- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 23,838
- Reaction score
- 16,147
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
~ I still think it's probably Italy still ~
Which will still never ever entice me to visit any part of Italy.
Ever.
~ I still think it's probably Italy still ~
Personal bias wants to force me to agree, but I still think it's probably Italy still.
Without which (who) the French would probably still be eating the disgusting slop that Catherine of Medici eradicated.:lol:
Which will still never ever entice me to visit any part of Italy.
Ever.
Why?Which will still never ever entice me to visit any part of Italy.
Ever.
Yeah, Andalucia and the Basque country seem, speaking "cuisine", of different worlds.I was actually going to use Italy, along with Spain.
The cultural diversity from north to south in both countries is really quite astounding.
There were places in the Sicilian backlands where my English started taking on a Marlon Brando tone.:mrgreen:Really?
I love the place, and have visited countless times, although never further south than Terracina.
I always feel like I'm in an old Fellini movie when I sit with my Italian friends in a restaurant or a café lol.
Yeah, Andalucia and the Basque country seem, speaking "cuisine", of different worlds.
Just to address that (and then I'll move on as well) Euskari (Basque) remains a linguistic mystery to this day.They're practically a different civilisation.
I read somewhere that in San Sebastian although they speak Spanish, they also have a completely different language that has no Latin origins at all.
Anyway, I'm rambling now and veering off topic.
My money would be on Spain for that title.
If the above is designed to address my statement of "let's take care of your lies over "picking out selective years of only 2004 and 2014"., congratulations on failing as miserably as before.
The general reduction in catch, not just by the UK has already been addressed as much as the cod wars that had nothing to do with the EU.
Your constant gish gallops have become so tedious that one can only follow this advice
Say that it's a Gish Gallop and walk away. This method is unlikely to change any minds. ..........which I don't even care to do in your case........... However, because the point of the Gish Gallop is to make opponents waste time and energy playing a game on the Galloper's terms, the best move may be to not play.
seeing how
The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort.
and, to add, a demonstration of the argumentative impotence of those (in this case you) that use it.
The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort.The point is that from the mid 70's the EU were able to plunder British waters, decimating stock. As I said , you're the only person in the world that thinks EU membership has been good for the British fishing industry.
I've enjoyed eating in Britain but that one gets you :lamo:lamo
The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort.
and, to add, a demonstration of the argumentative impotence of those (in this case you) that use it.
The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort.There's nothing individually weak about a government graph showing the UK catch has halved since we joined the EU...probably because other EU countries have plundered our waters.
Your point that there's been a slight up and down tick in recent years is irrelevant other than to try and mis-direct attention away from what's really happening...and your figures don't correlate to the governments own figures either...that's what I said about being selective with sources that fit your agenda.
Why?
Did somebody lash you with a wet spaghetti?:2razz:
Well recently I've been to Berlin, Rome, Tenerife , Prague and Brussels and I'd say the choice in London is better...and I bet if you went to a small City like Portsmouth anywhere in Europe you'd struggle to match the diversity here...although I would say the quality may not be the highest here.
On the same principle of, when on holiday, never going anywhere but "local" (e.g. not going Chinese in Norway), I shunned it and chose the Eastney Tavern for local color (and sea-food of course).Had a few nice meals at the Algarve's Grill to be fair.
Fair enough but you're missing a lot.Just never taken my fancy. Nothing more sinister than that really. I love Italians, we have an amazing authentic street food pizza place here and we're regulars - they keep inviting us over for summer holiday but I'll let my family go and I'll go elsewhere.
Fair enough but you're missing a lot.
The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort.
and, to add, a demonstration of the argumentative impotence of those (in this case you) that use it.
Had a few nice meals at the Algarve's Grill to be fair.
On the same principle of, when on holiday, never going anywhere but "local" (e.g. not going Chinese in Norway), I shunned it and chose the Eastney Tavern for local color (and sea-food of course).
Great!!!
Of course if I lived permanently in the area, I'd now and then go Portuguese like I'll occasionally go Sushi down here in Spain.
~ You just can't accept that the British catch is half of what it was before we joined the EU...that's a ****ing FACT...and its demise happened the minute we joined the EU...that's a ****ing FACT too...**** me...
seeing how I never claimed either harm or advantage-----------So , to make this straight...you think the EU has done no harm to British fishing ? Hahahahahahahahahah, unbelievable , you should pop over here and tell some fishermen that.
seeing how I made no such claim...............You just can't accept that the British catch is half of what it was before we joined the EU.
seeing how profanity cannot serve in substitution of pertinent argument.....................well, you know the rest.that's a ****ing FACT...and its demise happened the minute we joined the EU...that's a ****ing FACT too...**** me...
You see any point in any of this?Just for clarity.. Where are you getting your figures from and what fish are you talking about?
Before we joined the EEC and around the time of the Cod Wars - (1976) The UK fished Cod in Iceland's waters, not UK waters. UK fishermen also fished UK waters but the majority of Cod and haddock came in from Iceland.
Are you including UK catches in Iceland's waters?
Also, since 1995 Cod specifically has suffered and not been able to reproduce in high enough numbers for every year - page 11 of the parliament study I linked before.