• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'White Lives Don't Matter' says Cambridge Academic

Grooming gangs tend to victimize dozens and sometimes hundreds of children, which the average lone groomer doesn't. Grooming gangs are more of a danger for that reason. But besides that, I didn't lie anyway. The article I based my thread on said that 84% of men convicted of child grooming since 2005 were Asian.

The vast majority of men convicted of grooming young white girls – 84 per cent – are of Asian origin, according to a report to be published this week.

The study by the renowned counter-extremism think-tank Quilliam says that of these, seven in ten are believed to be of Pakistani-Muslim heritage.

Asian gangs have deliberately abused white girls because they hold entrenched racist attitudes towards them as being ‘easy targets’ for sex, according to the report, which is based on the testimonies of convicted Asian men during court hearings.

The study – likely to provoke controversy – is written by two British Pakistani authors, who say they hope it will encourage their community to ‘take responsibility’.


https://www.debatepolitics.com/euro...ex-grooming-cases.html?highlight=84%+grooming

Where was the lie? I stated what was printed online by a news organization.

You posted untrue information time and time again in that thread, it started with the titel:

Muslims are 84% of the child sexual predators in UK sex grooming case

Which was and is BS as:

1. it only talked about grooming gangs
2. there is question as to the validity of the claims in the Quilliam reports
3. EVIDENCE!!!!

And with evidence I mean that Asians who are convicted of sexual offenses against minors are only 4% of all convicted child sex criminals where as VAST majority (upwards of 80%) where white men.

Another piece of evidence was that the sample size which the quilliam used was too small to make general assumptions as it looked mostly at a few high profile cases.

Fact is, that the vast majority of sexual offenders in cases in which minors are the victim, are white offenders. But they either do not work in gangs or their gangs were ignored by the Quilliam report.

What do we know about the ethnicity of people involved in sexual offences against children? - Full Fact


Now back to point 2, the validity of the report, this is a comment about this report:

The report faced fierce criticism from academic researchers. Ella Cockbain, a lecturer in security and crime science, is an expert on child sexual exploitation. She said it “is a case study in bad science: riddled with errors, inconsistencies, a glaring lack of transparency, sweeping claims and gross generalisations unfounded its own ‘data’”.

Using “extensive data mining methods”, Quilliam researchers found 58 cases between 2005 and 2017, leading to 264 convictions for “group-based CSE involving grooming tactics”. There is no information as to where the data comes from, how it was selected or how ethnicity identified. Of the 264, 222 were Asian, hence the figure of 84% of grooming gang offenders being Asian. Just 18 were white.

Critics have pointed out, however, that even a casual media search produces far more white perpetrators of group CSE who seem to have been ignored by Adil and Rafiq. And 58 cases over a period of 12 years seems exceptionally low. As the Quilliam report itself notes, a Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) study found 57 cases of Type 1 offending (in Quilliam’s eyes, the equivalent of grooming gangs) in 2012 alone. Rafiq told me he was unsure about the reasons for the disparity but that it may be a difference between grooming cases and court convictions

We’re told 84% of grooming gangs are Asian. But where’s the evidence? | Kenan Malik | Opinion | The Guardian
 
There's probably already law against comedy in the Netherlands. We must not offend the 3% of Netherlands that is gay, black or jewish!

Well, PROVE IT, you made the assumption or claim, so prove we have a law against comedy to not offend gay/black or Jewish Dutch people.

And only 3% gay/black or Jewish? In what universe do you live? 7.1% of Dutch man are gay or bisexual (4% gay, 3.1% bi) and 5.9% of Dutch women are gay or bi (2.6% gay and 3.3% bisexual).

Also, 515,174 people are from either Suriname or from the Dutch Antilles (in other words, black Dutch people), that is 3% already from the Dutch population. and another 1.3% from African countries (not counting South Africa because that will include many whites). To that is at least and 4.3%..

Add that to the gays/lesbians/bisexuals, you have over 10% already gay/bi/lesbian/black.

We also have 10,371 Israeli's living in the Netherlands and sadly only 0.1% of Dutch people are Jewish. But in total your 3% is a ridiculous number.

Now I will be waiting for your evidence for a law against comedy in the Netherlands, I am afraid I am going to be waiting very long.
 
You
- posted false information about grooming gangs

Wow, 3 lies in one post - that's going some even for you.
Anyway, what was the false bit? That most grooming gangs started on their own community before they started on white girls? What was false about that? You've never even bothered about the white victims except as a way to further your lies and cause.
Be specific - you always run away at this point or obfuscate because you have nothing.

- became irate when I posted about foreign doctors in the UK being unqualified to practice medicine

:lamo Remind me, where these "doctors" prescribing medicine? Operating on patients?

lied about Sadiq Khan's ties to radical Muslim Louis Farrakhan

:lamo Um, I corrected you - you basically thought Sadiq Khan was a part of Nation of Islam. That was the thread where you were excusing the IRA and their bombings of UK soldiers - as well as Trump donating funds to the IRA through their different channels.
Actually - let me ask - do you think a defence lawyer actually has deeper links or ties to the people they represent in court?

Go on. Say you didn't.

Like I said - feel free to post specific proof of me saying things you claim. Post numbers - or do you not know how to use the forum advanced search?

I believe the statistic you're grasping for is; '84% of grooming gang members are Asian', or more succinctly, Pakistani.

British-Pakistani researchers say 84% of grooming gang members are Asian: 'It's very important we talk about it' | The Independent

Wow - finally you get it. Everybody has explained to you that the majority of grooming gangs are Asian origin. Took you 2-3 years to get there but well done.
 
You yourself lied about the Cologne sex assault spree that occurred. You've also lied when you said there was no police cover up. Imagine that, one subversive shilling for another subversive. 'What goes round comes round'.
Quite apart from you lying your head off here once again, let's see if you actually have the cojones to accuse anyone here outright of excusing grooming gangs.

Knowing what you're made of, I guess nobody here is holding their breath though.
 
Nope, those would be the followers of Donald Trump.

Considering that conservatives have been trying to fight history since at least 1865, your comment is rather ironic.

Conservatives have been fighting history since 1865? oh ...this ought to be a great example of leftist darwinism.
Please give us your very best example of conservatives fighting history.
 
Conservatives have been fighting history since 1865? oh ...this ought to be a great example of leftist darwinism.
Please give us your very best example of conservatives fighting history.

For those interested...he never did give an example. He just bailed.
 
Conservatives have been fighting history since 1865? oh ...this ought to be a great example of leftist darwinism.
Please give us your very best example of conservatives fighting history.

The “Lost Cause” was invented by conservatives and perpetuated by conservatives literally up until...today

And considering conservatives hero worship a narcissistic con-man who brags about how he drinks water, your snide little whining about “leftists” is pretty meaningless.
 
The “Lost Cause” was invented by conservatives and perpetuated by conservatives literally up until...today

And considering conservatives hero worship a narcissistic con-man who brags about how he drinks water, your snide little whining about “leftists” is pretty meaningless.

I asked for an example of fighting history but it is a great freudian slip on your part that you equate fighting history and preserving it. That sums up lefties perfectly and confirms my belief in how they actually think. Thanks for this!
 
I asked for an example of fighting history but it is a great freudian slip on your part that you equate fighting history and preserving it. That sums up lefties perfectly and confirms my belief in how they actually think. Thanks for this!

Conservatives have been fighting real history in favor of preserving a lie— the lost cause— since 1865.

The fact that you lot have been wailing about confederate statues coming down says all you really need to know about the Trump cult. “Party of Lincoln” my ass :lamo

Thanks for confirming the fact that Trump supporters aren’t living in the real world though.
 
It's adorable how you think that.

You claimed that I “bailed”.

I very clearly did not.

But hey, on the plus side at least you aren’t as humiliated as all those other cultists trying to cover for Donnie Draft Dodger. Supporting the troops right up until Vlad puts out bounties on them.
 
The President of Algeria said that he expects an apology from France for the colonial past, writes "Le Figaro".
Right... And from apologies to payments - one step.
How about an apology from Algeria for centuries of piracy and the The President of Algeria said that he expects an apology from France for the colonial past, writes Le Figaro.
Correctly. And from apologies to payments - one step. How about an apology from Algeria for centuries of piracy and the europian slaves?
 
Back
Top Bottom