• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Video: Activist busted after defacing anti-Islam ad in Times Sqare Station

This interview sums up in more ways than one, just how rediculous this womans actions were, and at the same time how pathetic her beliefs are.

Michael Coren and Robert Spencer on 'Mona' who attacked the poster in the NYC subway | MRCTV

"one of OUR afdi" - way to get an unbiased source.

"Aurelian world that the 'left' lives in" - oh please

this video in itself is offensive.

Delusional guys like this are what creates antisemitic sentiments (which I don't have) in the first place.


Regarding violent passages in the Quran, the Bible isn't exactly all flowers and sunshine either.
 
Last edited:
This was an act of vandalism not free speech.
 
"one of OUR afdi" - way to get an unbiased source.

"Aurelian world that the 'left' lives in" - oh please

this video in itself is offensive.

Delusional guys like this are what creates antisemitic sentiments (which I don't have) in the first place.


Regarding violent passages in the Quran, the Bible isn't exactly all flowers and sunshine either.

"Aurelian"?

I think the term was "Orwellian" which means "in the style of Orwell" and refers to similarities between the subject's thought process and certain thought processes Orwell described in his book, 1984.
 
"Aurelian"?

I think the term was "Orwellian" which means "in the style of Orwell" and refers to similarities between the subject's thought process and certain thought processes Orwell described in his book, 1984.

I wonder if anyone reads that book anymore.
 
...ok I can settle for they assaulted each other? Clearly the fatter woman was the one first to engage in physical combat.

Again the first problem is the poster should not be there.
There is a whole lotta dhimmitude going on out there.
 
Her doing this is her exercising her freedom of speech. It may be vandalism, but no freedom of speech violations have occurred here.

Wouldn't the spray paint have to actually, I don't know, SAY SOMETHING for it to be speech? She's obviously not promoting any sort of speech of her own. She's merely trying to muffle the speech of another free citizen. BTW, why is that girl in your avatar trying to lick her peace sign?
 
What a joke. Yeah, destroying property containing the free speech of others isn't an abridgement of free speech. :roll:

No, who in the hell do you think you are to deliberately try to silence the statements of others? Do you really expect to get away with it or magically be "justified" in doing so? Here, let's destroy all propaganda of the left and only call it vandalism. It's NOT like I'm abridging your right to free speech by silencing your voice one poster at a time. What a joke.
 
The woman with the spray paint clearly needs a lesson in how to properly deface public property because she was doing a real craptastic job of it.

Not that I have any experience in that department, I'm just sayin'...
 
Uhhh she is using freedom of speech here. She is no way violating freedom of speech... Its vandalism, sure (i agree with this act of vandalism), but she is using her power of freedom of speech to do this act which just so happens to be vandalism.
 
Uhhh she is using freedom of speech here. She is no way violating freedom of speech... Its vandalism, sure (i agree with this act of vandalism), but she is using her power of freedom of speech to do this act which just so happens to be vandalism.

Your right to free speech ends where someone else's begins. You don't get to vandalize other's property and scream it's free speech. No, if you had common respect and basic human decency you'd put down your little can of spray and put up your OWN sign.

Hey, let's replace spraypaint with fire, arson. What do you think?
 
Your right to free speech ends where someone else's begins. You don't get to vandalize other's property and scream it's free speech. No, if you had common respect and basic human decency you'd put down your little can of spray and put up your OWN sign.

Hey, let's replace spraypaint with fire, arson. What do you think?

This is an act of free speech it absolutely is. Is it vandalism? Absolutely. Is it an act of defiance? Yes. Is it free speech? Yes.
 
This is an act of free speech it absolutely is. Is it vandalism? Absolutely. Is it an act of defiance? Yes. Is it free speech? Yes.

Cool. So if we burn down FOX News and MSNBC it's freedom of speech?

Why should exercising your right to free speech include being a bastard who wants to destroy the free speech of others?
 
Cool. So if we burn down FOX News and MSNBC it's freedom of speech?

Why should exercising your right to free speech include being a bastard who wants to destroy the free speech of others?

Defacing a ad with spray paint=burning down Fox News and MSNBC?
 
Wouldn't the spray paint have to actually, I don't know, SAY SOMETHING for it to be speech? She's obviously not promoting any sort of speech of her own. She's merely trying to muffle the speech of another free citizen. BTW, why is that girl in your avatar trying to lick her peace sign?

Nope.

And that's not a peace sign ;)
 
nope........

No no, stick with what you've been saying. You say it's free speech to destroy the free speech of others. It's free speech to destroy someone else's sign, so it should also be free speech to burn down someone's free speech/propaganda building. They're just objects of free speech, and by destroying/nullifying them you exercise your own free speech, correct?
 
There is a whole lotta dhimmitude going on out there.

Disgruntled teens who want to act out often do so by siding with anything that goes against western values. Since Islamism is the most insidious, totalitarian force in the world today opposing western values, and terrorism is one of the methods by which they advance their agenda, these kids act as willing useful idiots to such in lieu of applying any intelligence by way of analyzing the sort of anti-humanist ideology they are aiding as they do.

Anything that supports the agenda of the Arabs who wish to destroy Israel is just fine with these children INCLUDING the desire for genocide, and the intentional murder of Jews. That is why they support anything that tries to destroy people's ability to object to it, such as this uncivilized woman is trying to do in the video.
 
Wouldn't the spray paint have to actually, I don't know, SAY SOMETHING for it to be speech? She's obviously not promoting any sort of speech of her own. She's merely trying to muffle the speech of another free citizen. BTW, why is that girl in your avatar trying to lick her peace sign?

Isn't that some sort of hand signal for she wants to lick *****?
 
Ya so many Obese Americans these days, can't even tell when some one is fat/chubby. Both woman fall under the "chubby" category and I'd say the one blocking the poster is "fat" (non-obese).

Maybe in anorexic boyish looking model world those women would be consider fat or chubby but in the real world those women are not fat or chubby.
 
Uhhh she is using freedom of speech here. She is no way violating freedom of speech... Its vandalism, sure (i agree with this act of vandalism), but she is using her power of freedom of speech to do this act which just so happens to be vandalism.

She is attempting to silence speech she disagrees with by committing an act of vandalism. Then she has the nerve to proclaim that she is exercising her right to free speech, and therefore shouldn't be arrested.

How can you defend this woman?
 
She is attempting to silence speech she disagrees with by committing an act of vandalism. Then she has the nerve to proclaim that she is exercising her right to free speech, and therefore shouldn't be arrested.

How can you defend this woman?

Socialists typically believe in revolutionary tactics, like destroying property and calling it freedom, to killing people and calling it revolution.

If you don't like someone's sign, make your own. Don't be a child. Don't be a child and mess with other kids' toys.
 
Socialists typically believe in revolutionary tactics, like destroying property and calling it freedom, to killing people and calling it revolution.

If you don't like someone's sign, make your own. Don't be a child. Don't be a child and mess with other kids' toys.

I have tried my best over the years to believe that people at heart are the same, in spite of ideological and political differences. I have always in the past, gone into a discussion believing that we all know what right and wrong is, and that people won't forsake that in the name of politics.

After 12 years of posting on political forums, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that progressivism, socialism and communism requires one to embrace at least some level of dishonesty and support those who engage in bad or unlawful behavior.

Just look at the people on this thread who have attempted to defend or justify that woman's deplorable actions and it will confirm everything I have just said.
 
Back
Top Bottom