The hate speech, that the left most refers is connected to comments Trump made about illegal immigration and illegal immigrants. If you look at the immigration policies, of all other nations of the earth, they all, according to this leftist definition, practice hate speech. All countries do not like uninvited guests who are not accounted for.
Even a citizen of the USA, cannot just walk into Canada, without being invited, even though both countries are very close. If an American decided to ignore the Canadian border and was caught inside Canada and deported, does that mean that all Canadians are hater? If you extrapolate the leftist definition, to all countries and citizens of countries, who practice secure border policies, the left is calling the world, haters. Trump spoke in terms of a global standard of international behavior practiced by all sovereign countries. This was twisted, by the left. They are pro-crime. If you do not like criminals, based on international standards, you are a hater.
The mistake the right makes is accepting any irrational premise from the left, and then argue as though the premise is sound. The better strategy is to attack the premise before it even takes root in the brains of the irrational.
In my experience, dealing with the left is like dealing with an irrational woman, who is playing mood games. She may in a mood and based on that mood, she will speak broad conclusions, without any support data. In her mind, the data crunching, done by her mood, is infallible, and does not have to be defended, You can't argue wth her conclusions, since it does no good, while she is in that mood. Instead you get drawn into her irrationality and will begin to argue, as though the original irrational premise has legs.
For example, she may say I don't think you love me as much, any more; I think Trump is a hater. No proof or line of reason is given as a precursor to this conclusion. All you get is a mood induced and data crunched, bottom line. You know this is not true, since you love the gal, but because she is in one of those moods, you learn that arguing in a rational way does not apply. She wants an emotional drama. Before long you are defending yourself against an accusation that is not true, all in an attempt to restore reason, to an irrational person. It gets to be too much work.
A better approach, which I learned from observing females, would be to do the same thing, as a response. You might say, "you don't love me either, or your would not accuse me of not loving you. I know, this is all about you thinking of cheating, right?" This is an irrational conclusion based on a pretend mood hunch. Women are just as vulnerable to the scam as men since it make no rational sense. This reverse scam will often force the female to provide data and examples, which is the path back to reason.
In an intimate relationships, female led mood games can be very useful to the health of the relationship. They provide a way for women to help their men exercise their emotional natures. A male, who is reasonable all the time, is like a one armed man. The emotional game helps the man exercise his other arm, so he can become more balanced; ambidextrous. It may be uncomfortable, but it is natural and useful to a complete person.
However, in the political sphere, these mood games are manipulative and destructive. Unlike the wife or girlfriend who instinctively induces such games fro the health of her mate, the left has no concern for the emotional well being of members of the right. The right should not, play along as though they think in term of interacting with a wife, even if unctset
Woman's march 2017--the day after Trump was inaugurated. This was going on in every state--for more pictures go to this link and scroll through the pages.
Woman's march pictures | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Woman's march January 20, 2018
4,000 Women Want to Run for Office Since Donald Trump'''s Election | Fortune
Pictures of the normal street protests of Trump.
https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=...D20160412&p=pictures+of+trump+street+protests
On January 19, 2019 the new congess will be seated.
What do you think they'll do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies?--:lamo
You have awoken a sleeping giant by electing Trump. You bought into the Fear & Hate speech and now you own it.