• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunham?

Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

summarize
[suhm-uh-rahyz]
Spell Syllables
Word Origin
verb (used with object), summarized, summarizing.
1.
to make a summary of; state or express in a concise form.

Links please. I'd like to see who her "defenders" are, and where and of them said or implied anything of the sort, or attribute that thinking to Palin. You don't get to make up your own summaries without proof.

Post some evidence to show that Palin thinks Christian pedophiles should be excused. I'll wait.
 
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

Let me guess - you abhor the Duggars, and think Dunham's vulgarity is fine. Okay.

I think they're both wrong. But of course, I never knew of a 7 year old asking her sister to spread her legs for a peek, and I never knew any teenagers who bragged about masturbating with their sisters right there. Maybe this was common where you came from.

You haven't heard about such things because people, especially women, who are honest about such things get attacked. Despite the myths and wishes of some folks, children have plenty of curiosity about sex and get aroused. They used to call it "playing doctor" when multiple kids were involved and it was considered a normal stage of development. There is nothing wrong with kids being curious as long as no one is harmed. They should be taught that there are appropriate times and places for sexual exploration, but should never be made to feel ashamed about being curious or for their feelings of arousal or attraction.

Dunham did not harm anyone. In my opinion, the attacks are more about her openness and honesty about her past rather than the actual acts. I didn't read her book, but I doubt that she was bragging about her childhood experiences. She was probably trying to be honest so that others like her could feel less ashamed or embarrassed. She is breaking the female code of silence about her childhood sexual interests. It appears some women resent that she depicts women as being horny at times, which ruins the old myth that women don't desire sex and only do it to lure men into providing them with support and children. The other, more contemporary myth is that women can enjoy sex, but only in romantic situations with someone they love.

I think Girls is a funny show and I appreciate that she depicts taboo topics in an honest way at times. I like that she is willing to make herself and other women look bad, both visually (her body) and in their sometimes inconsiderate or delusional behavior.

I don't have much of an opinion of the Duggars largely because I have never seen the show. I don't think that having a large number of children is virtuous, it is a bit selfish if you don't adopt. It sounds like the acts of the 14 year old kid were not as harmless as Dunham's acts, and he was a teenager, not seven years old. It is not the type of thing that should be an issue now. I don't think he should be punished for it now that he is an adult. He should have been counseled and watched as a teenager (which may have happened, I don't know), but probably should not have been put into the criminal justice system which tends to do more harm than good (often for the victims also).

Here's a story on why I appreciate honesty about taboos, AKA "vulgarity": When I was in summer camp some kids were teasing another kid about masturbating at night. My friend was there and said "So what? Everybody masturbates, its completely normal. 99% per cent of all men do it. I enjoy it" That completely changed the tone of the conversation and probably saved the teased kid from feeling like a freak for the next several years. In fact, it probably saved all those kids from feeling weird about masturbating.
 
Last edited:
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

Here's a story on why I appreciate honesty about taboos, AKA "vulgarity": When I was in summer camp some kids were teasing another kid about masturbating at night. My friend was there and said "So what? Everybody masturbates, its completely normal. 99% per cent of all men do it. I enjoy it" That completely changed the tone of the conversation and probably saved the teased kid from feeling like a freak for the next several years. In fact, it probably saved all those kids from feeling weird about masturbating.

Correction: 100% of men.
 
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

You haven't heard about such things because people, especially women, who are honest about such things get attacked. Despite the myths and wishes of some folks, children have plenty of curiosity about sex and get aroused. They used to call it "playing doctor" when multiple kids were involved and it was considered a normal stage of development. There is nothing wrong with kids being curious as long as no one is harmed. They should be taught that there are appropriate times and places for sexual exploration, but should never be made to feel ashamed about being curious or for their feelings of arousal or attraction.

Dunham did not harm anyone. In my opinion, the attacks are more about her openness and honesty about her past rather than the actual acts. I didn't read her book, but I doubt that she was bragging about her childhood experiences. She was probably trying to be honest so that others like her could feel less ashamed or embarrassed. She is breaking the female code of silence about her childhood sexual interests. It appears some women resent that she depicts women as being horny at times, which ruins the old myth that women don't desire sex and only do it to lure men into providing them with support and children. The other, more contemporary myth is that women can enjoy sex, but only in romantic situations with someone they love.

I think Girls is a funny show and I appreciate that she depicts taboo topics in an honest way at times. I like that she is willing to make herself and other women look bad, both visually (her body) and in their sometimes inconsiderate or delusional behavior.

I don't have much of an opinion of the Duggars largely because I have never seen the show. I don't think that having a large number of children is virtuous, it is a bit selfish if you don't adopt. It sounds like the acts of the 14 year old kid were not as harmless as Dunham's acts, and he was a teenager, not seven years old. It is not the type of thing that should be an issue now. I don't think he should be punished for it now that he is an adult. He should have been counseled and watched as a teenager (which may have happened, I don't know), but probably should not have been put into the criminal justice system which tends to do more harm than good (often for the victims also).

Here's a story on why I appreciate honesty about taboos, AKA "vulgarity": When I was in summer camp some kids were teasing another kid about masturbating at night. My friend was there and said "So what? Everybody masturbates, its completely normal. 99% per cent of all men do it. I enjoy it" That completely changed the tone of the conversation and probably saved the teased kid from feeling like a freak for the next several years. In fact, it probably saved all those kids from feeling weird about masturbating.

I don't think masturbation is vulgar, and never said that I did. Never implied it, in fact. My view of her being vulgar has zero to do with masturbation. I appreciate your anecdote, though it had nothing to do with my post.

By the way, I'm a female, and never heard of this female code of silence about childhood sexual interests. And in the country I grew up in, there was and is no shame in a female enjoying sex.
 
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

Why did you describe Dunham as vulgar?
 
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

Why did you describe Dunham as vulgar?

You didn't quote me; are you asking me?

I can answer for me. She's vulgar because she is devoid of class. Her words are tasteless. She's crass. She's crude. I find her distasteful. Masturbation has nothing to do with it. Rosie O'Donnell is vulgar, and I have no idea what kind of masturbating she did. I never wondered about it.
 
Re: Sarah Palin - Why does press crucify Josh Duggar for pedophilia but not Lena Dunh

You didn't quote me; are you asking me?

I can answer for me. She's vulgar because she is devoid of class. Her words are tasteless. She's crass. She's crude. I find her distasteful. Masturbation has nothing to do with it. Rosie O'Donnell is vulgar, and I have no idea what kind of masturbating she did. I never wondered about it.

It seems to be about time for you to admit you're grasping at straws.
The Duggar story is big, because it points out the pseudo morality he holds. In other words, the popular show he is on touts him as being very moral, when in the past he did actions that were very immoral. Stated again just for your benefit, hes a ****ing hypocrite.
 
Back
Top Bottom