Frank Apisa said:
And I do not care if you think I am a responsible voter or not.

I AM a responsible voter whether you see me as such or not.
Click to expand...

You yourself said that being a responsible voter means handling the truth, and you've just avoided the truth with your partisan blinders. It's either or. It can't be both.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
ObamacareFail said:
What difference do you claim between liberal and progressive? The truth is that at some point, many liberals just decided they did not like the term "liberal" and adopted "progressive" to replace the term....without changing anything stance wise.
Click to expand...

If you are asking, "Do you support an agenda which protects and expands safety net programs?"...my answer would be, YES! It would be the truth.

If you ask me if I am a liberal...I would say, NO! That also would be the truth.

A label is a label. I speak out against the use of labels whenever possible, because labels can be abused...and can be CONFUSED.

I AM NOT A LIBERAL...and as I said earlier, I often have negative feelings about people who do use that descriptor.
 
eohrnberger said:
Frank Apisa said:
eohrnberger said:
Not corrupt at all? Frank, yes you do have a problem with the truth, because the truth is that the Clintons and Obama are corrupt, and have sucked in Lynch into their corruption.
Click to expand...

I'll stick with what I said:

I do not see them as corrupt as people like Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush. Not nearly as corrupt...if corrupt at all.
Click to expand...

If you think that shows I have a problem handling the truth...think it.

I also have no problem with you being wrong.


You yourself said that being a responsible voter means handling the truth, and you've just avoided the truth with your partisan blinders. It's either or. It can't be both.
Click to expand...

If you think that what I have said shows I have a problem handling the truth...think it, Eo.

I think you are completely wrong...and I think your partisanship and hatred of people like Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch is clouding your thoughts.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Frank Apisa said:
If you are asking, "Do you support an agenda which protects and expands safety net programs?"...my answer would be, YES! It would be the truth.

If you ask me if I am a liberal...I would say, NO! That also would be the truth.

A label is a label. I speak out against the use of labels whenever possible, because labels can be abused...and can be CONFUSED.

I AM NOT A LIBERAL...and as I said earlier, I often have negative feelings about people who do use that descriptor.
Click to expand...

The term "liberal" aptly describes the political views you have posted on this forum. the term progressive is simply a label that liberals embarrased by the term "liberal" adopted back in the late 1980s. The term liberal is not meant to be offensive...it simply describes your political views, which are clearly liberal.. And I still challenge you to come up with an alleged difference.
 
Frank Apisa said:
eohrnberger said:
Frank Apisa said:
I'll stick with what I said:



If you think that shows I have a problem handling the truth...think it.

I also have no problem with you being wrong.




If you think that what I have said shows I have a problem handling the truth...think it, Eo.

I think you are completely wrong...and I think your partisanship and hatred of people like Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch is clouding your thoughts.
Click to expand...

It's not partisanship, Frank, on which I'm basing my rejection of Hillary on. It's based on Hillary's long history of corruption. You seem to have chosen to completely ignore or completely discount that.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Frank Apisa said:
If you are asking, "Do you support an agenda which protects and expands safety net programs?"...my answer would be, YES! It would be the truth.

If you ask me if I am a liberal...I would say, NO! That also would be the truth.

A label is a label. I speak out against the use of labels whenever possible, because labels can be abused...and can be CONFUSED.

I AM NOT A LIBERAL...and as I said earlier, I often have negative feelings about people who do use that descriptor.
Click to expand...

If "you support an agenda which protects and expands safety net programs" then you are a liberal, even if you don't like the term. Notice the definition "protects and expands". I did not say cut back or eliminate. YOU are the one who is confused as to the definition of the word liberal merely because you don't like labels, just as most liberals are against the label "illegals" for those that are here in the country ILLEGALLY. You like to take the worldview that just because the US is not as left as many other countries in the world then you are some sort of centrist, even when you actually believe in the liberal views of those other said countries if you felt they could actually be achieved here in the US. And, you like to call yourself an "independent" just because in the past you have voted for both Democrats and Republicans, even though you have not voted for a Republican in 36 years.
 
ObamacareFail said:
The term "liberal" aptly describes the political views you have posted on this forum. the term progressive is simply a label that liberals embarrased by the term "liberal" adopted back in the late 1980s. The term liberal is not meant to be offensive...it simply describes your political views, which are clearly liberal.. And I still challenge you to come up with an alleged difference.
Click to expand...

I can tell you in absolute honesty...that I AM NOT A LIBERAL.

You are correct that my political and philosophical views are in favor of a progressive agenda.

But I am not a liberal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom